J&J faces price and patent probe over TB drug in South Africa
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

J&J faces price and patent probe over TB drug in South Africa

Aerial view of Capetown, SOuth Africa
Cape Town

The drugmaker is reportedly accused of excessive pricing for anti-TB drug bedaquiline and patent evergreening

South Africa’s Competition Commission will investigate Johnson & Johnson over excessive pricing for a tuberculosis drug and patent evergreening, local media reported yesterday, September 14.

The US drugmaker has faced heavy criticism this year over its pricing and patent strategies for bedaquiline, which is used to treat drug-resistant TB.

South African officials are said to be concerned that South Africa is paying twice as much for the drug as other low- and middle-income countries.

The Health Justice Initiative (HJI), a non-profit organisation, announced the probe after a briefing from government officials.

A spokesperson for the Competition Commission confirmed the news to local media and said it would issue a full statement soon.

Bedaquiline prices fell this summer after J&J agreed to license patents to the Stop TB Partnership’s Global Drug Facility.

The Stop TB Partnership is a UN-backed organisation aimed at improving access to TB treatment.

That deal came after access to medicine campaigners targeted J&J over its efforts to extend patent protection on bedaquiline, which is set to expire in most countries this year.

Last month, the Stop TB Partnership revealed that prices for the drug fell by up to 55% as a result of the J&J licence.

J&J now charges most lower-income countries a headline price of $130 for a six-month course of the drug compared to the old figure of $289.

But South Africa doesn’t appear to be benefiting from the slide in prices.

Under the Ministry of Health’s latest deal with J&J, concluded last month, South Africa will pay R5,500 ($288.62) for a six-month course.

Fatima Hassan, a prominent health lawyer and founder of the HJI, called the news “unprecedented and welcome”.

“It is time our country stands up to the bullying of multinational pharmaceutical corporations, in all its forms,” she said.

A spokesperson for J&J said: the company had a "longstanding commitment" to South Africa’s fight against multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB).

"Today, all patients in South Africa who require bedaquiline, our medicine for MDR-TB, have access to it thanks to our collaboration with the government of South Africa and other stakeholders, which has contributed to a steady decline in TB incidence.

"The company will cooperate fully with the Competition Commission in its inquiry, and cannot comment further while this is ongoing," the spokesperson said.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

High-earning businesses place most value on the depth of the external legal teams advising them, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Kilpatrick Townsend was recognised as Americas firm of the year, while patent powerhouse James Haley won a lifetime achievement award
Partners at Foley Hoag and Kilburn & Strode explore how US and UK courts have addressed questions of AI and inventorship
In-house lawyers have considerable influence over law firms’ actions, so they must use that power to push their external advisers to adopt sustainable practices
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Counsel say they’re advising clients to keep a close eye on confidentiality agreements after the FTC voted to ban non-competes
Data from Managing IP+’s Talent Tracker shows US firms making major swoops for IP teams, while South Korea has also been a buoyant market
The finalists for the 13th annual awards have been announced
Counsel reveal how a proposal to create separate briefings for discretionary denials at the USPTO could affect their PTAB strategies
The UK Supreme Court rejected the firm’s appeal against an earlier ruling because it did not raise an arguable point of law
Gift this article