Ethiopia accedes to the Paris Convention and the Madrid Protocol

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Ethiopia accedes to the Paris Convention and the Madrid Protocol

Sponsored by

spoor-fisher-400px.png
Ethiopian flag

Matthew Costard of Spoor & Fisher Jersey considers application of the Madrid Protocol across Africa as Ethiopia’s intellectual property practice looks set to move closer to global standards

On October 1 2024, Ethiopia’s Council of Ministers approved the country’s accession to the following international agreements:

Ratification

Both agreements require ratification by the Ethiopian Federal Parliamentary Assembly. This will involve legislative reforms, and it is understood that the Ethiopian Intellectual Property Authority is working on revisions to the current intellectual property (IP) laws, in consultation with local practitioners.

A focus on the Madrid Protocol

With Ethiopia acceding to the Madrid Protocol, it is appropriate to look at this in some detail.

The basics

The Madrid Protocol makes international trademark registration simpler and cheaper. The procedure is as follows:

  • The trademark owner files a domestic (home) application;

  • The trademark owner subsequently files an application for an international registration (IR) – this application is filed with WIPO;

  • In the application with WIPO, the trademark owner designates the Madrid Protocol member countries that it wishes to cover;

  • WIPO examines the international application for formalities; and

  • An examination on merits (such as distinctiveness) is left to the registries of the designated countries.

African countries that have joined

A considerable number of African countries and regional organisations are members of the Madrid Protocol; namely, Algeria, Botswana, Cape Verde, Egypt, Eswatini, Gambia, Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, OAPI (the regional system covering most of French-speaking Africa), Rwanda, São Tomé and Príncipe, Sierra Leone, Sudan, Tunisia, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.

African countries that have held back

Some of Africa’s largest economies have, to date, failed to sign up to the Madrid Protocol. These are Angola, Nigeria, South Africa, Tanzania, and Uganda.

International registrations are not effective everywhere

It is important to note that in Africa there are Madrid Protocol signatories where IRs are seemingly neither effective nor valid, and where they should probably be avoided; namely, Eswatini, Lesotho, Sierra Leone, and Zambia.

International registrations can be challenged in certain countries

There are Madrid Protocol signatory countries where the validity of an IR designation could be challenged; namely, Botswana, Gambia, Ghana, Kenya, Liberia, Malawi, Namibia, São Tomé and Príncipe, Tunisia, and Zimbabwe, as well as the OAPI regional system.

Positive developments

The recent developments in Ethiopia should be seen in a positive light. Ethiopia’s accession to two major IP treaties, together with the modernisation of its IP laws, should bring the country more into line with global standards.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
In Iconix v Dream Pairs, the Supreme Court said the Court of Appeal was wrong to interfere with an earlier ruling, prompting questions about the appeal court’s remit
Chris Moore at HGF reflects on the ‘spirit of collegiality’ that led to an important ruling in G1/24, a case concerning how European patent claims should be interpreted
Gift this article