Patent searching: going beyond the basics to increase efficiency

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Patent searching: going beyond the basics to increase efficiency

Sponsored by

Logo 22.07.22.png
Cogs.jpg

With an ever-increasing amount of information available, efficient patent searching is vital for businesses and researchers. This article, originally published by CAS, outlines five essential strategies and several advanced tools to enhance search efficacy

In today's information age, conducting a comprehensive patent search is crucial for researchers, legal teams, and businesses. Failing to locate relevant documents in a timely and cost-effective manner can have dire consequences. However, performing a thorough search can be daunting and time consuming, especially when resources are limited. The good news is that advanced tools and technology designed for intellectual property (IP) searching can help to alleviate this strain and improve efficiency. This article will offer tips on leveraging tools and strategies to accelerate your path towards comprehensive searches and better patent insights:

  • Tip 1 – use expert-curated and comprehensive databases;

  • Tip 2 – use AI tools and precision search technology to augment your search strategy;

  • Tip 3 – optimise patent family searching;

  • Tip 4 – establish alerts for new patent applications or changes to existing patents; and

  • Tip 5 – collaborate with partners who have expertise in IP and your field.

Tip 1: Use expert-curated and comprehensive databases

It is common for IP researchers to execute a search in multiple databases to ensure the comprehensiveness of their search and ensure relevant hits are captured. Variations in subject matter, document coverage, and indexing practices influence the results returned.

A robust search strategy executed across multiple databases can boost comprehensiveness, help you to understand your result set, and enable you to refine your query to get the information you need without missing critical documents.

How CAS can help

CAS connects searchers to a comprehensive collection of content from the world’s top publishers and databases within a single platform: CAS STNext.

CAS STNext combines authoritative scientist-curated chemistry content from CAS, a comprehensive collection of patent information and full texts, and more than 130 premier global databases covering chemistry, biomedical, pharmaceutical, IP, and engineering disciplines.

Searchers can leverage value-added databases, full-text databases, and clusters focused on particular subjects or features to create a comprehensive search strategy that fits their unique requirements.

CAS STNext users can also access CAS-curated databases, making precise searches possible. For instance, if you are looking for chemical IP, you may focus your search on specific molecules. But are you taking into account the substances hidden in Markush structure claims? A form of generic shorthand used to describe many structurally similar materials succinctly, Markush structures should be taken into account and understood when searching for IP.

Performing a generic chemical structure search can yield thousands of distinct substances, but only some precisely match the one you are searching for. When conducting a broad and generic search against a database of specific chemical substances, only those matching the same chemicals are returned; this fails to identify essential claims covering Markush structures. Using tools within CAS STNext, you can search more than 1.3 million Markush structures, ensuring no stone is left unturned.

Tip 2: Use AI tools and precision search technology to augment aspects of the patent search

The EPO found that comprehensive patent searches use 1.3 billion technical records in 179 databases, with approximately 600 million documents showing up in monthly patent searches. There is a need for solutions that enable thorough, up-to-date patent searches. Advanced search platforms are available but limited by database features. The only way to make a search comprehensive is to spend a lot of time searching.

AI algorithms can improve efficiency by augmenting aspects of a search strategy, such as pulling in relevant results that may have been missed.

How CAS can help

CAS offers exclusive AI-enhanced prior art search technology in CAS STNext. The proprietary patent similarity engine assembles a list of relevant patent and non-patent literature references published before any specified starting patent document to serve up patent insights you may not have captured in your original search.

Here is an example of CAS’s AI-supported capability in action. In partnership with the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) of Brazil, CAS developed a set of 10 AI-based algorithms, which together formed a consolidated list of highly accurate and ordered prior art search results. By integrating AI-based algorithms into their search workflows, INPI was able to improve the efficiency of its patent searches:

  • 77% of local applications processed required less time for searches; and

  • 29% of these processes did not require searching outside the AI-augmented search results.

CAS graphic.svg

Tip 3: Optimise patent family searching

Related patents in a patent family may be filed in different jurisdictions and geographics but are linked together by the priority application (i.e., basic patent) – the earliest patent application that establishes the priority date for the family and serves as the foundation for the claims and specification in the related patents.

By understanding the scope and coverage of related patents within a family, patent owners, patent pursuers, and potential licensees can make informed decisions about whether to seek a licence, challenge the validity of patents, and allocate resources to lengthy R&D initiatives. However, complete patent family searching is time consuming and challenging. This is due to the complexities of multi-jurisdiction filing, inconsistencies in indexing across databases, language barriers, and the scientific sophistication of the innovation.

