Philippines: accession to the Hague Agreement

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Philippines: accession to the Hague Agreement

Sponsored by

hechanova-400px.png
manila-1709394.jpg

Editha Hechanova of Hechanova Group outlines the potential benefits for Philippines’ design rights holders if the country follows through with its planned accession to the Hague Agreement

On August 29, 2023, the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL) conducted a public consultation regarding the planned accession to the WIPO Hague Agreement for the International Registration of Industrial Designs. The Hague Agreement, which has 96 member countries and 79 contracting parties, provides for an international mechanism called the Hague System to simultaneously secure and manage design rights in different jurisdictions.

At present, nationals or residents of the Philippines who wish to protect their design rights in markets of interest must file separate applications in their desired countries, which may have different translation requirements, fees, and procedures as provided by the Paris Convention, of which the Philippines is a signatory. Under the Hague System, the procedure is simplified since there is a single application, a choice of one language (likely English), one currency for fees (Swiss Francs), centralised management, and greater flexibility since the design rights holders can target national, regional or global markets.

Right now, in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) region the following countries have already joined the Hague Agreement: Brunei, Cambodia, Singapore and Vietnam. Embodied in the ASEAN IPR Action Plan for 2016-2025 is its strategic goal to accede to international treaties such as the Madrid Protocol, the Hague Agreement and the Patent Cooperation Treaty. In line with the ASEAN’s goal to transform itself into an “innovative and competitive region thru the use of intellectual property”, the Philippines thru the IPOPHL has drawn a roadmap for its accession to the Hague Agreement:

figure 1.png

The IPOPHL aims to increase local and international filings and registrations of industrial designs by enhancing the country’s legal framework, developing strategic partnerships and adopting international best practices.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brandsmiths and Powell Gilbert will contest claims over several UK trademarks in a High Court case examining the ownership and revival of a heritage brand
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is taking a fresh strategic approach to pricing in its AI strategy. It could amplify calls for law firms to ditch the billable hour
Charles Harding plans to build a new team around life sciences oppositions and contentious work, drawing on his three decades developing a practice from scratch at D Young & Co
The firm reveals how its litigation strategies informed the arguments that took Masimo’s judgment past $818 million
The firm was rebuilding its IP practice through a string of patent hires and a Texas expansion, but its dissolution has put the newly built talent back into the market
AI can exploit longstanding gaps in copyright protection at remarkable speed, but EU law still provides tools to fight back, says Simon Hembt at Bird & Bird
The firm has tapped a local patent trio to establish a foothold in the market and broaden its national presence
New Asia-Pacific IP head Jonathan Chu is eyeing opportunities arising from Chinese technology licensing, overseas enforcement and increasingly IP-heavy cross-border deals
Europe’s largest intellectual property convention and trade fair is back: IP Service World 2026 takes place in Munich from November 23–25 – the 16th edition, with 1,400-plus attendees from 55-plus nations, 100-plus speakers, and 100-plus exhibitors. Three days. Two focused areas. One IP marketplace.
Mehmet Gün and Uğur Aktekin discuss four decades of change in Türkiye’s legal market, the firm’s commitment to independence and the challenge of building an institution that can outlast its founders
Gift this article