Intellectual property gaps in EU–Thailand FTA negotiations

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Intellectual property gaps in EU–Thailand FTA negotiations

Sponsored by

tillekegibbins.png
Handshake.jpg

Victoria MacLeod of Tilleke & Gibbins says compromises are the likely outcome as Thailand considers EU proposals concerning issues such as copyright duration and patent protection terms

Following the conclusion of the fourth round of EU–Thailand free trade agreement (FTA) negotiations in Bangkok in November 2024, the newly released summary report highlights potential intellectual property (IP) changes that may emerge from these discussions.

Below is a summary of some of the key IP protection terms under negotiation.

Copyright duration

Thai copyright law protects works for the author’s lifetime plus 50 years, while the EU proposes extending this by 20 years. This discrepancy remains unresolved, as adopting Thai standards would reduce protection for EU authors, while Thailand accepting the EU proposal would necessitate domestic legislative amendments.

Collective management organisations

The FTA proposes enhanced cooperation between collective management organisations (CMOs) from both parties, emphasising transparency in operations, revenue reporting, and representation agreements.

While Thailand maintains CMOs and the Department of Intellectual Property (DIP) offers a voluntary CMO code, questions remain as to whether current practices will satisfy EU rights holder requirements. Regulators face challenges in balancing oversight with rights holder commercialisation freedom.

Trademark systems

Despite a substantial overlap between Thai trademark law and EU proposals, implementation disparities exist.

The EU proposes publicly accessible electronic databases for trademark applications and registrations. While the EUIPO and Thailand’s DIP maintain such databases, the DIP system is updated less frequently, sometimes requiring in-person verification – a process that can be cumbersome for rights holders.

Patent protection terms

The EU proposes extending design patent protection from Thailand’s current 10-year term to a minimum of 25 years from the application date. Additionally, for patented products subject to marketing authorisation procedures, the EU suggests term extensions reflecting the period between application and authorisation, up to a maximum of five years.

Trade secret alignment

Trade secret protection appears to be an area of minimal conflict, as Thailand’s practices align well with EU proposals.

Outlook for the EU–Thailand FTA

The negotiations will likely result in compromise rather than wholesale adoption of the EU’s proposals. Potential changes include extended protection terms and improved guidelines for CMOs and trademark searches, though rights holders may not receive identical terms to those in the EU.

The summary report confirms that significant gaps remain, with both parties exploring reconciliation between their respective IP systems. With text-based negotiations ongoing, the timeline remains uncertain, though Thailand’s prime minister has directed the Ministry of Commerce to accelerate negotiations, targeting finalisation by the end of 2025. As Thailand pursues multiple FTAs simultaneously, the upcoming Brussels round, which is expected to begin in late March, may prove decisive.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers at Finnegan unpick the UK government’s SEP consultation, and offer tips for patent litigators
In major recent developments, a request for automatic service to counsel in provisional proceedings was rejected and a PI covering Spain was granted
Julia Ericsson of Sandart in Sweden discusses litigating patents at the UPC, overcoming prejudice and how to encourage associates to develop their careers in IP
Reed Smith lawyers say that with the UK’s AI law in a state of flux, IP owners should look beyond the country's borders
We preview Managing IP’s ‘IP Ones to Watch’ list, meet our newest recruit, and look back over the final law firm rankings release of the year
Michael Conway and Flora Hachemi of Haseltine Lake Kempner consider what brand owners and prospective trademark applicants need to know in the wake of the UKIPO’s SkyKick guidance
Our exclusive survey reveals German firms are failing to manage costs and develop young talent, but some counsel believe this is happening behind the scenes
Ulla Loreth, IP counsel at Puma in Germany, says logistics intermediaries can no longer turn a blind eye after ‘game-changing’ judgment in the fight against counterfeits
Ahmed Hankawi joins us for our ‘Five minutes with’ series to discuss his approach to cases, and why he admires lawyers who help develop the next generation
Mercedes Bullrich looks back on her career and explains how a life shaped by fresh starts will help her develop a new firm
Gift this article