Increasing the difficulty of this already complex task is claims variation. The initial set of claims presented in a patent application will typically be the same across all related patents within a patent family. However, during the prosecution process, which involves interactions between the applicant and the patent office, the claims may be amended or narrowed in response to objections from the examiner or in an effort to overcome prior art. As a result, the claims in related patents within the same patent family may differ from one another after prosecution.

To overcome these challenges, patent searchers often use a combination of search techniques, including keyword, classification, and citation searching. They also need to be familiar with the different databases and search tools available for patent searching, as well as the patent laws and regulations in various jurisdictions. Additionally, patent searchers may collaborate with patent attorneys and technical experts to ensure that they identify all the relevant patents in a family.

How CAS can help

CAS STNext provides a source of reliable data from the world's leading patent family databases, and offers a number of features to ensure your search is comprehensive, such as:

  • Multi-file searching capabilities;

  • Simple commands to search for additional family records, including equivalents and related patents; and

  • An easy-to-navigate overview of the relationship between the claims within a patent application.

Tip 4: Establish alerts for new patent applications or changes to existing patents

According to the USPTO, 646,244 patent applications were filed in the US in 2020. There is a need to stay updated with newly published patent documents so that patent searchers do not find themselves missing innovative advances that may point to a growing market for investment or the need to deal with a new competitor.

Advanced search tools with the functionality to provide alerts when new entries are added that match your search criteria will help you to stay on top of the patent landscape and reduce the iterative searching process.

How CAS can help

Solutions within the STN IP Protection Suite offer custom alerting capability to ensure you are notified when relevant results match your saved query.

In addition, FIZ PatMon, part of the STN IP Protection Suite, makes patent monitoring more efficient by offering features that help you to get alerts for activities such as:

  • Patent applications throughout the entire patent prosecution process;

  • Changes in patent validity;

  • The emergence of competitor patents locally or in other countries;

  • Oppositions and withdrawals of relevant patents; and

  • Patent grants in specific countries.

These features make it easier for individuals across an organisation to get customised alerts that meet their search criteria, reducing the need for time-consuming manual patent checks.

Tip 5: Collaborate with partners that have expertise in IP and your field

Keeping up with IP search demands can be overwhelming as search demands evolve. Delays in this area can result in overlooking competitors’ activities that may inform future investment decisions or missing critical documents that can impact your ability to do business.

Partnering with search experts in your industry can efficiently support your IP search needs by connecting you to the content you need, the tools to search it most efficiently, and training and dedicated expertise to help to fill any gaps and ensure your success.

How CAS can help

The CAS team has deep technical knowledge within IP and various scientific sectors.

The team is primed to uncover information that others simply cannot.

Collaborating with CAS for your search needs could help to ensure that your patent searches are comprehensive and detailed.

Summary

Conducting IP searches and staying updated with the latest developments is vital for any organisation, as it can inform decision making on investments or emerging competitors. Here is how you can increase efficiency with your patent searches:

  • Use expert-curated and comprehensive databases to simplify the traversing of complex data, thus eradicating any content source lapses.

  • Consider solutions that pair AI-driven search support with other precision solutions. Not only can AI recognise related innovations, but it can also help you to identify additional terminology or particulars that may help you to build a more robust search strategy.

  • Streamline patent family searching by detecting similar patents across all jurisdictions and ensuring you understand global coverage.

  • Keep up to date on the latest patent applications with advanced search tools that offer notifications when new entries align with your enquiry; thus, no more tedious and repetitive searching.

  • Partner with experts in IP and your industry to streamline and augment your patent search process.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers at A&O Shearman discuss six clauses typically found in brand licenses and identify the main points to consider
Deborah Kirk will head up Skadden’s IP and technology transactions team
The firm, which recently added high-profile IP lawyer Joel Smith to its cross-disciplinary practice, wants to respond to clients’ shifting demands
Counsel in Germany, Brazil, and Colombia explain what a US ruling on anti-suit injunctions in a FRAND case means for their advice to clients
Data outlining practitioners’ hopes for the UPC plus news of two major patent licence agreements were among the biggest IP developments this week
Kit Crumbley reveals his plans at Bracewell now that he can officially represent clients at the PTAB
Counsel at five law firms explain some of the trends affecting their businesses, such as difficulties holding onto young talent
A judge left baffled by a Federal Circuit ruling concerning claim construction recused himself from reviewing the patent dispute
Mr Justice James Mellor said the problem of forum shopping in FRAND cases is likely to multiply given the launch of the UPC
Law firms should act now to highlight their credentials for the next research and awards cycle
Gift this article