New South Korean guidelines for trademarks in the metaverse
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement
Sponsored content

New South Korean guidelines for trademarks in the metaverse

Sponsored by


Virtual world platforms have created opportunities for brand owners and led to changes to the Trademark Act in South Korea, reports Min Son of Hanol IP & Law

In the wake of the outbreak of the COVID pandemic, there has been a substantial shift from the real world to the metaverse in the way trademarks are used. South Korea, an IT leader and content/design powerhouse, is one of the countries where trademarks are being very actively used in the virtual world.

For example, drawing great attention from the public, luxury brand Gucci opened Gucci Villa on Zepeto, a metaverse platform provided by the South Korean internet portal Naver. Many other famous brands such as Nike, MLB, and DKNY have also opened virtual shops on this platform.

Such platforms are not limited to fashion brands; Samsung Electronics is running a virtual booth called MyHouse for users to experience its various home appliances, and Hyundai Motor’s virtual Motostudio allows users to test-drive its new hybrid cars in Zepeto.

Like multiple virtual world platforms – such as Roblox, Fortnite, or Second Life – operating with a large number of users worldwide, it is said that more than 300 million people use Zepeto over 200 countries around the world, including the United States, China, and Japan, as well as South Korea.

Revised regulations

With the sudden rise of the virtual world, Korea needed new standards in the trademark field to embrace this change. In summer 2022, Korea revised its Trademark Act and added “transmission” of digital goods online as a type of “distribution” of goods that constitutes an act of trademark use. The revision is expected to facilitate legal measures against online trademark infringement.

The Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) also revised its Examination Guidelines for Virtual Goods and updated the rules for determining the similarity of virtual goods. In the past, for example, ‘‘virtual clothing’’ could only be registered as a downloadable image file (virtual clothing) or recorded computer program for virtual clothing (virtual goods) in Class 9. Now, virtual clothing can be registered directly, whereas “virtual goods” not designating specific goods will be rejected for being an unclear description.

Previously, virtual goods filed in the form of downloadable image files for a specific item were considered similar to the image files or computer programs regardless of the field of usage thereof. Now, however, virtual items are regarded as dissimilar to image files or computer programs.

The similarity criteria ‘between’ the virtual goods resemble those of corresponding goods in the real world. For example, as in the real world, a virtual jacket and a virtual coat (both outerwear) are similar goods, whereas virtual clothing and virtual automobiles are dissimilar goods. Importantly, however, under the new system, virtual goods will be presumed to be dissimilar to real goods. Accordingly, virtual clothing and real clothing are dissimilar goods under these guidelines.

Given that virtual goods reflect the name and appearance of real goods, they are arguably similar to real goods. However, the KIPO views that the virtual goods are not likely to cause consumer confusion as to the source of goods with the corresponding actual goods, because the purpose of goods, usage, customers, or distribution channels thereof are different. As an exception, if a filed virtual trademark is identical or similar to a famous trademark, it will be examined as to whether the trademark would cause any confusion with the famous trademark.

New opportunities

The rise of the metaverse presents new opportunities for brand owners – regardless of whether the brand is new, weak, or famous – because it opens up a new space for them. Owners of famous trademarks may enjoy some protection even without filing their marks for virtual goods. However, in order to protect their marks more strongly in the virtual world, it is highly recommended that they file trademarks for virtual goods as well as products in the real world.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Sources debate the implications of an opinion by Delaware’s chief judge Colm Connolly that lambasted the NPE IP Edge
Five partners reveal how delays in examining trademark applications are affecting their advice to clients and how they pitch new work
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Partners at Quinn Emanuel explain how walkie-talkie and real-estate analogies helped them win over a jury at the Eastern District of Texas
The heads of Malaysian firm HHQ’s new technology practice group say they can be frontline advisers on the intersection between AI, blockchain, and IP
Darren Jiron, Finnegan’s managing partner in London, discusses the firm’s growth plans and misconceptions about US firm culture
The EMEA region research cycle has commenced - do not miss this opportunity to nominate your work from 2023!
A former partner at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, which voted to dissolve in October, has joined McCarter & English
As ChatGPT celebrates its first birthday, we are still grappling with a multitude of IP concerns
Sources say an official role at an IP industry body is great for generating business leads, but that shouldn’t be the only motivation behind taking on the responsibility