An encouraging Greek trademark ruling

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

An encouraging Greek trademark ruling

Sponsored by

patrinos-logo.png
justice-2060093.jpg

Maria Kilimiris of Patrinos & Kilimiris commends the approach taken by the Administrative Trademarks Commission in assessing the similarity of marks involving figurative elements and words

In a recent judgment in an opposition case before the Greek Trademarks Office, the Administrative Trademarks Commission issued a decision reaffirming the similarity between composite marks containing figurative elements and words.

The opponent is the owner of the following series of trademarks:

Patrinos1.jpg

The contested application was the following:

Patrinos5.jpg

In its ruling, the Administrative Trademarks Commission described the figurative elements of the marks in detail, as follows: “The dominant element of the marks under comparison is the depiction of two polo players on horseback, facing forward in an instance of action from the game. Indeed, the compared representations are also substantially similar in their individual characteristics, since they are in black and white (background) and the players are shown on horses galloping forwards, wielding mallets in an active snapshot of the game, one of which is shown in a bottom-up position (with its base at the top) and the other in a top-down position (with its base at the bottom).

“The said representation is in the centre of the opposed mark and is more than four times the size of the words in the same mark. It, therefore, follows the corresponding pattern of the opponent's earlier marks, where the essentially identical representation is the dominant element, both because of its position and because of its size.”

In addition, regarding the word elements of the marks in question, the decision concluded: “Given the length of the set of verbal elements comprising the contested trademark, it is reasonable that the average consumer will be content to pronounce the verbal element which appears first, namely the word ‘Dipolon’. […]

“The average consumer will therefore understand that this word is conceptually linked to the dominant representation, namely polo, and is substantially similar to the word ‘Polo’ in the opponent's marks, which is also conceptually linked to the dominant representation of the opponent's marks as described above.”

The Administrative Trademarks Commission reached these conclusions not only citing settled EU case law (T-168/04, C-342/97, C-498/07, T-581/13, etc.) but also stressing that the aforementioned jurisprudential principles applied in Greece long before the aforementioned EU case law.

It is very reassuring that the Administrative Trademarks Commission has issued such a well-reasoned decision, with extensive references to, and descriptions of, the respective marks, and showing a thorough knowledge of EU and national case law. It is hoped that this will set a precedent for future decisions issued by the Greek Trademarks Office.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Angela Oliver shares tips for preparing oral arguments, and reveals her passion for marine biology
The Getty Images v Stability AI case, which will hear untested points of law, is a reminder of the importance of the legal system and the excitement it can generate
Firms explain the IP concerns that can arise amid attempts by brands to show off their ‘Canadianness’ to consumers
Counsel say they will be monitoring issues such as the placement of house marks, and how Mondelēz demonstrates a likelihood of confusion in its dispute with Aldi
The EUIPO expanding its mediation services and a new Riyadh office for Simmons & Simmons were also among the top talking points this week
David Boundy explains why Pierson Ferdinand provides a platform that will allow him to use administrative law to address IP concerns
Developments included an anti-anti-suit injunction being granted for the first time, and the court clarifying that it can adjudicate over alleged infringements that occurred before June 2023
Griffith Hack’s Amanda Stark, one of our ‘Top 250 Women in IP’, explains how peer support from male colleagues is crucial, and reveals why the life sciences sector is thriving
The case, which could offer clarity on the training of AI models within the context of copyright law, will go to trial in the UK next week
CMS IndusLaw co-founder Suneeth Katarki says he plans to hire a patent team in India and argues that IP should play a major role within full-service firms
Gift this article