Are TikTok works protected by Mexico’s Federal Copyright Law?

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Are TikTok works protected by Mexico’s Federal Copyright Law?

Sponsored by

olivares-400px.jpg
smartphone-5503211.png

With TikTok videos frequently using music created by popular artists and adding a personal touch to trends, Jaime Ortega of OLIVARES answers a central question regarding whether the videos constitute original creations or reproductions

Article 94 of Mexico’s Federal Copyright Law (FCL) defines audiovisual works as those expressed by means of associated images, with or without incorporated sound, which are perceptible, by means of technical devices, producing a movement sensation.

TikTok is a social network that allows the user to create a video (a TikTok; i.e., an audiovisual work), which is generally short, and then upload it to the user's profile on the app, to interact with other users of the social network.

'Influencers' (and users without many followers) upload TikToks of themselves dancing, singing, acting, reviewing books or movies, promoting a brand, showing their daily life, etc.; in short, almost any activity.

TikToks can be set to music, with songs that usually are on trend. Thus, they may come into conflict with the patrimonial rights of the author’s song. In other words, the user can incorporate a different work in their TikTok.

Users can join ‘trends’, which are national or international trends in the social network created by TikTok users, and are then able to give a personal touch to the trend.

Therefore, it is worth asking whether TikToks are truly original or whether they are reproductions or transformations of a previous TikTok. In other words, is a TikTok an original or a derivative work? In this regard, the works protected by the FCL are those of original creation that are susceptible to being disclosed or reproduced in any form or media and their protection is granted from the moment they have been fixed in a material support, regardless of the merit, destination, or the method of expression.

Therefore, Tik Toks are audiovisual works protected by the FCL. Regardless of their registration with the National Copyright Institute, when fixed on a material support and according to their originality, they will be more or less protected by the FCL, without disregarding a third-party copyright that may be involved in a TikTok.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

VO, which has offices in the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany, is the second European IP firm to secure external backing this week
The Bardehle Pagenberg attorneys-at-law discuss the firm’s Managing IP EMEA Awards 2026 success, Unified Patent Court litigation strategy, and evolving European patent trends
A patent battle between two legal tech companies and a loss for Elon Musk’s xAI against OpenAI were also among the top talking points
With drug prices a hot topic in the US, courts are seemingly more reluctant to prevent the entry of generics to the market
Academic Eden Sarid joins us during Pride Month to discuss queer expression and IP law, Patagonia v Pattie Gonia, and how queer and AI-generated creations both pose novelty concerns
Patent attorney Michael Henson joins the firm to lead its freshly launched blockchain and digital assets practice
A dispute over mammogram technology, and a development in the case between GSK and Moderna were also among the top talking points in recent weeks
With rankings for Western Europe set to be published on June 25, we sat down with our research lead to find out what practitioners and law firms can expect
Peter O’Sullivan, a professional services executive, says he is looking forward to helping Pearce IP become the leading life sciences firm in Australia and New Zealand
Matteo Di Lernia, advocate at LCA Studio Legale, unpicks the CJEU’s ruling in M.M. Ristorazione v Villa Ramazzini, including its impact on litigation strategies
Gift this article