Mitsubishi Tanabe lands '$940m' revenue boost after Novartis win

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mitsubishi Tanabe lands '$940m' revenue boost after Novartis win

NovartisCOVER.jpg
Credit: Taljat / Adobe Stock

Paul Hastings led Mitsubishi Tanabe to victory over Novartis at the International Chamber of Commerce

Japanese pharma company Mitsubishi Tanabe has secured an arbitration victory against Novartis at the International Chamber of Commerce, a case related to blockbuster multiple sclerosis drug Gilenya (fingolimod).

According to Mitsubishi Tanabe, a subsidiary of Mitsubishi Chemical Group, the award will see its revenue increase by around $940 million.

The tribunal, which issued the decision on Monday, February 13, denied Novartis’s claims that provisions of a licence controlling royalties that it had to pay to Mitsubishi Tanabe in the US, EU and other jurisdictions were invalid.

Although Mitsubishi had received royalties from Novartis’s Gilenya, which used the Japanese company's patent rights and know-how, it hadn’t recognised those royalties as revenue. This was due to International Financial Reporting Standards 15, which sets out how to report information about revenue and cash flows from contracts with customers.

However, as a result of the ICC's decision, Mitsubishi can now recognise these royalties as revenue.

In a filing with Japan’s Financial Accounting Standards Foundation on Thursday, February 16, Mitsubishi said it was revising its revenue forecast for this quarter by ¥126 billion ($938.4 million) in light of the arbitration win.

The filing said: “The royalties which have not been recognised as revenue … during the arbitration proceedings will all be recognised as revenue in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ending March 31 2023.”

Mitsubishi also received ¥3 billion in arbitration-related costs from Novartis.

The Swiss pharma company had filed an application for an arbitration against Mitsubishi Tanabe in 2019.

Paul Hastings advised Mitsubishi Tanabe.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Drew & Napier’s leadership appointments show one way full-service firms can back up claims about the strategic importance of IP
Strike-out application will hear claims that the copyright aspect of an IP infringement claim brought by a gambling and sports betting group should be dropped
Amongst a sea of mergers, Lathrop GPM and HG Law have set out plans to combine, positioning themselves to compete with both IP boutiques and full-service firms
Patrícia Paias explains why she loves the science and business behind an idea and why potential rights owners must avoid the ‘file and forget’ philosophy
Lawyers eagerly await news of what IP specialist Sir Colin Birss will bring to one of the England and Wales judiciary’s most important roles
María Aurora García of Berken IP explains how intellectual property rights holders can use customs monitoring and online enforcement tools to identify parallel imports and support compliance with consumer protection rules
The Jakarta-based firm says personal networks and a distinctive strategy can help it guide foreign clients through what can be a tricky IP landscape
Munich litigation boutique formed by former Taylor Wessing partners continues expansion as it seeks to cement its position in the UPC market
Yvonne Tang and Siau Wen Lim, the second and third IP specialists to sit on the firm’s management committee, say IP is ‘uniquely positioned’ to support cross-practice work
As competing firms come under common ownership, clients may care less about formal conflicts and more about how openly firms discuss them
Gift this article