US lawmakers blast patent thickets in letter to USPTO director

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US lawmakers blast patent thickets in letter to USPTO director

retro banner with red vintage typewriter with a blank sheet of p

Three Republican and two Democratic Congress members have claimed that patent thickets hinder access to affordable medicine

Members from both sides of the US House of Representatives wrote to USPTO director Kathi Vidal on Friday, March 24, expressing their concern about “patent thicketing.”

Five members – three Republicans and two Democrats – urged Vidal to consider implementing the proposed policies outlined in her October 4 2022 request for comment.

Vidal’s suggested that parties seeking to overcome rejections based on obvious variations of prior claims should stipulate that those claims aren’t patentably distinct.

Such admission would ensure that if one of the duplicates was invalidated, courts could consider that fact as evidence against the others, the members claimed.

“Branded manufacturers will often seek numerous patents on a single feature of a drug, creating a dense web, or thicket, of patents that delay generic and biosimilar competition,” the letter said.

“While some may question the quality of these patents, the high cost, uncertainty, and lengthy process for challenging them, makes it practically impossible to sort the good from the bad.”

The letter added that patent thickets, the process of seeking multiple patents on a single feature of drug, protected older drugs from competition, which costs the US government and taxpayers more money and hinders patients’ options for cost-effective treatment.

The signees were Republican Jodey Arrington, Michael Burgess and Darrell Issa, and Democrats Lloyd Doggett and Annie Kuster.

Vidal’s October 2022 request for comment came about after President Joe Biden issued an executive order to promote access to drugs in 2021 and after six senators raised concerns about patent thickets in a June 2022 letter to the USPTO.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

As global commerce continues to expand through e-commerce platforms and digital marketplaces, protecting brands has become a growing challenge for organisations worldwide. Counterfeiting, intellectual property infringement, and online brand abuse are increasing across industries, making brand protection strategies a critical priority for businesses.
Henrik Holzapfel and Chuck Larsen of McDermott Will & Schulte explain why a Court of Appeal ruling could promote access to justice and present a growth opportunity for litigation finance
A co-partner in charge says the UK prosecution teams are a ‘vital’ part of the firm’s offering, while praising a key injunction win
A team from White & Case has checked in on behalf of Premier Inn Hotels in a UK trademark and passing off case against a cookie brand
Litigation team says pre-trial work and a Section 101 defence helped significantly limit damages payable by ride-sharing firm Lyft in patent case
News of Avanci hiring a senior vice president and the EPO teaming up with a French AI startup were also among the top talking points
Explosm, the independent Texas studio behind the hit webcomic Cyanide & Happiness, partnered with Temu’s IP protection team to combat counterfeiters infringing on its brand
The latest in a dispute over juicing machines, and a shakeup in judicial compositions were also among the top developments
Patent partner Robert Hollingshead explains why the firm remains committed to Japan despite several US firms exiting the Japanese and greater Asia market
Emma Green, partner at Bird & Bird, shares why the Iceland v Iceland dispute could prompt businesses and lawyers to think differently about brand enforcement
Gift this article