Keeping up with amendments to trademark rules in the Philippines

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Keeping up with amendments to trademark rules in the Philippines

Sponsored by

hechanova-400px.png
law-and-order-resized.jpg

Editha Hechanova of Hechanova Group overviews the Philippines’ recent overhaul of its trademark regulations, with significant repercussions for foreign applicants

The Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines recently amended the 2017 Rules and Regulations on trademarks, taking effect on February 1 2023. There were many procedural amendments affecting the requirements for filing trademark applications, but amendments which may create an additional burden for foreign applicants are as follows:

Composition of filing fees

 The filing fees shall consist of:

  • A basic fee;

  • A colour claim fee (if applicable); and

  • A publication for opposition fee.

The filing fee also includes the following, if applicable, and may be paid in advance: 

  • A convention priority claim fee;

  • A priority examination fee; and

  • An issuance and second publication fee.

The filing fee shall be deemed forfeited in favour of the government should the application not proceed to registration for whatever cause (Rule 501).

Submission of additional evidence during examination

If, during the examination of the application, the examiner finds actual basis to reasonably doubt the veracity of any aspect of the application, the examiner may require the applicant to submit sufficient evidence to remove doubt. This evidence may be in the form of a sworn statement of ownership and/or affidavit of good faith, among others (Rule 603).

Republication of mark amended by settlement or compromise agreement

In instances when the mark is the subject of a settlement and/or compromise agreement, and there was an amendment to the mark, its description, and/or specification, the amended mark may be republished for the public’s information (Rule 704).

Access to files by the public

Once the application has been published, access to files, including declaration of actual use and submitted proofs of use, may be made available to the public upon request and payment of the prescribed fees (Rule 702).

Assignment/transfer documents executed outside the Philippines

Assignment or transfer documents executed outside the Philippines must be authenticated by the Philippine Consulate Office at the place of execution. The past practice only required notarisation (Rule 1101).

Translation of documents executed outside the Philippines

The original copy of the document or assignment and its verified translation into English, if executed and notarised abroad, must be authenticated by the Philippine Consulate Office nearest the place of execution (Rule 1103).

Licence agreements must have quality control provision

A trademark licence agreement requires the licensor to ensure the quality control of the goods or services for which the mark is used. If the license contract does not provide for such quality control, or if such quality control is not effectively carried out, the licence contract shall be invalid. A licence contract shall have no effect on third parties until such quality control is ensured (Rule 1107).

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Erise IP has added a seven-practitioner trademark team from Hovey Williams, signalling its intention to help clients at all stages of development
News of prison sentences for ex-Samsung executives for trade secrets violation and an opposition filed by Taylor Swift were also among the top talking points
A multijurisdictional claim filed by InterDigital and a new spin-off firm in Germany were also among the top talking points
Duarte Lima, MD of Spruson & Ferguson’s Asia practice, says practitioners must adapt to process changes within IP systems, as well as be mindful of the implications of tech on their practices
Practitioners say the UK Supreme Court’s decision could boost the attractiveness of the UK for AI companies
New awards, including US ‘Firm of the Year’ and Latin America ‘Firm to Watch’, are among more than 90 prizes that will recognise firms and practitioners
DWF helped client Dairy UK secure a major victory at the UK Supreme Court
Hepworth Browne led Emotional Perception AI to victory at the UK Supreme Court, which rejected a previous appellate decision that said an AI network was not patentable
James Hill, general counsel at Norwich City FC, reveals how he balances fan engagement with brand enforcement, and when he calls on IP firms for advice
In the second of a two-part article, Gabrielle Faure-André and Stéphanie Garçon at Santarelli unpick EPO, UPC and French case law to assess the importance of clinical development timelines in inventive step analyses
Gift this article