Intellectual property gaps in EU–Thailand FTA negotiations

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Intellectual property gaps in EU–Thailand FTA negotiations

Sponsored by

tillekegibbins.png
Handshake.jpg

Victoria MacLeod of Tilleke & Gibbins says compromises are the likely outcome as Thailand considers EU proposals concerning issues such as copyright duration and patent protection terms

Following the conclusion of the fourth round of EU–Thailand free trade agreement (FTA) negotiations in Bangkok in November 2024, the newly released summary report highlights potential intellectual property (IP) changes that may emerge from these discussions.

Below is a summary of some of the key IP protection terms under negotiation.

Copyright duration

Thai copyright law protects works for the author’s lifetime plus 50 years, while the EU proposes extending this by 20 years. This discrepancy remains unresolved, as adopting Thai standards would reduce protection for EU authors, while Thailand accepting the EU proposal would necessitate domestic legislative amendments.

Collective management organisations

The FTA proposes enhanced cooperation between collective management organisations (CMOs) from both parties, emphasising transparency in operations, revenue reporting, and representation agreements.

While Thailand maintains CMOs and the Department of Intellectual Property (DIP) offers a voluntary CMO code, questions remain as to whether current practices will satisfy EU rights holder requirements. Regulators face challenges in balancing oversight with rights holder commercialisation freedom.

Trademark systems

Despite a substantial overlap between Thai trademark law and EU proposals, implementation disparities exist.

The EU proposes publicly accessible electronic databases for trademark applications and registrations. While the EUIPO and Thailand’s DIP maintain such databases, the DIP system is updated less frequently, sometimes requiring in-person verification – a process that can be cumbersome for rights holders.

Patent protection terms

The EU proposes extending design patent protection from Thailand’s current 10-year term to a minimum of 25 years from the application date. Additionally, for patented products subject to marketing authorisation procedures, the EU suggests term extensions reflecting the period between application and authorisation, up to a maximum of five years.

Trade secret alignment

Trade secret protection appears to be an area of minimal conflict, as Thailand’s practices align well with EU proposals.

Outlook for the EU–Thailand FTA

The negotiations will likely result in compromise rather than wholesale adoption of the EU’s proposals. Potential changes include extended protection terms and improved guidelines for CMOs and trademark searches, though rights holders may not receive identical terms to those in the EU.

The summary report confirms that significant gaps remain, with both parties exploring reconciliation between their respective IP systems. With text-based negotiations ongoing, the timeline remains uncertain, though Thailand’s prime minister has directed the Ministry of Commerce to accelerate negotiations, targeting finalisation by the end of 2025. As Thailand pursues multiple FTAs simultaneously, the upcoming Brussels round, which is expected to begin in late March, may prove decisive.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
In Iconix v Dream Pairs, the Supreme Court said the Court of Appeal was wrong to interfere with an earlier ruling, prompting questions about the appeal court’s remit
Chris Moore at HGF reflects on the ‘spirit of collegiality’ that led to an important ruling in G1/24, a case concerning how European patent claims should be interpreted
Gift this article