Five minutes with…Loes van den Winkel, Arnold & Siedsma

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Five minutes with…Loes van den Winkel, Arnold & Siedsma

Loes-van-den-Winkel border.png

Loes van den Winkel, attorney at Arnold & Siedsma, explains why clients' enthusiasm is contagious and why her job does not mean managing fashion models

Welcome to the latest instalment of Managing IP’s ‘Five minutes with’ series, where we learn more about IP practitioners on a personal as well as a professional level. This time we have Loes van den Winkel, a trademark and design attorney at Arnold & Siedsma in the Netherlands

Someone asks you at a party what you do for a living. What do you say?

I am a trademark and design attorney, meaning that I help companies protect and defend their intellectual creations, be it a name, logo, or a newly designed chair or coffee machine.

In Dutch my profession is called ‘merken en modellengemachtigde’. ‘Modellen’ translates to both ‘designs’ and ‘(fashion) models’. Some people think I manage fashion models and they are rather disappointed when I tell them that I am just a boring lawyer.

Talk us through a typical working day.

I don’t think there are ‘typical’ working days in our profession, although it is quite typical that the day you had planned will change throughout the day, sometimes after the first glance of emails in the morning. Tasks typically include meetings with clients, visiting an incubator, reviewing an existing IP portfolio, discussing the content of an IP event, and preparing arguments.

What are you working on at the moment?

I feel like I am always working on a hundred things at once. I am working with a start-up that is filing its first trademarks and designs, a tech company that already owns an extensive patent portfolio and is currently exploring trademark protection, two high-tech companies for which we filed several applications in recent years that are now in the prosecution phase, as well as an EU cancellation procedure.

Does one big piece of work usually take priority or are you juggling multiple things?

From my previous answer, it will be clear that I am always juggling multiple things. This suits me well and is one of the reasons why I like my profession. Of course, there are some bigger tasks, such as preparing arguments or an agreement, that take priority over smaller tasks, but I am rather happy that my work consists of both types of tasks.

What is the most exciting aspect of your role and what is the most stressful?

The most exciting part is meeting with a client that has developed a new product or service. Their excitement about their product or service is very contagious and stimulates me to help them to maximise value.

At times the workload is quite challenging. Being able to prioritise is key.

Tell us the key characteristics that make a successful IP lawyer/practitioner.

A successful trademark and design attorney can get a good understanding of what the client wants and then translate that into practical advice. Being upfront and telling your client when they are better of not doing something, for example filing an application or opposition, is part of that.

What is the most common misconception about IP?

That it only costs money. From the perspective of a start-up, I can see why it’s hard to understand the value of IP protection, as it’s intangible. If you obtain a trademark registration and you never have to enforce it, it may seem like mere costs rather than value.

But as IP lawyers we all know examples of companies that thought about IP protection too late, or, in contrast, a company that did think about it and was able to sell the company for a higher price due to their IP.

It is our task to educate our clients in that respect.

What or who inspires you?

Young entrepreneurs who soak up our advice and take their first steps with us in protecting their IP.

If you weren’t in IP, what would you be doing?

I would probably be a consultant in some sense. Helping clients is what gives me energy, so if my advice did not relate to IP, it could be anything else, from finance to marketing and everything in between.

Any advice you would give your younger self?

When I first started to apply for jobs after I graduated from law school, and I asked friends and acquaintances who seemed content in their roles how they landed their roles, the most common answer was that it was more or less by chance.

This happened to me, too. I would advise my younger self to trust that you will be led to a role you will be happy in.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Junior lawyers aren’t unwilling to work hard, as some seniors believe; rather, they are rejecting traditional career advancement models that have limited payoff
Rebekah Gay discusses overcoming self-doubt, supporting the next generation of women lawyers, and how changing client demands are reshaping IP practice
New filing data suggests Germany's grip on UPC litigation remains strong, while Bardehle Pagenberg, Arnold Ruess, Hogan Lovells and Carpmaels notch up notable cases
In 27 years, KASS has expanded to seven countries in southeast Asia and is now eyeing further growth opportunities. Its CEO shares her perspective
Mine Güner discusses bridging law and business, taking the initiative, and why Taylor Swift helped put copyright on the map
Cindy Goh discusses why she launched Cheang & Ariff's IP department, the improving litigation environment in Malaysia and what to consider when using AI
Increased focus on adding patent litigation depth to the firm’s Dallas office was behind the boutique’s most recent hires
IPH's Canadian acquisitions are paying off on paper, but a couple of strong years may not be enough to show that the group's strategy has truly won over the market
Examiner statistics could help patent prosecution practitioners tailor strategies, turning an area of high variability into a potential competitive advantage
The England and Wales High Court’s ruling in Accord v Novartis may not rewrite the law on plausibility, but it does signal a pragmatic approach that could provide greater certainty for life sciences innovators
Gift this article