Sandoz joins Accord in targeting US university
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Sandoz joins Accord in targeting US university

Viersen, Germany - May 9. 2020: Close up of mobile phone screen

The claim, filed this week against the University of California’s governing board, follows action by Accord Healthcare in October

Sandoz has become the second pharmaceutical company in the last few months to take action against the governing board of the University of California, according to a case filed with the England and Wales High Court on Tuesday, January 24.

The generics arm of Swiss outfit Novartis has filed pleadings against The Regents of the University of California. Publicly available documents are expected to be released in early February.

Sandoz filed the case in the patents division of the England and Wales High Court, but no further details are available at this stage.

The case follows action taken by Accord Healthcare in October last year in which the pharma company sought to invalidate a European patent and supplementary protection certificate (SPC) owned by the Regents.

That dispute arose after Accord signalled its intention to produce a capsule form of enzalutamide, a treatment for prostate cancer, in 2024 following the expiry of market exclusivity.

In the Accord case, the Regents first claimed that launching a capsule before the expiry date of a patent (EP 1,893,196) and SPC (GB13/079) it owns would amount to infringement.

In a counterclaim, Accord sought an order that the patent, called ‘diarylhydantoin compound’, is invalid and that the SPC is also invalid and should not come into force.

That case is expected to go to trial in the coming months. It is not known at this stage if the Sandoz dispute surrounds the same claims.

Bristows is representing Sandoz, whereas the Regents’ counsel have not been announced yet. In the Accord case, Pinsent Masons is acting for Accord while the Regents is being represented by Kirkland & Ellis.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers reveal how they inform clients about the IP implications of fast-moving private equity deals
View the Social Impact EMEA Awards 2024 shortlist and join us on September 12 at The Waldorf Hotel in London
James Tumbridge talks about advising the government on AI and why his day could start with the police and end with legal networking
Data from Managing IP+’s Talent Tracker shows that the IP ambitions of Asian full-service firms and a life sciences focus in the US have prompted lateral moves
Michelle Lue-Reid has joined the IP business as its chief transformation officer and will look to implement major change initiatives across member firms
Chad Landmon, who joins in Washington DC, hopes to expand the firm’s Hatch-Waxman practice
The FRAND rate is only 5 cents higher than the per-device rate determined at first instance in 2023
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Nearly four months after joining Crowell & Moring, Edward Taelman reflects on starting afresh, new clients, and firm culture
Firms discuss the ebb and flow of life sciences IP work and explain how they help professionals pivot between specialities
Gift this article