US lawmakers blast patent thickets in letter to USPTO director

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US lawmakers blast patent thickets in letter to USPTO director

retro banner with red vintage typewriter with a blank sheet of p

Three Republican and two Democratic Congress members have claimed that patent thickets hinder access to affordable medicine

Members from both sides of the US House of Representatives wrote to USPTO director Kathi Vidal on Friday, March 24, expressing their concern about “patent thicketing.”

Five members – three Republicans and two Democrats – urged Vidal to consider implementing the proposed policies outlined in her October 4 2022 request for comment.

Vidal’s suggested that parties seeking to overcome rejections based on obvious variations of prior claims should stipulate that those claims aren’t patentably distinct.

Such admission would ensure that if one of the duplicates was invalidated, courts could consider that fact as evidence against the others, the members claimed.

“Branded manufacturers will often seek numerous patents on a single feature of a drug, creating a dense web, or thicket, of patents that delay generic and biosimilar competition,” the letter said.

“While some may question the quality of these patents, the high cost, uncertainty, and lengthy process for challenging them, makes it practically impossible to sort the good from the bad.”

The letter added that patent thickets, the process of seeking multiple patents on a single feature of drug, protected older drugs from competition, which costs the US government and taxpayers more money and hinders patients’ options for cost-effective treatment.

The signees were Republican Jodey Arrington, Michael Burgess and Darrell Issa, and Democrats Lloyd Doggett and Annie Kuster.

Vidal’s October 2022 request for comment came about after President Joe Biden issued an executive order to promote access to drugs in 2021 and after six senators raised concerns about patent thickets in a June 2022 letter to the USPTO.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Jeremy Hertzog explains how his team worked through a huge amount of disclosure from Adidas and what victory means for the firm
Evarist Kameja and Hadija Juma at Bowmans explain why a new law in Tanzania marks a significant shift in IP enforcement
In the wake of controversy surrounding Banksy’s recent London mural, AJ Park’s Thomas Huthwaite and Eloise Calder delve into the challenges street artists face in protecting their works and rights
Alex Levkin, founder of iPNOTE, discusses reshaping the filing industry through legal tech, and why practitioners’ advice should stretch beyond immediate legal needs
Cohausz & Florack, together with Krieger Mes & Graf von der Groeben, have taken action against Amazon on behalf of three VIA LA licensors
In the fourth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss unconscious bias in the IP workplace and how to address it
Greg Munt, who has moved from Griffith Hack to James & Wells after four decades, hails his new firm’s approach to client service
Practitioners warn that closing the Denver regional office could trigger a domino effect, threatening local innovation and access to IP resources
Law firms are rethinking litigation strategies after USPTO director John Squires said he would take control of PTAB challenges
News of Singapore planning to streamline the licensing framework for foreign law firms and a partnership between Avanci and Xprize were also among the top talking points
Gift this article