The blocking of web pages due to stream ripping in Mexico
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement
Expert AnalysisLocal Insights

The blocking of web pages due to stream ripping in Mexico

Sponsored by


Moisés Castorena Katz of Olivares reports on a non-binding resolution that draws on the Mexican Supreme Court’s ruling that web pages can be blocked if they violate third-party copyright to a sufficient degree

On August 25 2023, a non-binding resolution issued by a Circuit Court in Mexico City correctly followed the criterion the Supreme Court used in its ruling on the famous Alestra case. The Supreme Court determined that the blocking of web pages is appropriate when they contain, in a major amount, infringing content of third parties’ copyrights.

The non-binding resolution maintains that in an amparo trial (comparable to the North American judicial review), a provisional suspension requested by internet providers against any orders to block internet pages, with the aim to avoid such blocking, must be denied when the page offers users, predominantly, services of ‘content ripping’ or ‘stream ripping’. Such services would be against public order provisions and would affect the social interest.

This legal criterion of the Circuit Court stems from the arguments applied by the Supreme Court when resolving the Alestra case. The dispute concerned the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property imposing a blocking order as a precautionary measure on a website using sound recordings through hyperlinks, without the authorisation of the corresponding rights holder.

The Circuit Court correctly qualified the concept of ‘totality’ – in terms of the amount of infringing content on the website – and interpreted that the refusal of the courts to grant provisional measures against the order to block a website is appropriate in cases in which the violations of third-party copyrights are carried out predominantly. This, in a personal opinion, is what the Supreme Court sought to convey through the arguments of the Alestra case sentence.

Although the non-binding resolution is not mandatory, it is indicative for future related cases.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Ahead of the first anniversary of the UPC, practitioners share how the court has kept them busy and look ahead to emerging trends
Three counsel who joined Boies Schiller explain why the firm will help them advise both plaintiffs and defendants
The Grand Board said the applied-for mark would ‘trivialise’ one of the deadliest pandemics in history
Tim Chen Saulsbury explains why single-craft artisans inspire him and how, even at home, he’s never too far from another IP lawyer
The firm also plans to build an entertainment practice group and up its IP and antitrust offerings with a focus on foreign clients
An intimate understanding of a client’s sector is essential to winning new business, a survey of over 28,000 corporate counsel reveals
Counsel say a Federal Circuit ruling on the obviousness test for design patents may increase the time IP owners spend defending their rights
With INTA Annual Meeting over for another year, here are a few things Managing IP learned after attending IP’s biggest party
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Four sources reveal which tools they have been using – or building – to help them with a range of tasks from invention generation to claim sufficiency
Gift this article