US lawmakers blast patent thickets in letter to USPTO director

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

US lawmakers blast patent thickets in letter to USPTO director

retro banner with red vintage typewriter with a blank sheet of p

Three Republican and two Democratic Congress members have claimed that patent thickets hinder access to affordable medicine

Members from both sides of the US House of Representatives wrote to USPTO director Kathi Vidal on Friday, March 24, expressing their concern about “patent thicketing.”

Five members – three Republicans and two Democrats – urged Vidal to consider implementing the proposed policies outlined in her October 4 2022 request for comment.

Vidal’s suggested that parties seeking to overcome rejections based on obvious variations of prior claims should stipulate that those claims aren’t patentably distinct.

Such admission would ensure that if one of the duplicates was invalidated, courts could consider that fact as evidence against the others, the members claimed.

“Branded manufacturers will often seek numerous patents on a single feature of a drug, creating a dense web, or thicket, of patents that delay generic and biosimilar competition,” the letter said.

“While some may question the quality of these patents, the high cost, uncertainty, and lengthy process for challenging them, makes it practically impossible to sort the good from the bad.”

The letter added that patent thickets, the process of seeking multiple patents on a single feature of drug, protected older drugs from competition, which costs the US government and taxpayers more money and hinders patients’ options for cost-effective treatment.

The signees were Republican Jodey Arrington, Michael Burgess and Darrell Issa, and Democrats Lloyd Doggett and Annie Kuster.

Vidal’s October 2022 request for comment came about after President Joe Biden issued an executive order to promote access to drugs in 2021 and after six senators raised concerns about patent thickets in a June 2022 letter to the USPTO.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Peter Ling of Lenz & Staehelin in Zurich discusses trends in patent litigation, the regulation of AI and the benefits of teaching IP
Brandsmiths and Powell Gilbert will contest claims over several UK trademarks in a High Court case examining the ownership and revival of a heritage brand
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is taking a fresh strategic approach to pricing in its AI strategy. It could amplify calls for law firms to ditch the billable hour
Charles Harding plans to build a new team around life sciences oppositions and contentious work, drawing on his three decades developing a practice from scratch at D Young & Co
Gift this article