US lawmakers blast patent thickets in letter to USPTO director

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US lawmakers blast patent thickets in letter to USPTO director

retro banner with red vintage typewriter with a blank sheet of p

Three Republican and two Democratic Congress members have claimed that patent thickets hinder access to affordable medicine

Members from both sides of the US House of Representatives wrote to USPTO director Kathi Vidal on Friday, March 24, expressing their concern about “patent thicketing.”

Five members – three Republicans and two Democrats – urged Vidal to consider implementing the proposed policies outlined in her October 4 2022 request for comment.

Vidal’s suggested that parties seeking to overcome rejections based on obvious variations of prior claims should stipulate that those claims aren’t patentably distinct.

Such admission would ensure that if one of the duplicates was invalidated, courts could consider that fact as evidence against the others, the members claimed.

“Branded manufacturers will often seek numerous patents on a single feature of a drug, creating a dense web, or thicket, of patents that delay generic and biosimilar competition,” the letter said.

“While some may question the quality of these patents, the high cost, uncertainty, and lengthy process for challenging them, makes it practically impossible to sort the good from the bad.”

The letter added that patent thickets, the process of seeking multiple patents on a single feature of drug, protected older drugs from competition, which costs the US government and taxpayers more money and hinders patients’ options for cost-effective treatment.

The signees were Republican Jodey Arrington, Michael Burgess and Darrell Issa, and Democrats Lloyd Doggett and Annie Kuster.

Vidal’s October 2022 request for comment came about after President Joe Biden issued an executive order to promote access to drugs in 2021 and after six senators raised concerns about patent thickets in a June 2022 letter to the USPTO.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Apple’s lawsuit against OpenAI, which features Tier 1-ranked disputes firms on both sides, reflects how trade secrets litigation is becoming a prominent competition feature
Drew & Napier’s leadership appointments show one way full-service firms can back up claims about the strategic importance of IP
Strike-out application will hear claims that the copyright aspect of an IP infringement claim brought by a gambling and sports betting group should be dropped
Amongst a sea of mergers, Lathrop GPM and HG Law have set out plans to combine, positioning themselves to compete with both IP boutiques and full-service firms
Patrícia Paias explains why she loves the science and business behind an idea and why potential rights owners must avoid the ‘file and forget’ philosophy
Lawyers eagerly await news of what IP specialist Sir Colin Birss will bring to one of the England and Wales judiciary’s most important roles
María Aurora García of Berken IP explains how intellectual property rights holders can use customs monitoring and online enforcement tools to identify parallel imports and support compliance with consumer protection rules
The Jakarta-based firm says personal networks and a distinctive strategy can help it guide foreign clients through what can be a tricky IP landscape
Munich litigation boutique formed by former Taylor Wessing partners continues expansion as it seeks to cement its position in the UPC market
Yvonne Tang and Siau Wen Lim, the second and third IP specialists to sit on the firm’s management committee, say IP is ‘uniquely positioned’ to support cross-practice work
Gift this article