German government: UPC launch date ‘under review’

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

German government: UPC launch date ‘under review’

German-comp.jpg

The three-month sunrise period before the court opens cannot begin until Germany deposits its instrument of ratification

The German government department responsible for triggering the countdown to the Unified Patent Court said a proposed launch date of April 1 was under review.

Germany’s Federal Ministry of Justice (MoJ) told Managing IP it supported the UPC while it attempted to address technology concerns with the electronic case management system (CMS).

“The impact of this work on the launch date of the UPC is under review,” the spokesperson said.

Managing IP understands that UPC organisers could make an announcement regarding start dates in the coming days.

At the moment, organisers are hopeful that a three-month sunrise period, during which users can opt-out their European patents, will begin on January 1 and that the court will open its doors on April 1.

But there has been panic in recent weeks. Numerous users have said they cannot access the CMS or get themselves verified.

After the MoJ deposits its formal instrument of ratification, the sunrise period will start on the first day of the following month.

The MoJ spokesperson added: “Any impact on the timing will be announced promptly on the website of the UPC so that potential users can prepare themselves in good time.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
Gift this article