CJEU: Amazon open to liability over fake Christian Louboutin ads

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

CJEU: Amazon open to liability over fake Christian Louboutin ads

Amazon

Consumers could be misled into thinking counterfeit shoes were sold by Amazon itself, the court ruled yesterday

Amazon can be held liable over adverts for counterfeit Christian Louboutin shoes sold by third parties on the platform, the Court of Justice of the EU ruled yesterday, December 22.

The decision is a major boost to the French shoemaker in its trademark lawsuits against Amazon in Belgium and Luxembourg.

Louboutin claimed that Amazon infringed its rights by displaying adverts for counterfeit shoes, which copied its trademarked red sole.

The CJEU found yesterday that such adverts could give users the impression that the counterfeit shoes were sold by Amazon itself.

The Luxembourg District Court and Brussels Companies Court had made referrals to the CJEU over the issue.

Both courts can now resume proceedings to determine whether there was any confusion as a result of the adverts and if Amazon should be held liable.

An Amazon spokesperson said: “We will study the court’s decision. Amazon makes it clear to customers who they are buying from when they are shopping in our stores by displaying seller information.”

Alexis Mourot, CEO at Christian Louboutin, said the decision was a victory for all brands defending their intellectual property.

“We have always been committed to protecting our creativity, our uniqueness, and to preserving the relationship of trust with our customers,” Mourot added.

Xavier Ragot, general counsel at Christian Louboutin, added that the decision was a victory in the fight against counterfeiting and would benefit all consumers looking for authentic goods.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Stobbs has applied to strike out a contempt of court application filed against the firm and two of its lawyers
With trademark volumes surging, trademark teams need to think beyond traditional clearance searches, towards a continuous, intelligence-led workflow, says Meghan Medeiros of Corsearch
Brazilian in-house counsel say law firms’ technology investments have not translated into tangible benefits, meaning tech use is a minor factor when selecting advisers
A lack of comfort among some salaried partners shows why law firms must actively foster inclusion, not merely focus on diversity mandates
Arrival of Laura Alonso, alongside a team of 11, will bring ‘significant value’ to ECIJA clients, says CEO
In the first of a two-part article, lawyers at Spruson & Ferguson and Marshall Gerstein provide an overview of China’s system for appealing against patent invalidation decisions
Lawyers and corporate leaders at INTA’s Business of M&A conference in New York discussed how cross-practice collaboration and early in-house involvement can help deals
Lily Li, partner at Morrison Foerster, shares how her litigation team helped secure victory at the ITC in a patent infringement case
Top talking points also included news of an appellate ruling concerning ‘Pisco’ and Indian drugmakers gearing up to launch generic versions of Ozempic as Novo Nordisk’s patent expires
The government’s keenly awaited view on AI and copyright has positive themes but leaves rights owners wanting, says Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard
Gift this article