Guide to the new patent and utility model system for OAPI members

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Guide to the new patent and utility model system for OAPI members

Sponsored by

spoor-fisher-400px.png
Changing from 2024 to 2025

New patent and utility model procedures and updated fees form part of a legislative update to the Bangui Agreement that became effective in the new year, explains Craig Kahn of Spoor & Fisher Jersey

Authorities in the African Intellectual Property Organisation (OAPI) have announced changes to the Bangui Agreement’s provisions relating to patents and utility models (annexes I and II, respectively). The new measures came into effect on January 1 2025.

OAPI is the regional intellectual property system that applies in much of French-speaking Africa. There are 17 member states of OAPI; namely, Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, the Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros (except Mayotte), Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Ivory Coast, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Senegal, and Togo. An OAPI patent or utility model application automatically covers all member states and it is not possible to designate the countries of interest.

The Bangui Agreement changes in brief

The changes to the Bangui Agreement relate only to annexes I and II, and the most significant points to note are as follows:

  • The changes only apply to patent and utility model applications filed on or after January 1 2025. Currently pending applications filed before January 1 2025 will be prosecuted according to the previous provisions of the Bangui Agreement that applied to patents and utility models.

  • Patent and utility model applications will be subject to substantive examination. OAPI patent examiners have been undergoing training in Cameroon and Ivory Coast. For OAPI Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) regional phase applications, it is expected that the examiners will rely on the PCT international search report and the international preliminary examination report when conducting a substantive examination. An examination must be requested within three months from a request from OAPI, and examination fees must be paid with any excess claims fees.

  • It is possible to file voluntary divisional applications at any time before grant, and in response to a substantive examination office action.

  • Patent and utility model opposition is now provided for and applications will be published for opposition purposes. Any interested party may oppose the issuance of a patent or a utility model application, within three months of the publication of the application.

  • Pharmaceutical product inventions – the World Trade Organization Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights has extended the exclusion of pharmaceutical products from patent protection until January 1 2033 for ‘least developed countries’ (LDCs). OAPI member states that qualify as LDCs are no longer required to apply the provisions of Annex I regarding patents relating to a pharmaceutical product.

  • Non-PCT applications will be published within 18 months of the filing date or the priority date. All patents will be published upon grant.

  • New official fees for patents and utility models have been issued.

  • Any annuities that are due in 2025 but that were paid in 2024 will be subject to the 2025 annuity official fees. It is understood that OAPI will send out notifications informing the applicant/patentee of the shortfall.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The Getty Images v Stability AI case, which will hear untested points of law, is a reminder of the importance of the legal system and the excitement it can generate
Firms explain the IP concerns that can arise amid attempts by brands to show off their ‘Canadianness’ to consumers
Counsel say they will be monitoring issues such as the placement of house marks, and how Mondelēz demonstrates a likelihood of confusion in its dispute with Aldi
The EUIPO expanding its mediation services and a new Riyadh office for Simmons & Simmons were also among the top talking points this week
David Boundy explains why Pierson Ferdinand provides a platform that will allow him to use administrative law to address IP concerns
Developments included an anti-anti-suit injunction being granted for the first time, and the court clarifying that it can adjudicate over alleged infringements that occurred before June 2023
Griffith Hack’s Amanda Stark, one of our ‘Top 250 Women in IP’, explains how peer support from male colleagues is crucial, and reveals why the life sciences sector is thriving
The case, which could offer clarity on the training of AI models within the context of copyright law, will go to trial in the UK next week
CMS IndusLaw co-founder Suneeth Katarki says he plans to hire a patent team in India and argues that IP should play a major role within full-service firms
Partners at the firm explain why they’ve seen more SEP cases at the ITC, and why they are comfortable recommending the forum to clients
Gift this article