Intellectual property gaps in EU–Thailand FTA negotiations

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Intellectual property gaps in EU–Thailand FTA negotiations

Sponsored by

tillekegibbins.png
Handshake.jpg

Victoria MacLeod of Tilleke & Gibbins says compromises are the likely outcome as Thailand considers EU proposals concerning issues such as copyright duration and patent protection terms

Following the conclusion of the fourth round of EU–Thailand free trade agreement (FTA) negotiations in Bangkok in November 2024, the newly released summary report highlights potential intellectual property (IP) changes that may emerge from these discussions.

Below is a summary of some of the key IP protection terms under negotiation.

Copyright duration

Thai copyright law protects works for the author’s lifetime plus 50 years, while the EU proposes extending this by 20 years. This discrepancy remains unresolved, as adopting Thai standards would reduce protection for EU authors, while Thailand accepting the EU proposal would necessitate domestic legislative amendments.

Collective management organisations

The FTA proposes enhanced cooperation between collective management organisations (CMOs) from both parties, emphasising transparency in operations, revenue reporting, and representation agreements.

While Thailand maintains CMOs and the Department of Intellectual Property (DIP) offers a voluntary CMO code, questions remain as to whether current practices will satisfy EU rights holder requirements. Regulators face challenges in balancing oversight with rights holder commercialisation freedom.

Trademark systems

Despite a substantial overlap between Thai trademark law and EU proposals, implementation disparities exist.

The EU proposes publicly accessible electronic databases for trademark applications and registrations. While the EUIPO and Thailand’s DIP maintain such databases, the DIP system is updated less frequently, sometimes requiring in-person verification – a process that can be cumbersome for rights holders.

Patent protection terms

The EU proposes extending design patent protection from Thailand’s current 10-year term to a minimum of 25 years from the application date. Additionally, for patented products subject to marketing authorisation procedures, the EU suggests term extensions reflecting the period between application and authorisation, up to a maximum of five years.

Trade secret alignment

Trade secret protection appears to be an area of minimal conflict, as Thailand’s practices align well with EU proposals.

Outlook for the EU–Thailand FTA

The negotiations will likely result in compromise rather than wholesale adoption of the EU’s proposals. Potential changes include extended protection terms and improved guidelines for CMOs and trademark searches, though rights holders may not receive identical terms to those in the EU.

The summary report confirms that significant gaps remain, with both parties exploring reconciliation between their respective IP systems. With text-based negotiations ongoing, the timeline remains uncertain, though Thailand’s prime minister has directed the Ministry of Commerce to accelerate negotiations, targeting finalisation by the end of 2025. As Thailand pursues multiple FTAs simultaneously, the upcoming Brussels round, which is expected to begin in late March, may prove decisive.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The Getty Images v Stability AI case, which will hear untested points of law, is a reminder of the importance of the legal system and the excitement it can generate
Firms explain the IP concerns that can arise amid attempts by brands to show off their ‘Canadianness’ to consumers
Counsel say they will be monitoring issues such as the placement of house marks, and how Mondelēz demonstrates a likelihood of confusion in its dispute with Aldi
The EUIPO expanding its mediation services and a new Riyadh office for Simmons & Simmons were also among the top talking points this week
David Boundy explains why Pierson Ferdinand provides a platform that will allow him to use administrative law to address IP concerns
Developments included an anti-anti-suit injunction being granted for the first time, and the court clarifying that it can adjudicate over alleged infringements that occurred before June 2023
Griffith Hack’s Amanda Stark, one of our ‘Top 250 Women in IP’, explains how peer support from male colleagues is crucial, and reveals why the life sciences sector is thriving
The case, which could offer clarity on the training of AI models within the context of copyright law, will go to trial in the UK next week
CMS IndusLaw co-founder Suneeth Katarki says he plans to hire a patent team in India and argues that IP should play a major role within full-service firms
Partners at the firm explain why they’ve seen more SEP cases at the ITC, and why they are comfortable recommending the forum to clients
Gift this article