Trademarks in Africa: bringing clarity to a complicated picture

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Trademarks in Africa: bringing clarity to a complicated picture

Sponsored by

spoor-fisher-400px.png
globe-3559726.jpg

Matthew Costard and Nola Pontes of Spoor & Fisher Jersey look at some of the issues that arise with trademark searching in countries that form the continent of Africa

Not yet digital

There are still countries in Africa that have not yet digitised their trademark records. These are Burundi, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Sierra Leone.

It may be digital, but is it complete?

The answer’s no – in the following African countries, electronic searches need to be supplemented by manual searches: Ghana, Nigeria, Sudan, Tanzania and Zimbabwe.

It should be noted that in Sudan, searches cannot be undertaken at present due to the ongoing unrest, but national trademarks are searched manually and international registrations electronically.

Restricted access to electronic databases

In Nigeria and Tanzania, access to the electronic database is restricted. In the case of Nigeria, the electronic register is incomplete, whereas in Tanzania, only Tanzanian nationals can access the records.

Madrid not showing

Ghana and Sierra Leone belong to the Madrid Protocol, yet international registrations designating these countries do not appear in the national databases.

Examination for prior rights

Prior rights examination does not occur in all of Africa, but it does (to a varying degree) in the following jurisdictions: Algeria, Angola, Botswana, Burundi, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt, Ethiopia, The Gambia, Ghana, Kenya, Libya, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria, the African Intellectual Property Organisation (or OAPI, the regional registration system that covers Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, the Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Guinea (Conakry), Guinea-Bissau, Côte d'Ivoire, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Senegal and Togo), Rwanda, Seychelles, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda (where a pre-filing search is mandatory), Zambia and Zimbabwe.

It can be tricky in…

Madagascar, where the only recourse to a registry refusal is an appeal to a court of first instance, followed by a final decision by an appeal court; Sudan, where a registry refusal is likewise referred to a court; and Libya, where appeals must be submitted to a designated committee that has never convened.

Journals

In Africa, there is often a long delay between filing and publication – 24 months is not uncommon. This can make relying on published applications risky, particularly in the following jurisdictions: Ethiopia, The Gambia, Ghana, Libya, Malawi, Nigeria, OAPI, Sierra Leone, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Tim Gilman, who joined Kasowitz alongside three other partners, says he is excited to be part of the firm’s ‘elite’ litigation team
A backlash against a White House video promoting deportation and Casalonga opening a new office in Düsseldorf were also among the top talking points
The firm has brought on board two counsel and an associate to complement two previously revealed partner hires
Bradford Newman, who has joined the firm’s new Silicon Valley office as head of complex technology disputes, discusses plans to build the practice group and attract local talent
Managing IP summarises the highlights from the IP STARS rankings for copyright and IP transactions work, the final firm rankings release of the year
Developments included the first judgment from the Nordic Baltic division, an injunction covering the UK, and a new code of conduct
Alston & Bird acted for InterDigital, while Samsung was represented by Fish & Richardson, during the arbitration process
Powell Gilbert lawyers reveal how they navigated parallel EPO proceedings and collaborated with European peers to come out on top in the Nordic-Baltic Division’s first judgment
The firms posted increases in revenue and profit per equity partner, with both giving a nod to their IP expertise
EasyGroup, the owner of the easyJet airline, said in a press release that UK-based first-instance judges are “less experienced”, bringing a long-running debate back to the fore
Gift this article