Webinar: Hybrid IP portfolio management: maximise efficiency/minimise costs

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Webinar: Hybrid IP portfolio management: maximise efficiency/minimise costs

Sponsored by

Zacco_360 IP_RGB.jpg
MIP article page@4x.png

Join MIP and Zacco at 2pm BST (3pm CEST) on Thursday June 15 as they explore some of the reasons why companies are increasingly adopting a hybrid IP portfolio management model, both as a means to improve quality and in response to an increasingly uncertain economic outlook

Register here for MIP and Zacco’s webinar on how organisations can improve the quality, efficiency and reach of their IP portfolio, often reducing management costs and without compromising on the integrity or protection of their IP rights.

IP rights form an integral part of an organisation’s ability to operate domestically and to enter new markets. Whether it is the value of patents, and being able to sell a product or provide a service that cannot be matched by others, or the value represented by an established brand that can be protected by trademarks, IP rights continue to be the lifeblood of industry and services and can be a key differentiator during times of economic uncertainty.

Why could growth become a problem?

As the size of an IP portfolio grows, it becomes significantly more time consuming and expensive to maintain, particularly when it crosses international borders. Costs accumulate further when your in-house team are spending their time on administrative tasks, and the maintenance of existing rights, when it could be put to better use focusing on the development and protection of new ideas and innovations.

Alternatively, the cost of losing rights through failure to maintain them could be catastrophic, so it becomes a question of balance. Finding the right combination of maintenance and development can be a tough exercise in prioritisation, so what options are available to companies looking to grow their IP portfolio without risking their current rights?

How can growth be prioritised without impacting performance?

An increasing number of companies are finding value in adopting a hybrid IP portfolio management model. This differs from a fully outsourced portfolio management model in that the services offered are fitted to suit the individual needs of each IP portfolio, but this means that choosing the right services, and the right partner, are integral to success.

Such a model can effectively remove the need for in-house resources to perform some of the more time-consuming tasks, such as renewals, validation or invoice management. Depending on your IP partner, some providers are also able to ‘insource’ a paralegal or attorney who can assist during times of high workload.

The types of services available can be designed to suit any budget and any portfolio size. A good IP service provider will be able to provide relevant expertise, improve the integrity and the security of your IP rights, and reduce the need for up-to-the-minute knowledge of changing legislation across global markets. The right partner will improve the quality of your portfolio and can often be a more cost-effective solution than maintaining the same level of expertise in-house, but what does the right partner look like? That depends on the needs of your portfolio.

What areas should be prioritised when considering a potential IP services partner?

  • Deciding which services should be managed in-house or externally;

  • Identifying which parts of the portfolio or which markets could be handled by a partner;

  • Why choosing the right partner can actually improve the quality of your portfolio;

  • Calculating pricing models based on service delivery;

  • How to assess a provider’s quality assurance, data security and transparency;

  • Assessing an IP partner’s expertise and local regulatory knowledge in key markets; and

  • The benefits and pitfalls of manual versus automated processes.

Zacco’s Karin Kärvling Søholt, director of strategic alliances, Betina Hellemann, director of IP services and quality, and Agatha Bergman, relationship manager, will explain how your business could benefit from a new approach to IP management and offer some insight into what questions you should be asking at the first stage of any IP service partnering discussions. Join us for the webinar on Thursday, June 15 at 2pm BST (3pm CEST, 9am EDT, 5pm GST or 6.30pm IST).

Register here.

Zacco

Zacco, part of OpSec, is a true European full-service IP firm with a 360-degree approach to intellectual property. Zacco has the expertise, knowledge and insight to assist with the development, maintenance and enforcement of IP rights across all current and emerging fields of technology, as well as physical or digital branding, e-commerce, IP transactions, and IP due diligence.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

News of Dolby suing Snap over AV1 and HEVC patents and SCOTUS offering guidance on the liability of internet service providers were also among the top talking points
Arrival of Caitlin Heard will bolster the soon-to-be-created Ashurst Perkins Coie’s IP presence in the capital
AI, cybersecurity and data practice group will provide clients with legal guidance around AI alongside a 'deep technical foundation’ in IP
Lawyers at Vondst and Biopatents say a ruling concerning the protected status of trade secrets could see the UPC flooded with requests to prevent access to confidential information
Sharad Vadehra of Kan & Krishme discusses why older IP firms still have an edge over up-and-coming boutiques and how the firm is using AI to provide quick and cost-effective service
Lawyers at Appleyard Lees share how they picked apart a plant breeder’s infringement claims concerning the ‘Tango’ mandarin
A further decision on long-arm status, and a new hire for Pentarc in Germany from Taylor Wessing were also among top developments
The US decision marks a rare grant of a request under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act in a patent case
Stobbs has applied to strike out a contempt of court application filed against the firm and two of its lawyers
With trademark volumes surging, trademark teams need to think beyond traditional clearance searches, towards a continuous, intelligence-led workflow, says Meghan Medeiros of Corsearch
Gift this article