Five minutes with … Parminder Lally, Appleyard Lees

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Five minutes with … Parminder Lally, Appleyard Lees

Parminder-Lally border.png

Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer about their life and career

Welcome to the latest instalment of Managing IP’s ‘Five minutes with’ series, where we learn more about IP lawyers on a personal as well as a professional level. This time we have Parminder Lally, partner at Appleyard Lees in Cambridge.

Someone asks you at a party what you do for a living. What do you say?

Oh gosh, tricky question. When I was a student and I told people I was studying physics, they’d often respond with how they hated the subject at school. Now, if I say I’m a lawyer, people usually tell me about their divorce! So, I’ve learned to keep it simple: I’m a patent attorney, and I help companies protect their clever new products and inventions.

Talk us through a typical working day.

My days tend to vary depending on whether I’m working from home or in the office. When I’m at home, I focus on the work that needs the most concentration: patent drafting or dealing with tricky patent office objections.

The in-office days are much more collaborative – I’ll often schedule meetings with clients then spend time talking to my trainees and going over the work they’re doing with me, and talk to colleagues about our business development activities. They’re also when I set the weekly riddle for the office!

What are you working on at the moment?

Currently, I’m working on a new patent application which is for a super clever, but very mathematics-heavy, machine-learning based invention. I need to spend time thinking about how to write the claims so that the invention is considered patent eligible by the UKIPO, EPO and USPTO.

Does one big piece of work usually take priority or are you juggling multiple things?

I’m often doing multiple things – I expect that’s true for many patent attorneys. This week, I’ve done patent prosecution work for cases relating to bioinformatics, automatic speech recognition, and machine learning model training.

I've also done patent drafting, business development, work around recruitment, and some training with my trainees. I like the variety in the type of work I do, the types of inventions I handle, and the clients I work with.

What is the most exciting aspect of your role and what is the most stressful?

I still get a thrill whenever I find out that a patent application I’ve been working on is going to be granted! I hope that never stops being exciting! The thrill is probably a bit because of imposter syndrome too. There are lots of other things I get joy from. For example, when my trainees have made a really good argument, or explained something confidently in a client meeting, or done well in their exams, I am usually sat at my desk beaming because their hard work is paying-off for them.

The most stressful is the deadlines – it’s an extremely deadline-driven job. That’s why I’m really glad that IP Inclusive has arranged webinars on mental health and managing stress, and that firms in the UK are looking at looking at these issues too.

Tell us the key characteristics that make a successful IP lawyer/practitioner.

A good patent attorney should be able to communicate clearly and appropriately. For instance, we need to be able to write about a complex invention in a clear, concise way, so it can be understood by the inventors when they review our drafts, so that the patent office examiners can understand it, and so that it can be translated into other languages.

We also need to be able to explain what’s going on during the patent process to our clients clearly, taking into consideration that clients have differing levels of knowledge of patent law and jargon. Patent law is not the place to unleash your inner Charles Dickens!

What is the most common misconception about IP?

In my specific area of patent law, the most common misconception is around software, i.e. that it cannot be patented or that you can only patent it in the US. I’ve given lots of talks and written many articles about this, as it seems to be a rather persistent myth!

What or who inspires you?

People who stand up for what they believe in, even if doing so is difficult. In the IP world, I think everyone who challenges the status quo is admirable. Andrea Brewster will always be a hero to me for the work she started in 2015 to tackle the equality, diversity, inclusion and wellbeing issues in the UK’s IP profession. But I also admire those who ask tricky or provocative questions, and they’ve given me the confidence to ask those questions too.

If you weren’t in IP, what would you be doing?

Probably a baker or a gardener. Yup, quite different!

Any advice you would give your younger self?

Read as many books as you can before you become a patent attorney! Once you become one, your days of agonising over the words you write will mean reading for pleasure becomes a bit of chore.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Jason Raeburn’s arrival will expand the firm’s London footprint in AI, copyright and tech disputes
The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, Eltemate
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
The chief technology officer remit, which has been created as the firm is building its litigation team, will include expanding the use of AI in patent and legal work and automating manual processes
Former Hoyng Rokh Moneiger partner Laura Alonso, who brought her team to ECIJA in March, discusses plans to expand further and why ECIJA’s ‘IP DNA’ is helping broaden her work
Amita Haylock discusses building an integrated Asia practice as clients increasingly demand that firms combine IP, technology and data expertise
Gift this article