Getty v Stability AI: UK judge tees up seminal AI trial
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Getty v Stability AI: UK judge tees up seminal AI trial

Rolls 2k-comp.jpg

Mrs Justice Joanna Smith identified inconsistencies between evidence given by Stability AI’s CEO and comments he made in the media

Getty Images’ copyright lawsuit against the developers of generative artificial intelligence tool Stable Diffusion will go to trial after a UK judge found some of the claims had a real chance of success.

In a decision issued on Friday, December 1, Mrs Justice Joanna Smith at the England and Wales High Court rejected Stability AI’s request to throw out Getty’s claims on summary judgment.

According to the lawsuit, Stability AI, which created Stable Diffusion, had scraped “millions of images” from Getty’s library of stock images and used them to train its AI tool.

Mohammad Mostaque, CEO of UK-based Stability AI, told the court the case shouldn’t be heard in the UK because no employees there had ever worked on Stable Diffusion.

In her judgment, however, Smith pointed out that Mostaque had claimed in an interview that the company had brought Russian and Ukrainian software developers to the UK to work on its products, potentially including Stable Diffusion.

There was also a real question as to whether Mostaque himself may have worked on Stable Diffusion while based in the UK, Smith added.

The judge found each of the Getty claims that had been challenged by Stability AI had a real prospect of success and should go to trial.

The judgment comes as pressure mounts on Stability AI’s leadership.

Bloombergreported last week the company’s leaders had offered the company for sale to potential investors.

According to the same report, Investor fund Coatue also called for Mostaque to resign as CEO over concerns about his leadership and Stability AI’s financial performance.

On November 15, Ed Newton-Rex resigned from his post as vice president of audio at Stability AI, apparently at concerns over its misuse of copyright-protected material.

“To be clear, I’m a supporter of generative AI. It will have many benefits — that’s why I’ve worked on it for 13 years. But I can only support generative AI that doesn’t exploit creators by training models — which may replace them — on their work without permission,” Newton-Rex wrote.

Getty is represented in the UK litigation by Fieldfisher, and Stability AI by Bird & Bird.

Lindsay Lane KC and Jessie Bowhill, instructed by Fieldfisher, appeared for Getty Images. Nicholas Saunders KC and Jaani Riordan, instructed by Bird & Bird, acted for Stability AI.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

High-earning businesses place most value on the depth of the external legal teams advising them, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Kilpatrick Townsend was recognised as Americas firm of the year, while patent powerhouse James Haley won a lifetime achievement award
Partners at Foley Hoag and Kilburn & Strode explore how US and UK courts have addressed questions of AI and inventorship
In-house lawyers have considerable influence over law firms’ actions, so they must use that power to push their external advisers to adopt sustainable practices
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Counsel say they’re advising clients to keep a close eye on confidentiality agreements after the FTC voted to ban non-competes
Data from Managing IP+’s Talent Tracker shows US firms making major swoops for IP teams, while South Korea has also been a buoyant market
The finalists for the 13th annual awards have been announced
Counsel reveal how a proposal to create separate briefings for discretionary denials at the USPTO could affect their PTAB strategies
The UK Supreme Court rejected the firm’s appeal against an earlier ruling because it did not raise an arguable point of law
Gift this article