Five minutes with ... Mike Keyes, IP litigator at Dorsey & Whitney

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Five minutes with ... Mike Keyes, IP litigator at Dorsey & Whitney

JMK for YT.jpg

Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer about their life and career

Welcome to the latest instalment of Managing IP’s new series, ‘Five minutes with’, where we learn more about IP lawyers on a personal as well as a professional level. This time we have Mike Keyes, IP litigator at Dorsey & Whitney in Seattle.

Someone asks you at a party what you do for a living. What do you say?

I am a consumer survey consultant, as well as a trial lawyer, focused on trademark, copyright, and advertising litigation. Hopefully, they don’t run for the hills after hearing that!

Talk us through a typical working day.

I’m definitely an early riser. That’s when I get a lot of non-billable work completed and off my desk. I also do research and writing in those early hours depending on the day. I have a LinkedIn publication called Lanham Act Surveys for Lawyers where I discuss recent case law developments on the admissibility of survey research in trademark and advertising disputes. So, I try to focus on those sorts of things before the day starts.

Then, like everyone else, I’m off to the races. Zoom meetings, calls, remote hearings, new client and/or survey research inquiries—a varied symphony of tasks depending on the day. We have two kids in college and one on the cusp, so that new freedom means I’m pulled in fewer directions personally.

What are you working on at the moment?

I have a number of consumer survey research projects in the works. As for my trial practice, I am engrossed in a couple of trademark cases for some technology companies and another one for an architecture company. Really fun and interesting engagements!

Does one big piece of work usually take priority or are you juggling multiple things?

It really depends. Right now I am juggling multiple research projects along with several litigation matters. There are times, though, when one matter is all-consuming and basically requires full-time caring and feeding. At that point, you do the best you can to (somewhat) clear the decks, bring in others to assist on existing matters as needed, and get ready for a fun and busy ride.

What is the most exciting aspect of your role and what is the most stressful?

Hmm. Most exciting is definitely preparing for a big preliminary injunction hearing or trial. Those times also tend to be the most stressful as there is a lot on the line and a ton of time and resources have been invested by the client and the trial team.

Tell us the key characteristics that make a successful IP lawyer.

Staying curious. Staying current. Staying focused.

What is the most common misconception about IP?

That patents, copyrights, and trademarks are all synonymous or interchangeable. We see it all the time (even among well-informed journalists and other professionals) when someone mistakenly refers to getting a 'patent' on a name, 'trademarking' a book, or otherwise 'copyrighting' a slogan.

What or who inspires you?

There are so many, but my latest inspiration is the classical pianist Yuja Wang. Earlier this year she played all five Rachmaninoff piano concertos in a single concert at Carnegie Hall in New York City. It’s a feat that no other human being on the planet could accomplish as those pieces are so massive and difficult. So, if I ever get feeling like things are a bit hectic or difficult, I just remind myself that “this is no five Rachmaninoff concertos at Carnegie Hall!” Thanks, Yuja Wang!

If you weren’t an IP lawyer, what would you be doing?

I’d be a full-time consumer survey expert in trademark and advertising matters. I have a master’s degree in survey research and data analysis. I have always found consumer attitudes and beliefs to be a fascinating area of inquiry. Either that or I’d be a starving pianist, teaching somewhere, with summers off, and toiling away on a Rachmaninoff piano concerto!

Any advice you would give your younger self?

Don’t forget that patience is the best teacher, and time is the best critic.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

McDermott Will & Schulte lawyers explore why the UPC is seeing rapid adoption by medtech for fast-moving disputes, while pharma and biotech take a cautious, selective approach over revocation risks
IP firms may be growing more comfortable with external capital, but uncertainty over who could ultimately own the business is complicating the investment pitch
The former Western District of Texas judge addresses perceptions of his courtroom, reveals what comes next as he returns to practice at A&O Shearman and explains why marathon running is ‘cathartic’
International Anti-Counterfeiting Coalition says it has been blocked from hosting its annual event in the city, ending a long tradition of holding the gathering in the days leading up to INTA’s flagship event
The ITC is a powerful tool for litigators, practitioners say, as the threat of an exclusion order on a critical tech component could mean disrupting the entire data centre's operations
Anna Toh plans to expand Rajah & Tann’s soft IP capabilities, leveraging its Southeast Asia network to support clients on cross-border portfolio management and commercial strategy
The Canadian boutique’s new IP lead says he wants to build a tech-enabled IP practice aimed at giving startups senior expertise away from the traditional ‘big law’ set-up
Qantm IP’s acquisition of Henry Goh & Co shows shifting attitudes towards private equity, with firms increasingly viewing external backing as a normal route to expansion rather than a source of concern
The firm’s involvement in prominent AI cases drew litigator Christian Mammen to join from Womble Bond Dickinson, as US firms continue to bolster AI-focused practices
Two judicial appointments confirmed in Paris and Mannheim, while cross-border injunctions and high-profile procedural rulings keep major patent practices occupied
Gift this article