Five minutes with…Martin Wintermeier, Twainscore

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Five minutes with…Martin Wintermeier, Twainscore

Twainscore.jpg

Martin Wintermeier discusses taking a hit for clients, not letting stress get to you, and why being a criminal defence lawyer might have been fun

Welcome to the latest instalment of Managing IP’s ‘Five minutes with’ series, where we learn more about IP practitioners on a personal as well as a professional level. This time, we have Martin Wintermeier, partner at Twainscore in Germany.

Someone asks you at a party what you do for a living. What do you say?

I am a lawyer.

Talk us through a typical working day.

When I don’t have to travel for a court hearing at one of the non-Munich venues, the day usually starts with having breakfast with my two daughters while my wife is already owning the day.

I very much enjoy the morning drives to work, during which I have the first calls, either with clients or with colleagues, to talk through the day’s tasks. When I come to the office, I am normally briefed by my assistant about open issues or urgent matters on my desk, which I handle first. During the office day, my work is a mixture of (online) meetings, drafting and reviewing drafts of court briefs, as well as discussing cases and legal issues with the team. I very much enjoy our team lunch, which takes place 3-4 days a week, even in times of exceptionally high workload, and which is a pleasant break during the day.

I usually leave the office at around 9pm. After returning home, I regularly handle some organisational firm matters before enjoying some quality time with my wife.

What are you working on at the moment?

Several patent infringement, entitlement, and validity cases. However, I always try to keep a mixture with less cumbersome matters like e.g an unfair competition or trademark preliminary injunction. Besides, the days are always good for putting out fires that may suddenly arise for our clients or handling the onboarding process for incoming new cases.

Does one big piece of work usually take priority or are you juggling multiple things?

We are service providers. Each case that is accepted by our firm has priority. However, due to the high number of pending court cases, it never gets boring, and we are all skilled jugglers.

What is the most exciting aspect of your role and what is the most stressful?

Working and being challenged in a deadline-driven, professional but contentious environment, including direct confrontation with the opponents and their lawyers in court, is stressful in a positive way and therefore very exciting.

In IP we are lucky to see a high degree of specialisation with the judges and our opposing colleagues, which makes arguing even more fun. That is why I love being active in court. Negative stress is always around us, but I don’t see any benefit in overthinking my personal stress level.

Tell us the key characteristics that make a successful IP lawyer/practitioner.

It is hardly possible to measure success because it is highly subjective.

In my opinion, a successful IP lawyer should be doing this with fun, curiosity, and creativity. An outstanding legal foundation is a given prerequisite for us.

An ability to quickly identify the relevant issues of a matter helps a lot, both to further process the case from a legal perspective as well as from a factual perspective.

In direction to the client, a successful lawyer should be ready to take responsibility for advice given so that the client can follow the lawyer’s advice with a good feeling. A lawyer should be an enabler and not a disabler. However, if something does not work out in the first place, this is also important advice for the client, even though this may irritate the client or cause a loss of profit for the lawyer.

In direction to the opponent, a successful lawyer, in my opinion, never underestimates the opposing colleague.

What is the most common misconception about IP?

The mere IP ownership, because owning IP often doesn’t make a difference, enforcing IP always does.

What or who inspires you?

What: Nature in all its facets.

Who: Irrespective of it being a personal or professional situation, it is people who do not back down when the going gets tough.

If you weren’t in IP, what would you be doing?

I just very recently had a chat about that with one very good white collar crime lawyer colleague with whom we are regularly working on trade secret infringement cases. He confirmed my feeling that being a criminal defence lawyer in complex cases could also be a fun job, maybe with a specialisation in tax law.

If it wasn’t law, I would be an animal researcher.

Any advice you would give your younger self?

Nothing is ever as bad as it seems.

What is your motto in life?

It is always worth fighting.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Jason Raeburn’s arrival will expand the firm’s London footprint in AI, copyright and tech disputes
The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, Eltemate
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
The chief technology officer remit, which has been created as the firm is building its litigation team, will include expanding the use of AI in patent and legal work and automating manual processes
Former Hoyng Rokh Moneiger partner Laura Alonso, who brought her team to ECIJA in March, discusses plans to expand further and why ECIJA’s ‘IP DNA’ is helping broaden her work
Amita Haylock discusses building an integrated Asia practice as clients increasingly demand that firms combine IP, technology and data expertise
Gift this article