Five minutes with … Paul Keller, Crowell & Moring

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Five minutes with … Paul Keller, Crowell & Moring

Keller-Paul_Headshot.jpg

Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career

Welcome to the latest instalment of Managing IP’s ‘Five minutes with’ series, where we learn more about IP practitioners on a personal as well as a professional level. This time we have Paul Keller, partner at Crowell & Moring in New York.

Someone asks you at a party what you do for a living. What do you say?

I’m in conflict resolution surrounding issues involving technology. 

Talk us through a typical working day.

Usually responding to emails before my feet hit the floor. Addressing any issues raised by opposing counsel during the day, listening and responding to the needs of my clients, considering what additional value I can bring to my relationships and the firm, and attending to the growth and development of my associates. Walk the dog.

What are you working on at the moment? 

A number of trade secrets and patent infringement matters, spanning technologies from data transmission to copper mining, recycling to tax calculations, and transportation tech.

Does one big piece of work usually take priority or are you juggling multiple things?

It changes over time. At any one instance, one particular fire may require more of my attention than the others, but that cycle can quickly change and another fire takes over.

What is the most exciting aspect of your role and what is the most stressful? 

The most exciting aspect of my role is when a third party, a judge, or a jury decides that our position is the correct one. This can be on issues as small as a discovery dispute and as significant as a jury trial. Regardless, when it happens, it is exhilarating. The most stressful is all the other times before that decision.

Tell us the key characteristics that make a successful IP lawyer.

Listening, responsiveness, critical writing skills, and curiosity. 

What is the most common misconception about IP?

That you need to have a science degree to do the job. It helps, certainly, but it is not a prerequisite.

What or who inspires you?

My colleagues and family inspire me almost every day – from their own accomplishments and teaching me new skills, to setting the aspirational goals even higher.

If you weren’t an IP lawyer, what would you be doing?

Managing a high-end boutique hotel somewhere in Europe.

Any advice you would give your younger self?

Step out of your comfort zone earlier. You’re a kid from the Catskills – you’ve got a lot to see and do, so get started.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

IP STARS, Managing IP’s accreditation title, reveals its latest rankings for patent work, including which firms are moving up
Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
In Iconix v Dream Pairs, the Supreme Court said the Court of Appeal was wrong to interfere with an earlier ruling, prompting questions about the appeal court’s remit
Gift this article