Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Five minutes with ... Tamara Quinn, Osborne Clarke


Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer about their life and career

Welcome to the latest instalment of Managing IP’s ‘Five minutes with’ series, where we learn more about IP lawyers on a personal as well as a professional level. This time we have Tamara Quinn, partner at Osborne Clarke in London.

Someone asks you at a party what you do for a living. What do you say?

Usually, I say that I’m a lawyer and that I specialise in IP, data, and increasingly, artificial intelligence (AI). However, as a closet James Bond fan, I have been known to claim that I'm an international woman of mystery, with IP lawyer as my cover…

Talk us through a typical working day.

It varies quite a bit, depending on what sort of matters I'm working on. It typically starts on the tube [London Underground] – reading through emails and prioritising them – and continues at my desk. What happens next changes from day to day and is often unpredictable, but it’s mostly a mix of client and internal meetings either in person or over Teams. This typically includes working with colleagues on contracts and written advice. There will often be a smattering of business development work along the way, such as working on an article or planning a client webinar. I personally don't like working from home, so I'd rather stay late at the office and get something finished.

What are you working on at the moment?

As usual, there's quite a range. There's advice to a software provider on IP risks associated with the use of generative AI by its coding team; advising a publishing sector client on some complex issues around conflicting content licences; drafting a contract for IP ownership and licensing of a new work by a well-known artist; and acting for a defence client which is acquiring some pretty cutting-edge drone detection technology. I could go on!

Does one big piece of work usually take priority or are you juggling multiple things?

I generally have quite a few different projects on the go, at various stages of their life cycle, so there's always some juggling involved! When a big, urgent piece of work is in play, it will inevitably dominate for a while, but you have to be flexible, and ensure that all the other ongoing matters are dealt with too. We are fortunate to have a good-sized team here, so that we can spread the load when things get especially busy.

What is the most exciting aspect of your role and what is the most stressful?

I've always been fascinated by science and technology, so I love finding out about clients' businesses. One of the things that I love about being an IP lawyer is how varied our work is.

In terms of stress, one of the trickiest situations to handle is when you have to give clients advice that they desperately don't want to hear. Whilst the vast majority accept and deal with it, occasionally a client will try to persuade us to change our view. You have to be empathetic and helpful, but robust. That can be a difficult balance.

Tell us the key characteristics that make a successful IP lawyer.

That's a tricky question to give a straight answer to – IP lawyers are quite a varied bunch! As well as having excellent analytical skills, I think it's important to be curious-minded about the subject matter of your client's IP, and genuinely interested in IP law itself. After all, you're going to spend a whole working life immersed in it, so it needs to be something that you enjoy delving into.

What is the most common misconception about IP?

That it's all about patents, or all about copyright, or all about brands: non-lawyers will often be aware of one particular type of IP, and not realise that many of us practise across the whole spectrum of IP rights. And there's also a lack of understanding of non-contentious work, which is my area of focus. It often comes as a surprise to people that IP law isn't all about be-wigged barristers clashing in court and that acquiring, structuring, and licensing IP is the order of the day for most organisations.

What or who inspires you?

At the moment, it is the breathtaking implications of AI. I don't know whether it will be over two years, five years, or 10 years, but it is going to be truly transformative technology, in a way that we can barely imagine today.

If you weren’t an IP lawyer, what would you be doing?

Well, there's always that international woman of mystery gig I mentioned …

Any advice you would give your younger self?

Never stop trying to learn. Keep an open mind, be curious about your clients' businesses, be interested in your colleagues and how they approach things, and use all this information to continually grow and evolve.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Civil society and industry representatives met in Geneva on Thursday, September 28 to discuss a potential expansion of the TRIPS waiver
Sources say the beta version of the USPTO’s new trademark search tool is a big improvement over the current system but that it isn’t perfect
Canadian counsel weigh in on the IP office’s decision to raise trademark filing fees in 2024 and how they’re preparing clients
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Shira Perlmutter, US Register of Copyrights, discussed the Copyright Office's role in forming generative AI policy during a House of Representatives hearing
The award marks one of the highest-ever damages received by a foreign company in a trademark infringement suit in China
Two orders denying public access to documents have reignited a debate over a lack of transparency at the new court
Rouse’s new chief of operations and the firm’s CEO tell Managing IP why they think private equity backing will help it conquer Europe
Brian Landry, partner at Saul Ewing, reveals how applicants can prosecute patent applications in the wake of the Federal Circuit's In re Cellect ruling
Ronelle Geldenhuys of Australia’s Foundry IP considers the implications complex computer technologies such as AI have on decision-making