Allen & Overy to merge with US firm Shearman & Sterling

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Allen & Overy to merge with US firm Shearman & Sterling

Allen & Overy

The combined firm would have 3,900 lawyers and 800 partners across 49 offices

UK-headquartered Allen & Overy is to merge with US-based Shearman & Sterling, the firms jointly announced yesterday, May 21.

In a statement, the firms said the proposed merger would create a new global leader named Allen Overy Shearman Sterling, or A&O Shearman for short. The combined firm would have 3,900 lawyers and 800 partners across 49 offices.

According to the firms, it would be the only global firm that offered US, UK and local law capabilities in equal measure.

The planned merger comes at an intriguing time for both firms. In March, Shearman & Sterling abandoned talks over a tie-up with Hogan Lovells, while A&O previously pursued a merger with another US firm, O'Melveny & Myers.

A&O senior partner Wim Dejonghe said in a statement that the firm had long admired Shearman & Sterling’s work and outstanding legal talent.

“I have been so pleased by the striking cultural similarities between us and Shearman & Sterling. We are expecting this cultural fit to ease the path to integration and that our clients will be reassured by the familiarity in the quality and tone of the counsel they seek.”

Adam Hakki, senior partner at Shearman & Sterling, said: “Client need for global elite firms has never been greater. They are calling for integrated global legal solutions and advice: merging with A&O will dramatically accelerate our ability to meet their needs in an increasingly complex environment.”

The plans are subject to an approvals process, which includes a partner vote on both sides.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A decision by the Paris Central Division will lead to more IP work for outside counsel, say sources
Courts are encouraged to deliver judgments within three months of a trial, but that deadline has been missed in several recent cases
Lawyers at Maiwald and Sterne Kessler analyse how patents with claims directed to medical treatments are handled in the US and in Europe
Michael DeVincenzo explains how he and his team convinced the Federal Circuit to find in favour of his client in a patent case against Salesforce
Funders and a litigator explain how litigation funding disclosure requirements could affect their business
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Discussions about whether to seek director reviews can come up frequently with clients, even though actual grant rates are rare
In the latest episode, we discuss why IP firms might be attractive to PE investors and bring you the latest news on submissions for next year’s IP STARS rankings
Back-to-back PE deals for IP firms in recent years show that IP firms are sitting on goldmines, so traditional partnerships should be open to change
Joseph Maraia, whose team left Burns & Levinson shortly before it closed, says ArentFox Schiff is looking at the right opportunities
Gift this article