Five minutes with … Paul Keller, Crowell & Moring

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Five minutes with … Paul Keller, Crowell & Moring

Keller-Paul_Headshot.jpg

Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career

Welcome to the latest instalment of Managing IP’s ‘Five minutes with’ series, where we learn more about IP practitioners on a personal as well as a professional level. This time we have Paul Keller, partner at Crowell & Moring in New York.

Someone asks you at a party what you do for a living. What do you say?

I’m in conflict resolution surrounding issues involving technology. 

Talk us through a typical working day.

Usually responding to emails before my feet hit the floor. Addressing any issues raised by opposing counsel during the day, listening and responding to the needs of my clients, considering what additional value I can bring to my relationships and the firm, and attending to the growth and development of my associates. Walk the dog.

What are you working on at the moment? 

A number of trade secrets and patent infringement matters, spanning technologies from data transmission to copper mining, recycling to tax calculations, and transportation tech.

Does one big piece of work usually take priority or are you juggling multiple things?

It changes over time. At any one instance, one particular fire may require more of my attention than the others, but that cycle can quickly change and another fire takes over.

What is the most exciting aspect of your role and what is the most stressful? 

The most exciting aspect of my role is when a third party, a judge, or a jury decides that our position is the correct one. This can be on issues as small as a discovery dispute and as significant as a jury trial. Regardless, when it happens, it is exhilarating. The most stressful is all the other times before that decision.

Tell us the key characteristics that make a successful IP lawyer.

Listening, responsiveness, critical writing skills, and curiosity. 

What is the most common misconception about IP?

That you need to have a science degree to do the job. It helps, certainly, but it is not a prerequisite.

What or who inspires you?

My colleagues and family inspire me almost every day – from their own accomplishments and teaching me new skills, to setting the aspirational goals even higher.

If you weren’t an IP lawyer, what would you be doing?

Managing a high-end boutique hotel somewhere in Europe.

Any advice you would give your younger self?

Step out of your comfort zone earlier. You’re a kid from the Catskills – you’ve got a lot to see and do, so get started.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Boehringer Ingelheim has instructed a team from Kirkland, while Teva is being represented by Pinsent Masons
The Delhi High Court’s latest directions offer an opportunity to move beyond remedies against bad-faith registrations and address how suspicious applications are identified in the first place, says Fatima Baig at Lexlinc
Camilla Hamrin describes how the acquisition by Acapo Onsagers will impact Bergenstråhle’s trademark practice – and reflects on changes she has seen over 30 years in IP
On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Jason Raeburn’s arrival will expand the firm’s London footprint in AI, copyright and tech disputes
The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, Eltemate
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
Gift this article