Getty v Stability AI: UK judge tees up seminal AI trial

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Getty v Stability AI: UK judge tees up seminal AI trial

Rolls 2k-comp.jpg

Mrs Justice Joanna Smith identified inconsistencies between evidence given by Stability AI’s CEO and comments he made in the media

Getty Images’ copyright lawsuit against the developers of generative artificial intelligence tool Stable Diffusion will go to trial after a UK judge found some of the claims had a real chance of success.

In a decision issued on Friday, December 1, Mrs Justice Joanna Smith at the England and Wales High Court rejected Stability AI’s request to throw out Getty’s claims on summary judgment.

According to the lawsuit, Stability AI, which created Stable Diffusion, had scraped “millions of images” from Getty’s library of stock images and used them to train its AI tool.

Mohammad Mostaque, CEO of UK-based Stability AI, told the court the case shouldn’t be heard in the UK because no employees there had ever worked on Stable Diffusion.

In her judgment, however, Smith pointed out that Mostaque had claimed in an interview that the company had brought Russian and Ukrainian software developers to the UK to work on its products, potentially including Stable Diffusion.

There was also a real question as to whether Mostaque himself may have worked on Stable Diffusion while based in the UK, Smith added.

The judge found each of the Getty claims that had been challenged by Stability AI had a real prospect of success and should go to trial.

The judgment comes as pressure mounts on Stability AI’s leadership.

Bloomberg reported last week the company’s leaders had offered the company for sale to potential investors.

According to the same report, Investor fund Coatue also called for Mostaque to resign as CEO over concerns about his leadership and Stability AI’s financial performance.

On November 15, Ed Newton-Rex resigned from his post as vice president of audio at Stability AI, apparently at concerns over its misuse of copyright-protected material.

“To be clear, I’m a supporter of generative AI. It will have many benefits — that’s why I’ve worked on it for 13 years. But I can only support generative AI that doesn’t exploit creators by training models — which may replace them — on their work without permission,” Newton-Rex wrote.

Getty is represented in the UK litigation by Fieldfisher, and Stability AI by Bird & Bird.

Lindsay Lane KC and Jessie Bowhill, instructed by Fieldfisher, appeared for Getty Images. Nicholas Saunders KC and Jaani Riordan, instructed by Bird & Bird, acted for Stability AI.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Earlier this month, Managing IP had exclusively reported that the French arm of Taylor Wessing was minded to pull out of the deal
Our latest podcast examines how Weil’s IP practice evolved, where its practitioners could (and will) go next, and which firms and markets stand to benefit from the redistribution of talent
Former Latham partner Chris Henry and transactions lawyer Liza Cotter are heading to the firm as Weil’s IP practice starts to disperse
Rival IP teams return to court for a closely watched appeal over AI and copyright, but observers hoping for answers to some of the technology’s biggest legal questions may be left disappointed
Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
Gift this article