The top two issues in designating Mexico under the Hague system
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement
Expert AnalysisLocal Insights

The top two issues in designating Mexico under the Hague system

Sponsored by

olivares-400px.jpg
flag resized-815077.jpg

Jorge Juárez of Olivares explains the requirements for applicants aiming to protect industrial designs in designating Mexico and highlights the importance of compliance with the unity of design requirement

Since Mexico joined the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Designs in 2020, applicants have been able to designate Mexico to seek protection of their industrial designs. 

This article summarises two important issues that must be considered when designating Mexico.

Recognition of the priority

When an international application claims a priority, Mexican law provides that the certified copy of the priority must be submitted before the Mexican Patent Office (IMPI) within three months after the publication of the registration in the International Designs Bulletin.

The priority must be translated, unless it is in Spanish, and the corresponding payment for the priority claim must also be submitted within three months. 

Even though IMPI participates in the WIPO Digital Access Service and has access to the platform to obtain certified copies of priorities, applicants still need to submit the translation and payment within said term. Otherwise, IMPI will not recognise the priority in Mexico.

Unity of design requirement

Under Mexican law, designs that can be identified with the same denomination, share the same new characteristics, and produce the same general impression are considered as having unity of design. 

The Hague system indicates it is possible to include up to 100 designs belonging to the same Locarno classification in a single application. 

However, when an international application does not comply with the unity of design requirement, IMPI will issue a notification of refusal requiring the division of the application to elect a single design or designs having unity, whereas non-elected designs can be protected by means of divisional applications which must be submitted directly before IMPI.

Summary

The above considerations should be kept in mind when using the Hague system to ensure that designs are properly protected in Mexico.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The firm was among multiple winners at a record-breaking 2024 ceremony held in London on April 11
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The Americas research cycle has commenced. Do not miss this opportunity to nominate your work!
Increased and new patent fees could affect prosecution strategies for law firms and companies, according to sources
Five former Oblon lawyers felt that joining Merchant & Gould would help them offer the right prices to entice clients
The UK may not be a UPC member but its firms are still acting in proceedings, with Carpmaels among the most prominent
Naomi Pearce of Pearce IP shares how she is helping her firm become a life sciences leader and how generous policies have helped attract top talent
The Court of Appeal has dismissed an appeal filed by Ocado, in what was a key test for transparency at the new court
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer or professional about their life and career
INTA is calling out ‘immoral’ unregistered attendees at the association’s annual meeting, but the debate is more nuanced
Gift this article