Amgen appeals over orphan drug biosimilar ban
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Amgen appeals over orphan drug biosimilar ban

Vials of liquid on a white table and the logo of a large pharmaceutical company.

Alexion obtained a preliminary injunction in Munich barring Amgen from selling a biosimilar version of its antibody drug

Amgen has appealed against a German court order issued last Friday, August 4, after having earlier been forced to pull a drug for a rare blood disorder from the German market.

Alexion, a UK-based biologics developer owned by AstraZeneca, asserted orphan drug exclusivity (ODE) rights on its antibody treatment Soliris (eculizumab) against Amgen at the Munich Regional Court earlier this year.

Soliris is approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to treat paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH), a chronic blood condition, as well as other rare diseases.

The EMA approved Bekemv, Amgen’s biosimilar version of Soliris, for the treatment of PNH in April this year, after Alexion’s monopoly on that use of the drug expired.

But in May, days after Bekemv launched in Germany, Alexion obtained a preliminary injunction at the Munich court that restricted Amgen’s sale of the drug.

Alexion claimed there was a risk that Bekemv would be used for the off-label treatment of conditions other than PNH, for which Alexion still has exclusive rights.

Soliris is protected by ODE until later this year for atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome, until 2027 for generalised myasthenia gravis, and until 2029 for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.

The Munich court upheld May’s preliminary order last Friday, August 4, after finding that Amgen had contributed to the risk of off-label use of Bekemv by sending letters of recommendation to medical practitioners.

A spokesperson for Alexion said: "We are pleased with the court’s decision in that it helps protect some of the incentives that propel innovation in the rare disease space.”

Counsel for Amgen said the case was the first time the holder of ODE rights had asserted them against a competitor in Europe.

The court ruled Amgen couldn’t market Bekemv unless it met certain conditions, which its lawyers have described as “unreasonable” and “unbearable”.

Amgen, represented by Osborne Clarke and Bardehle Pagenberg, has appealed against the decision to the Federal Court of Justice.

According to Tilman Müller-Stoy, partner at Bardehle Pagenberg, the injunction is based entirely on the mere danger of off-label use.

The court’s order would require Amgen customers, including hospitals, to contractually agree not to make any off-label use of the drug, Müller-Stoy said.

Alexion has also sued Samsung’s biosimilars unit, Samsung Bioepis, at the same court. A hearing over a preliminary injunction in that case is scheduled for August 16.

The EMA approved Samsung Bioepis’s biosimilar version of eculizumab in May.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

With a team of more than 80 patent lawyers and attorneys across 21 European offices, the firm is acting in some of the most high-profile UPC cases
Lippes Mathias has hired three partners and a counsel from Offit Kurman
External counsel for automotive companies explain how trends such as AI and vehicle connectivity are affecting their practices and reveal what their clients are prioritising
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The winners of the awards will be revealed at a gala dinner in New York City on April 25
Counsel debate the potential outcome of SCOTUS’s latest copyright case after justices questioned whether they should dismiss it
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer about their life and career
The small Düsseldorf firm is making a big impact in the UPC. Founding partner Christof Augenstein explains why
The court criticised Oppo’s attempts to delay proceedings and imposed a penalty, adding that the Chinese company may need to pay more if the trial isn’t concluded this year
Miguel Hernandez explains how he secured victory for baby care company Naterra in his first oral argument before the Federal Circuit
Gift this article