An encouraging Greek trademark ruling

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

An encouraging Greek trademark ruling

Sponsored by

patrinos-logo.png
justice-2060093.jpg

Maria Kilimiris of Patrinos & Kilimiris commends the approach taken by the Administrative Trademarks Commission in assessing the similarity of marks involving figurative elements and words

In a recent judgment in an opposition case before the Greek Trademarks Office, the Administrative Trademarks Commission issued a decision reaffirming the similarity between composite marks containing figurative elements and words.

The opponent is the owner of the following series of trademarks:

Patrinos1.jpg

The contested application was the following:

Patrinos5.jpg

In its ruling, the Administrative Trademarks Commission described the figurative elements of the marks in detail, as follows: “The dominant element of the marks under comparison is the depiction of two polo players on horseback, facing forward in an instance of action from the game. Indeed, the compared representations are also substantially similar in their individual characteristics, since they are in black and white (background) and the players are shown on horses galloping forwards, wielding mallets in an active snapshot of the game, one of which is shown in a bottom-up position (with its base at the top) and the other in a top-down position (with its base at the bottom).

“The said representation is in the centre of the opposed mark and is more than four times the size of the words in the same mark. It, therefore, follows the corresponding pattern of the opponent's earlier marks, where the essentially identical representation is the dominant element, both because of its position and because of its size.”

In addition, regarding the word elements of the marks in question, the decision concluded: “Given the length of the set of verbal elements comprising the contested trademark, it is reasonable that the average consumer will be content to pronounce the verbal element which appears first, namely the word ‘Dipolon’. […]

“The average consumer will therefore understand that this word is conceptually linked to the dominant representation, namely polo, and is substantially similar to the word ‘Polo’ in the opponent's marks, which is also conceptually linked to the dominant representation of the opponent's marks as described above.”

The Administrative Trademarks Commission reached these conclusions not only citing settled EU case law (T-168/04, C-342/97, C-498/07, T-581/13, etc.) but also stressing that the aforementioned jurisprudential principles applied in Greece long before the aforementioned EU case law.

It is very reassuring that the Administrative Trademarks Commission has issued such a well-reasoned decision, with extensive references to, and descriptions of, the respective marks, and showing a thorough knowledge of EU and national case law. It is hoped that this will set a precedent for future decisions issued by the Greek Trademarks Office.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Deborah Kirk discusses why IP and technology have become central pillars in transactions and explains why clients need practically minded lawyers
IP STARS, Managing IP’s accreditation title, reveals its latest rankings for patent work, including which firms are moving up
Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
Gift this article