German government: UPC launch date ‘under review’

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

German government: UPC launch date ‘under review’

German-comp.jpg

The three-month sunrise period before the court opens cannot begin until Germany deposits its instrument of ratification

The German government department responsible for triggering the countdown to the Unified Patent Court said a proposed launch date of April 1 was under review.

Germany’s Federal Ministry of Justice (MoJ) told Managing IP it supported the UPC while it attempted to address technology concerns with the electronic case management system (CMS).

“The impact of this work on the launch date of the UPC is under review,” the spokesperson said.

Managing IP understands that UPC organisers could make an announcement regarding start dates in the coming days.

At the moment, organisers are hopeful that a three-month sunrise period, during which users can opt-out their European patents, will begin on January 1 and that the court will open its doors on April 1.

But there has been panic in recent weeks. Numerous users have said they cannot access the CMS or get themselves verified.

After the MoJ deposits its formal instrument of ratification, the sunrise period will start on the first day of the following month.

The MoJ spokesperson added: “Any impact on the timing will be announced promptly on the website of the UPC so that potential users can prepare themselves in good time.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article