Exclusive: UPC chief judge signals new guidelines on judicial conflicts
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Exclusive: UPC chief judge signals new guidelines on judicial conflicts

Klaus Grabinski at the 5th Annual Paris Conference on Standard Essential Patents

Klaus Grabinski addressed the controversy over part-time UPC judges in an exclusive interview with Managing IP

The Unified Patent Court could issue new guidelines on how to manage judicial conflicts of interest before the new system opens next year, the UPC’s chief judge has revealed.

Klaus Grabinski, president of the UPC Court of Appeal, made the comments exclusively to Managing IP in what was his first interview since he was appointed in October.

The chief judge was speaking to Managing IP live on the sidelines of the 5th Annual Paris Conference on Standard Essential Patents.

He was responding to the controversy over the selection of part-time technically qualified judges. Those judges will continue to practise in law firms or attorney firms while sitting at the UPC. 

Grabinski said the Presidium of the UPC will consider whether to include guidance on potential conflicts in a judicial code of conduct before the UPC Agreement (UPCA) enters into force.

“We could be more precise in drawing the borderlines with regard to conflicts of interest for part-time judges,” he suggested. 

The UPC chief judge added, however, that the use of such judges was a common feature in some UPC member states.

The UPCA is currently scheduled to enter into force on April 1, according to the UPC’s projected timeline.

In the interview, Grabinski also spoke about a likely divergence between the US and the UPC on the availability of injunctive relief, and endorsed the comments of Rian Kalden, his colleague on the UPC Court of Appeal.

Kalden, a Dutch judge, told a conference in Brussels last week that the UPC would not follow a US-style approach, which has effectively done away with injunctive relief in patent cases.

Grabinski also spoke about which aspects of the new system he was most looking forward to, and addressed concerns over the court’s electronic case management system.

The full interview will be published on Managing IP tomorrow, November 24.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The firm was among multiple winners at a record-breaking 2024 ceremony held in London on April 11
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The Americas research cycle has commenced. Do not miss this opportunity to nominate your work!
Increased and new patent fees could affect prosecution strategies for law firms and companies, according to sources
Five former Oblon lawyers felt that joining Merchant & Gould would help them offer the right prices to entice clients
The UK may not be a UPC member but its firms are still acting in proceedings, with Carpmaels among the most prominent
Naomi Pearce of Pearce IP shares how she is helping her firm become a life sciences leader and how generous policies have helped attract top talent
The Court of Appeal has dismissed an appeal filed by Ocado, in what was a key test for transparency at the new court
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer or professional about their life and career
INTA is calling out ‘immoral’ unregistered attendees at the association’s annual meeting, but the debate is more nuanced
Gift this article