Sisvel unveils 5G patent pool

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Sisvel unveils 5G patent pool

AdobeStock_209957411 (1).jpeg

The pool contains 14 licensors at launch and will charge $0.50 per 5G device

Patent pool operator Sisvel launched its long-awaited 5G multimode licensing programme today, December 14.

The pool contains 14 licensors including Philips, Mitsubishi, and Siemens and will target licensees in the consumer electronics industry.

Licensees will pay $0.50 per-unit for a 5G multimode device, and lower rates for 4G and 3G devices ($0.42 and $0.25, respectively).

The launch of the pool comes after a series of delays. Sisvel CEO Mattia Fogliacco told Managing IP this was down to the recruitment of additional licensors.

Via Licensing, a competitor of Sisvel’s, announced in April that it was exiting the wireless telecoms market.

Via’s subsidiary, Wireless Innovation, and eight of Via’s licensors have joined Sisvel’s 5G pool instead, a development Fogliacco said would benefit the market.

“The 5G programme is testament to our success in licensing in the mobile telecoms space, which is notoriously difficult unless you are one of the top innovators,” he said.

After Via’s announcement, Sisvel said details of the 5G pool would be available no later than September.

But that deadline was missed because Sisvel was recruiting an additional licensor. That licensor is among the 14 participants named today, Fogliacco said.

Fogliacco said he didn’t expect major 5G SEP owners such as Nokia, Ericsson, and Qualcomm to join the pool as they preferred to license bilaterally.

“More often than not, those companies have existing bilateral agreements that need to be renewed and a pool wouldn’t generate any transactional efficiencies for them,” he said.

But the door remained open to any licensor who wished to join, he added.

The news caps a busy year for Sisvel, which launched a Wi-Fi 6 patent pool with the backing of Huawei in July. It was the first time Huawei had signed up as a licensor for any of Sisvel’s programmes.

Last month, Sisvel also launched its cellular internet of things (IoT) pool with licensors including Ericsson, Sony, and Optis.

The pool includes patents that are declared essential to the LTE-M and Narrowband IoT standards, which are subsets of 4G wireless technology used in IoT devices.

Managing IP last week named Fogliacco as one of the top 50 most influential people in IP.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Erise IP has added a seven-practitioner trademark team from Hovey Williams, signalling its intention to help clients at all stages of development
News of prison sentences for ex-Samsung executives for trade secrets violation and an opposition filed by Taylor Swift were also among the top talking points
A multijurisdictional claim filed by InterDigital and a new spin-off firm in Germany were also among the top talking points
Duarte Lima, MD of Spruson & Ferguson’s Asia practice, says practitioners must adapt to process changes within IP systems, as well as be mindful of the implications of tech on their practices
Practitioners say the UK Supreme Court’s decision could boost the attractiveness of the UK for AI companies
New awards, including US ‘Firm of the Year’ and Latin America ‘Firm to Watch’, are among more than 90 prizes that will recognise firms and practitioners
DWF helped client Dairy UK secure a major victory at the UK Supreme Court
Hepworth Browne led Emotional Perception AI to victory at the UK Supreme Court, which rejected a previous appellate decision that said an AI network was not patentable
James Hill, general counsel at Norwich City FC, reveals how he balances fan engagement with brand enforcement, and when he calls on IP firms for advice
In the second of a two-part article, Gabrielle Faure-André and Stéphanie Garçon at Santarelli unpick EPO, UPC and French case law to assess the importance of clinical development timelines in inventive step analyses
Gift this article