Getty targets AI image generator in landmark copyright suit

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Getty targets AI image generator in landmark copyright suit

AdobeStock_433925015_Editorial_Use_Only (1).jpeg

The case is one of the first copyright disputes over AI-powered image generators and the data used to train them

Getty Images is suing the company behind the artificial intelligence-powered image generator Stable Diffusion for copyright infringement, it was confirmed today, January 17.

A notice of action was filed at the England and Wales High Court yesterday by law firm Fieldfisher on behalf of Getty.

In a statement published today, Getty said Stability AI, the creator of Stable Diffusion, unlawfully copied millions of copyright-protected images and the associated metadata.

Getty said it was willing to provide licences to its images for AI training purposes, but that Stability AI had so far ignored viable licensing options out of its own commercial interest.

The case is one of the first copyright lawsuits over AI-generated images.

On January 13, three artists filed a separate class action suit against a group of AI image developers, including Stability AI at the District Court for the Northern District of California for their alleged misuse of copyright-protected images.

The programs that develop these images rely on training data pulled from the internet.

An analysis of 12 million images used to train Stable Diffusion found that 15,000 came from Getty Images.

A Stability AI spokesperson said: "Please know that we take these matters seriously.

"It is unusual that we have been informed about this intended legal action via the press. We are still awaiting the service of any documents. Should we receive them, we will comment appropriately.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A new transatlantic firm under the name of Winston Taylor is expected to go live in May 2026, and is likely to have a significant impact on Europe’s IP market
Geoff Steward and Rebecca Newman of Addleshaw Goddard explain how they secured victory in a rare ‘genericide’ case and why the work went beyond the courtroom
Nancy Frandsen looks back on her career, from answering a paralegal advert to expanding RCCB’s ‘entrepreneurial’ IP practice as a partner
The tie-up could result in the firm’s German and France-based teams, which both have strong UPC expertise, becoming independent
News of a slowdown in the UK’s clean energy IP landscape and an EPO report on unitary patent uptake were also among the top talking points
Price hikes at ‘big law’ firms are pushing some clients toward boutiques that offer predictable fees, specialised expertise, and a model built around prioritising IP
The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Gift this article