CJEU: Amazon open to liability over fake Christian Louboutin ads

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

CJEU: Amazon open to liability over fake Christian Louboutin ads

Amazon

Consumers could be misled into thinking counterfeit shoes were sold by Amazon itself, the court ruled yesterday

Amazon can be held liable over adverts for counterfeit Christian Louboutin shoes sold by third parties on the platform, the Court of Justice of the EU ruled yesterday, December 22.

The decision is a major boost to the French shoemaker in its trademark lawsuits against Amazon in Belgium and Luxembourg.

Louboutin claimed that Amazon infringed its rights by displaying adverts for counterfeit shoes, which copied its trademarked red sole.

The CJEU found yesterday that such adverts could give users the impression that the counterfeit shoes were sold by Amazon itself.

The Luxembourg District Court and Brussels Companies Court had made referrals to the CJEU over the issue.

Both courts can now resume proceedings to determine whether there was any confusion as a result of the adverts and if Amazon should be held liable.

An Amazon spokesperson said: “We will study the court’s decision. Amazon makes it clear to customers who they are buying from when they are shopping in our stores by displaying seller information.”

Alexis Mourot, CEO at Christian Louboutin, said the decision was a victory for all brands defending their intellectual property.

“We have always been committed to protecting our creativity, our uniqueness, and to preserving the relationship of trust with our customers,” Mourot added.

Xavier Ragot, general counsel at Christian Louboutin, added that the decision was a victory in the fight against counterfeiting and would benefit all consumers looking for authentic goods.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article