CJEU: Amazon open to liability over fake Christian Louboutin ads
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

CJEU: Amazon open to liability over fake Christian Louboutin ads


Consumers could be misled into thinking counterfeit shoes were sold by Amazon itself, the court ruled yesterday

Amazon can be held liable over adverts for counterfeit Christian Louboutin shoes sold by third parties on the platform, the Court of Justice of the EU ruled yesterday, December 22.

The decision is a major boost to the French shoemaker in its trademark lawsuits against Amazon in Belgium and Luxembourg.

Louboutin claimed that Amazon infringed its rights by displaying adverts for counterfeit shoes, which copied its trademarked red sole.

The CJEU found yesterday that such adverts could give users the impression that the counterfeit shoes were sold by Amazon itself.

The Luxembourg District Court and Brussels Companies Court had made referrals to the CJEU over the issue.

Both courts can now resume proceedings to determine whether there was any confusion as a result of the adverts and if Amazon should be held liable.

An Amazon spokesperson said: “We will study the court’s decision. Amazon makes it clear to customers who they are buying from when they are shopping in our stores by displaying seller information.”

Alexis Mourot, CEO at Christian Louboutin, said the decision was a victory for all brands defending their intellectual property.

“We have always been committed to protecting our creativity, our uniqueness, and to preserving the relationship of trust with our customers,” Mourot added.

Xavier Ragot, general counsel at Christian Louboutin, added that the decision was a victory in the fight against counterfeiting and would benefit all consumers looking for authentic goods.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The Delhi High Court has expressed its willingness to set global licensing terms in the Nokia-Oppo dispute, but it must deal with longstanding problems first
Some patent counsel are still encountering errors even though the USPTO has fully transitioned to the new system
A senior USPTO attorney spoke at a Nokia-sponsored event on the EU’s proposed SEP Regulation today, November 29
IP counsel are ‘flooded’ with queries from clients worried about deepfakes, but the law has so far come up short
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career
Mathys & Squire has filed a test case that the firm hopes will make UPC pleadings available by default
Multiple representatives and their teams can now work on cases using the online CMS, but not everyone can submit documents
James Lawrence, partner at Addisons, explains how he convinced the full Federal Court of Australia to back his client in a patent dispute concerning mining safety equipment
The deal will allow the companies to use each other’s patents covering 4G and 5G technologies, and other cellular SEPs
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP