TurkAegean: Is it abusive to argue trademark invalidity on absolute grounds?

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

TurkAegean: Is it abusive to argue trademark invalidity on absolute grounds?

Sponsored by

patrinos-logo.png
Greek flag over the sea

Manolis Metaxakis of Patrinos & Kilimiris Law Offices considers the implications of the EUIPO ruling in favour of the Hellenic Republic concerning the validity of the ‘TurkAegean’ trademark

The Turkish Tourism Promotion and Development Agency has applied before the EUIPO for the trademark ‘TurkAegean’ to designate tourism-related services. This trademark was initially accepted for registration by the EUIPO. However, the registrability of the mark was the subject of intense debate due to various absolute grounds under the EU Trademark Regulation (EUTMR) regime.

This was confirmed by decision C 58 927 of the EUIPO’s Cancellation Division of January 10 2025; under which, the application for a declaration of invalidity filed by the Hellenic Republic was upheld. It was particularly held that the trademark ‘TurkAegean’ was non-distinctive and descriptive, and, thus, invalid.

The EUIPO’s Cancellation Division was also called upon to rule on a preliminary issue; namely, whether filing an application for a declaration of invalidity could be regarded as an abuse of right. In this respect, it was held that unlike relative grounds, which protect a third party’s interests, absolute grounds are aimed at protecting general interests. It follows that the potential or actual economic interest pursued by the applicant for a declaration of invalidity is not of relevance and, consequently, there can be no question of an ‘abuse of rights’ while filing a declaration of invalidity of that type.

One must take into account that this kind of objection should, as a matter of law, be examined first; that is to say, before the deciding body gets into the substance of the case. The risk is obvious: a trademark that is actually invalid on absolute grounds may nevertheless survive because its registrability is linked with a third party’s potential or actual economic interests.

The above-mentioned ruling is well established. In fact, any approach to the contrary is not favoured by established EU case law. The purpose of the administrative procedure laid down in the EUTMR is, inter alia, to enable the EUIPO to review the validity of the registration of a trademark and to adopt, where necessary, a position that it should have adopted of its own motion (C-622/13, Section 42; C-450/13, Section 40).

In essence, this is about the fundamental principle of legality. All decisions concerning the registration of a sign as an EU trademark, which the EUIPO is called on to take under the EUTMR, are adopted in the exercise of circumscribed power and are not a matter of discretion (C-37/03, Section 47).

In plain words, there can be no immunity for a trademark that is actually invalid on absolute grounds. Legal certainty prevails.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A ruling on confidentiality by the the England and Wales Court of Appeal and an intervention from the US government in the InterDigital v Disney litigation were also among top talking points
Moore & Van Allen hires former Teva counsel Larry Rickles to help expand the firm’s life sciences capabilities
Canadian law firms should avoid ‘tunnel vision’ as exclusive survey reveals client dissatisfaction with risk management advice and value-added services
In major recent developments, the CoA ruled on director liability for patent infringement, and Nokia targeted Paramount at the UPC and in Germany
Niri Shan, the newly appointed head of IP for UK, Ireland and the Middle East, explains why the firm’s international setup has brought UPC success, and addresses German partner departures
Vlad Stanese joins our ‘Five minutes with’ series to discuss potentially precedent-setting trademark and copyright cases and his love for aviation
Heath Hoglund, president of Via LA, discusses how it sets royalty rates and its plans to build on growth in China
Stobbs stands accused of interfering with the administration of justice after Brandsmiths’ client was subjected to an interim injunction for unjustified threats
The firm, known for its prosecution expertise, discusses its plans following the appointment of a UK-based patent litigation head and two new partners
Ed White at Clarivate provides an exclusive insight into the innovation power clusters reshaping Europe and the Middle East’s IP landscape, and why quality is the new currency of invention
Gift this article