Overview of recent updates to Indonesia’s IP e-filing system

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Overview of recent updates to Indonesia’s IP e-filing system

Sponsored by

tillekegibbins.png
lightbulb-1875247.jpg

Wongrat Ratanaprayul of Tilleke & Gibbins outlines the key changes to Indonesia’s IP e-filing system, and how applicants can best prepare for the updates

In its ongoing efforts to enhance Indonesia’s intellectual property e-filing system, the country’s Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP) has consistently introduced improvements to the online system. In recent months, the DGIP has implemented several noteworthy changes that differ from previous versions of the system. These changes bear significant importance for applicants who intend to file IP applications, and include the changes highlighted below for designs, patents, and trademarks.

Designs

File format and view limitation

Under current rules, all design drawings must be submitted in JPG format, and only one view is permitted per page.

No refund requests

Once the application payment has been made, refund requests are no longer an option.

Figure limitation

Only one figure is allowed for each design view, with an exception made for reference and perspective views.

Patents

Title consistency

If an invention is already registered outside Indonesia through the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), the title in the Indonesian registration application must match the title registered with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).

Bibliographic data matching

In national phase applications, it is essential for all bibliographic data to mirror the information from the PCT international phase as listed on WIPO’s website. This conformity is crucial for a seamless application process.

Excess claim fees

A new requirement stipulates that excess claim fees must be paid at the time of filing the patent application.

Trademarks

Goods and services selection

The DGIP requires applicants to choose their desired goods and services from a predefined list, and the provided list is not editable. The DGIP periodically updates this list, but there is no fixed schedule for these updates. Moreover, these updates can sometimes entail removal of items from the list, and requesting the addition of goods or services is often challenging, especially if a similar alternative already exists in the list. Therefore, it is imperative for applicants to promptly decide on their chosen goods and services before the list undergoes updates.

Non-amendable choices

Once government fees have been paid, the selection of goods or services cannot be amended, even if the application has not yet been submitted.

Renewal grace period restrictions

If a trademark registration is past its expiration date but is still in the renewal grace period, it is not possible to submit any recordal of name change, address change, or assignment. Holders of trademark registrations in Indonesia thus need to keep their registrations current in order to file these recordals freely.

Using the E-Filing System

For seamless submission of their IP applications, applicants need to keep these important points in mind—and be aware that additional updates and adjustments are likely to be ongoing. The DGIP has demonstrated its commitment to enhancing its e-filing system through fixes and changes such as those described in this article. Prospective applicants should work with local experts familiar with the latest practices and requirements of the system. Such local agents and advisors can help businesses and other IP applicants avoid potentially costly delays so that they can secure and capitalise on their intellectual assets without delay.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Apple’s lawsuit against OpenAI, which features Tier 1-ranked disputes firms on both sides, reflects how trade secrets litigation is becoming a prominent competition feature
Drew & Napier’s leadership appointments show one way full-service firms can back up claims about the strategic importance of IP
Strike-out application will hear claims that the copyright aspect of an IP infringement claim brought by a gambling and sports betting group should be dropped
Amongst a sea of mergers, Lathrop GPM and HG Law have set out plans to combine, positioning themselves to compete with both IP boutiques and full-service firms
Patrícia Paias explains why she loves the science and business behind an idea and why potential rights owners must avoid the ‘file and forget’ philosophy
Lawyers eagerly await news of what IP specialist Sir Colin Birss will bring to one of the England and Wales judiciary’s most important roles
María Aurora García of Berken IP explains how intellectual property rights holders can use customs monitoring and online enforcement tools to identify parallel imports and support compliance with consumer protection rules
The Jakarta-based firm says personal networks and a distinctive strategy can help it guide foreign clients through what can be a tricky IP landscape
Munich litigation boutique formed by former Taylor Wessing partners continues expansion as it seeks to cement its position in the UPC market
Yvonne Tang and Siau Wen Lim, the second and third IP specialists to sit on the firm’s management committee, say IP is ‘uniquely positioned’ to support cross-practice work
Gift this article