Restructuring of the Vietnamese government: impacts on intellectual property

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Restructuring of the Vietnamese government: impacts on intellectual property

Sponsored by

tillekegibbins.png
National Assembly of Vietnam

Vietnam’s intellectual property landscape will be reshaped by ministry mergers and streamlined courts, say Linh Duy Mai and Giang Hoang Bach of T&G Law Firm LLC (TGVN), the local associate of Tilleke & Gibbins

Vietnam’s government is undergoing a significant restructuring, consolidating and eliminating various agencies with the aim of streamlining operations and increasing efficiency. The restructuring will bring notable changes to the country’s intellectual property (IP) landscape. This article discusses key developments that may influence IP protection and enforcement in Vietnam in the coming years.

Mergers of ministries

One of the most notable changes in the restructuring is the merger of several ministries, including the Ministry of Information and Communications (MIC) and the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST). Vietnam’s Intellectual Property Office is a unit under MOST; therefore, this merger is expected to impact various aspects of IP administration and enforcement.

With the newly merged ministry – which is expected to retain the name of MOST – actively supporting the development of the digital economy, further advancements in digital tools for IP administration and prosecution are anticipated. This could include enhancements in e-filing, online procedures, and digital payment systems, contributing to greater accessibility and efficiency in IP-related services.

Domain name disputes can also expect to see a more coordinated approach under the new ministry. Previously, jurisdiction over domain name disputes was divided between MIC and MOST, sometimes leading to procedural complexities. With both areas now under a single ministry, these matters are expected to be handled more seamlessly, potentially with a model aligned with the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy.

Structural changes in Vietnamese IP inspection authorities

The restructuring also affects inspection authorities responsible for IP enforcement, particularly those under MOST and the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism (MOCST). These changes may cause temporary delays in administrative enforcement actions:

  • The MOST Inspectorate, which handles industrial property violations, may experience slower enforcement during the transition; and

  • The MOCST Inspectorate, responsible for copyright enforcement, may face similar disruptions.

However, these delays are expected to be temporary, with enforcement efficiency likely to improve once the new structures are fully implemented.

Market Surveillance Department now managed by provincial governments

The Market Surveillance Department, which was previously under the Ministry of Industry and Trade, has been transferred to the management of provincial governments. This decentralisation may initially impact the coordination and consistency of IP raids and enforcement actions. However, the central government has instructed provincial authorities to maintain enforcement efficiency, minimising potential delays. Over time, this change could lead to more localised and responsive enforcement, tailored to the specific needs of each province.

Streamlining the court system

The restructuring extends to Vietnam’s judiciary, with significant changes expected at the provincial and district levels:

  • Some provinces are set to merge, reducing the total number from the current 63; and

  • District-level courts may be eliminated, aligning with the recent removal of district-level police forces.

These changes are anticipated to enhance judicial independence by reducing local government influence on court proceedings. However, the restructuring may delay the establishment of a dedicated IP court, initially expected by the end of 2025. Once operational, the streamlined court system is expected to provide faster, more consistent rulings on IP disputes, strengthening judicial enforcement of IP rights.

Minimal impact on customs enforcement

Customs enforcement, a key component of IP protection at Vietnam’s borders, is expected to experience minimal disruption despite the ongoing merger and streamlining of customs authorities. The core functions of intercepting counterfeit goods and enforcing IP rights at border checkpoints will continue as before, ensuring that cross-border IP protection remains robust.

Outlook for IP in Vietnam

Vietnam’s government restructuring is set to reshape the country’s IP landscape, bringing both challenges and opportunities. While temporary delays may occur, the consolidation of IP administration under a new ministry with a stronger focus on technology advancement, improved coordination in domain name disputes, and streamlined enforcement mechanisms is expected to enhance efficiency, consistency, and judicial independence in the long run.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A principal at Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner explains how AI tools, including DeepIP, can position the firm to help clients
The firm explains why AI-empowered data analytics could make it more efficient advocates for its clients
Penelope Aspinall, of IP wellbeing charity Jonathan’s Voice, explains why managers should take a three-tiered approach to looking after workers’ mental health
Heath Hoglund talks about the value proposition of patent pools and why it went ahead with its first-ever series of pool meetings in China
Ryan Richardson, Chris O’Brien, and Jean Selep of Sterne Kessler analyse the treatment of SEPs at the UPC and ITC and highlight why SEP holders and implementers should be mindful of current developments in both forums
A ruling concerning the UPC’s jurisdiction, questions over costs transparency, and a missed deadline by Amazon were among the top talking points this fortnight
Exclusive data and analysis reveal how firms can differentiate themselves when it comes to costs and value
The Berlin office will mark the firm’s fourth German base and tenth overall
As we build up to another busy year for the IP STARS rankings and Managing IP Awards, we give a rundown of some of the major IP firms and trends in the UK
Three firms have received at least 13 nominations, while a further three have 12 nominations each
Gift this article