Guide to the new patent and utility model system for OAPI members

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Guide to the new patent and utility model system for OAPI members

Sponsored by

spoor-fisher-400px.png
Changing from 2024 to 2025

New patent and utility model procedures and updated fees form part of a legislative update to the Bangui Agreement that became effective in the new year, explains Craig Kahn of Spoor & Fisher Jersey

Authorities in the African Intellectual Property Organisation (OAPI) have announced changes to the Bangui Agreement’s provisions relating to patents and utility models (annexes I and II, respectively). The new measures came into effect on January 1 2025.

OAPI is the regional intellectual property system that applies in much of French-speaking Africa. There are 17 member states of OAPI; namely, Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, the Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros (except Mayotte), Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Ivory Coast, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Senegal, and Togo. An OAPI patent or utility model application automatically covers all member states and it is not possible to designate the countries of interest.

The Bangui Agreement changes in brief

The changes to the Bangui Agreement relate only to annexes I and II, and the most significant points to note are as follows:

  • The changes only apply to patent and utility model applications filed on or after January 1 2025. Currently pending applications filed before January 1 2025 will be prosecuted according to the previous provisions of the Bangui Agreement that applied to patents and utility models.

  • Patent and utility model applications will be subject to substantive examination. OAPI patent examiners have been undergoing training in Cameroon and Ivory Coast. For OAPI Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) regional phase applications, it is expected that the examiners will rely on the PCT international search report and the international preliminary examination report when conducting a substantive examination. An examination must be requested within three months from a request from OAPI, and examination fees must be paid with any excess claims fees.

  • It is possible to file voluntary divisional applications at any time before grant, and in response to a substantive examination office action.

  • Patent and utility model opposition is now provided for and applications will be published for opposition purposes. Any interested party may oppose the issuance of a patent or a utility model application, within three months of the publication of the application.

  • Pharmaceutical product inventions – the World Trade Organization Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights has extended the exclusion of pharmaceutical products from patent protection until January 1 2033 for ‘least developed countries’ (LDCs). OAPI member states that qualify as LDCs are no longer required to apply the provisions of Annex I regarding patents relating to a pharmaceutical product.

  • Non-PCT applications will be published within 18 months of the filing date or the priority date. All patents will be published upon grant.

  • New official fees for patents and utility models have been issued.

  • Any annuities that are due in 2025 but that were paid in 2024 will be subject to the 2025 annuity official fees. It is understood that OAPI will send out notifications informing the applicant/patentee of the shortfall.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

IP boutique Petillion represented IKEA in the dispute, which concerned the use of the multinational’s trademarks in an immigration-focused campaign. The firm tells Managing IP how it secured the outcome
The Pizzeys-Griffith Hack integration was designed to create a stronger Australian IP platform but with several ex-Pizzeys principals now gone, the deal's success may depend on where clients place their trust
Thomas Lonsdale and Hsu Min Chung of HGF explore the practical impact of the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal’s decision in G1/25 and its interplay with G1/24
The firm’s recent IP hire and launch of a new robotics industry group signal an effort to capture work emerging from AI entering the physical world
Another firm sets up shop in Dallas, bringing its patent disputes capabilities to one of the US’s busiest litigation venues
Entrepreneurial IP lawyers are still launching specialist firms, but increasingly with larger teams, broader coverage and greater infrastructure than the boutique model once implied
Jevon Louis explains how Covid led to a focus on local clients, discusses why mediation is successful in Singapore and reflects on the growing demand for AI advice
An increase in instructions from domestic companies and litigation for international clients are driving success for the Chinese IP firm, according to two lead partners
Ankur Sangal said he wants his team, nearly 30-strong already, to respond to a growing demand for specialist, commercially focused IP advice in a ‘rapidly evolving’ Indian market
As AI adoption accelerates across corporate IP departments, Simon Webster, president of IP at Clarivate, argues that success will depend less on technology alone and more on data quality, workflow design, and organisational readiness
Gift this article