Restructuring of the Vietnamese government: impacts on intellectual property

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Restructuring of the Vietnamese government: impacts on intellectual property

Sponsored by

tillekegibbins.png
National Assembly of Vietnam

Vietnam’s intellectual property landscape will be reshaped by ministry mergers and streamlined courts, say Linh Duy Mai and Giang Hoang Bach of T&G Law Firm LLC (TGVN), the local associate of Tilleke & Gibbins

Vietnam’s government is undergoing a significant restructuring, consolidating and eliminating various agencies with the aim of streamlining operations and increasing efficiency. The restructuring will bring notable changes to the country’s intellectual property (IP) landscape. This article discusses key developments that may influence IP protection and enforcement in Vietnam in the coming years.

Mergers of ministries

One of the most notable changes in the restructuring is the merger of several ministries, including the Ministry of Information and Communications (MIC) and the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST). Vietnam’s Intellectual Property Office is a unit under MOST; therefore, this merger is expected to impact various aspects of IP administration and enforcement.

With the newly merged ministry – which is expected to retain the name of MOST – actively supporting the development of the digital economy, further advancements in digital tools for IP administration and prosecution are anticipated. This could include enhancements in e-filing, online procedures, and digital payment systems, contributing to greater accessibility and efficiency in IP-related services.

Domain name disputes can also expect to see a more coordinated approach under the new ministry. Previously, jurisdiction over domain name disputes was divided between MIC and MOST, sometimes leading to procedural complexities. With both areas now under a single ministry, these matters are expected to be handled more seamlessly, potentially with a model aligned with the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy.

Structural changes in Vietnamese IP inspection authorities

The restructuring also affects inspection authorities responsible for IP enforcement, particularly those under MOST and the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism (MOCST). These changes may cause temporary delays in administrative enforcement actions:

  • The MOST Inspectorate, which handles industrial property violations, may experience slower enforcement during the transition; and

  • The MOCST Inspectorate, responsible for copyright enforcement, may face similar disruptions.

However, these delays are expected to be temporary, with enforcement efficiency likely to improve once the new structures are fully implemented.

Market Surveillance Department now managed by provincial governments

The Market Surveillance Department, which was previously under the Ministry of Industry and Trade, has been transferred to the management of provincial governments. This decentralisation may initially impact the coordination and consistency of IP raids and enforcement actions. However, the central government has instructed provincial authorities to maintain enforcement efficiency, minimising potential delays. Over time, this change could lead to more localised and responsive enforcement, tailored to the specific needs of each province.

Streamlining the court system

The restructuring extends to Vietnam’s judiciary, with significant changes expected at the provincial and district levels:

  • Some provinces are set to merge, reducing the total number from the current 63; and

  • District-level courts may be eliminated, aligning with the recent removal of district-level police forces.

These changes are anticipated to enhance judicial independence by reducing local government influence on court proceedings. However, the restructuring may delay the establishment of a dedicated IP court, initially expected by the end of 2025. Once operational, the streamlined court system is expected to provide faster, more consistent rulings on IP disputes, strengthening judicial enforcement of IP rights.

Minimal impact on customs enforcement

Customs enforcement, a key component of IP protection at Vietnam’s borders, is expected to experience minimal disruption despite the ongoing merger and streamlining of customs authorities. The core functions of intercepting counterfeit goods and enforcing IP rights at border checkpoints will continue as before, ensuring that cross-border IP protection remains robust.

Outlook for IP in Vietnam

Vietnam’s government restructuring is set to reshape the country’s IP landscape, bringing both challenges and opportunities. While temporary delays may occur, the consolidation of IP administration under a new ministry with a stronger focus on technology advancement, improved coordination in domain name disputes, and streamlined enforcement mechanisms is expected to enhance efficiency, consistency, and judicial independence in the long run.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
In Iconix v Dream Pairs, the Supreme Court said the Court of Appeal was wrong to interfere with an earlier ruling, prompting questions about the appeal court’s remit
Chris Moore at HGF reflects on the ‘spirit of collegiality’ that led to an important ruling in G1/24, a case concerning how European patent claims should be interpreted
Gift this article