Overview of recent updates to Indonesia’s IP e-filing system
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement
Expert AnalysisLocal Insights

Overview of recent updates to Indonesia’s IP e-filing system

Sponsored by


Wongrat Ratanaprayul of Tilleke & Gibbins outlines the key changes to Indonesia’s IP e-filing system, and how applicants can best prepare for the updates

In its ongoing efforts to enhance Indonesia’s intellectual property e-filing system, the country’s Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP) has consistently introduced improvements to the online system. In recent months, the DGIP has implemented several noteworthy changes that differ from previous versions of the system. These changes bear significant importance for applicants who intend to file IP applications, and include the changes highlighted below for designs, patents, and trademarks.


File format and view limitation

Under current rules, all design drawings must be submitted in JPG format, and only one view is permitted per page.

No refund requests

Once the application payment has been made, refund requests are no longer an option.

Figure limitation

Only one figure is allowed for each design view, with an exception made for reference and perspective views.


Title consistency

If an invention is already registered outside Indonesia through the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), the title in the Indonesian registration application must match the title registered with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).

Bibliographic data matching

In national phase applications, it is essential for all bibliographic data to mirror the information from the PCT international phase as listed on WIPO’s website. This conformity is crucial for a seamless application process.

Excess claim fees

A new requirement stipulates that excess claim fees must be paid at the time of filing the patent application.


Goods and services selection

The DGIP requires applicants to choose their desired goods and services from a predefined list, and the provided list is not editable. The DGIP periodically updates this list, but there is no fixed schedule for these updates. Moreover, these updates can sometimes entail removal of items from the list, and requesting the addition of goods or services is often challenging, especially if a similar alternative already exists in the list. Therefore, it is imperative for applicants to promptly decide on their chosen goods and services before the list undergoes updates.

Non-amendable choices

Once government fees have been paid, the selection of goods or services cannot be amended, even if the application has not yet been submitted.

Renewal grace period restrictions

If a trademark registration is past its expiration date but is still in the renewal grace period, it is not possible to submit any recordal of name change, address change, or assignment. Holders of trademark registrations in Indonesia thus need to keep their registrations current in order to file these recordals freely.

Using the E-Filing System

For seamless submission of their IP applications, applicants need to keep these important points in mind—and be aware that additional updates and adjustments are likely to be ongoing. The DGIP has demonstrated its commitment to enhancing its e-filing system through fixes and changes such as those described in this article. Prospective applicants should work with local experts familiar with the latest practices and requirements of the system. Such local agents and advisors can help businesses and other IP applicants avoid potentially costly delays so that they can secure and capitalise on their intellectual assets without delay.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

In a seminal ruling, the Beijing Internet Court said images generated by Stable Diffusion counted as original works
Boston-based John Lanza is hoping to work more with life sciences colleagues on the ‘exciting’ application of AI to drug discovery
The Delhi High Court has expressed its willingness to set global licensing terms in the Nokia-Oppo dispute, but it must deal with longstanding problems first
Some patent counsel are still encountering errors even though the USPTO has fully transitioned to the new system
A senior USPTO attorney spoke at a Nokia-sponsored event on the EU’s proposed SEP Regulation today, November 29
IP counsel are ‘flooded’ with queries from clients worried about deepfakes, but the law has so far come up short
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career
Mathys & Squire has filed a test case that the firm hopes will make UPC pleadings available by default
Multiple representatives and their teams can now work on cases using the online CMS, but not everyone can submit documents
James Lawrence, partner at Addisons, explains how he convinced the full Federal Court of Australia to back his client in a patent dispute concerning mining safety equipment