Philippines: accession to the Hague Agreement

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Philippines: accession to the Hague Agreement

Sponsored by

hechanova-400px.png
manila-1709394.jpg

Editha Hechanova of Hechanova Group outlines the potential benefits for Philippines’ design rights holders if the country follows through with its planned accession to the Hague Agreement

On August 29, 2023, the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL) conducted a public consultation regarding the planned accession to the WIPO Hague Agreement for the International Registration of Industrial Designs. The Hague Agreement, which has 96 member countries and 79 contracting parties, provides for an international mechanism called the Hague System to simultaneously secure and manage design rights in different jurisdictions.

At present, nationals or residents of the Philippines who wish to protect their design rights in markets of interest must file separate applications in their desired countries, which may have different translation requirements, fees, and procedures as provided by the Paris Convention, of which the Philippines is a signatory. Under the Hague System, the procedure is simplified since there is a single application, a choice of one language (likely English), one currency for fees (Swiss Francs), centralised management, and greater flexibility since the design rights holders can target national, regional or global markets.

Right now, in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) region the following countries have already joined the Hague Agreement: Brunei, Cambodia, Singapore and Vietnam. Embodied in the ASEAN IPR Action Plan for 2016-2025 is its strategic goal to accede to international treaties such as the Madrid Protocol, the Hague Agreement and the Patent Cooperation Treaty. In line with the ASEAN’s goal to transform itself into an “innovative and competitive region thru the use of intellectual property”, the Philippines thru the IPOPHL has drawn a roadmap for its accession to the Hague Agreement:

figure 1.png

The IPOPHL aims to increase local and international filings and registrations of industrial designs by enhancing the country’s legal framework, developing strategic partnerships and adopting international best practices.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
Gift this article