USIPA 2022: Vidal says policy now her focus

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

USIPA 2022: Vidal says policy now her focus

20221020123315_IMG_0688.JPG

In her keynote talk in Atlanta, the USPTO director said she wanted to update IP processes and guidance and help shape legislative and judicial rules on patent eligibility

After six months on the road travelling and getting input from stakeholders, USPTO director Kathi Vidal will now focus on policymaking.

The announcement came during Vidal’s keynote talk with AT&T intellectual property CEO Scott Frank at the USIPA’s first national conference in Atlanta yesterday, October 20.

“As we move forward, it’s going to be about policymaking, working on process, updating guidance, et cetera,” she said.

“We don’t just want to do that within the USPTO – we’re going to provide technical comment to Congress as they work on Section 101 and at the Supreme Court level on 101.

“If we can get the system to work better for everyone, that’s what we’re going to do.”

Vidal, who was nominated in October 2021 and became the USPTO chief in April, made pro-bono work her focus when she first took office.

She has already introduced policy change and started processes for policy alterations at the USPTO.

Vidal introduced updated prior art guidance for the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in June and announced that the office would revisit patent eligibility guidance in July.

The director also introduced guidance on Fintiv, the rule that compels PTAB judges to discretionarily deny institution on the basis that parallel district court proceedings will conclude first, in July.

Vidal added that the Global IP Alliance’s founding principles of collaboration, education and diversity and inclusion were fundamental in her mission to improve the IP system and get more people involved in it.

She said that like WIPO, the USPTO had signed at memorandum of understanding with the USIPA, setting out that the two organisations would collaborate on projects designed to improve the global IP ecosystem.

“GLIPA is brilliant. There are so many great ideas out there and we need to make sure there’s more collaboration and that we’re leveraging off each other to bring those to fruition faster.”

Frank, who is also the founder of the Georgia IP Alliance and US IP Alliance, officially launched GLIPA on Wednesday, October 19, after the organisation’s first board meeting.

Disclaimed: Patrick Wingrove is a board member of GLIPA

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Sheppard has added quantum and robotics expertise to its AI industry team to help clients navigate questions around inventorship and IP infringement
The 2026 Americas ceremony recognised outstanding firms and practitioners, along with highlighting impact cases of the year
A development concerning Stephen Thaler’s AI copyright application in India and an integration between IPH group firms were also among the top talking points
As concerns around the little-known litigation tool increase, practitioners say they are educating their clients on how it can be most effective
Kilburn & Strode and Mewburn Ellis are just two firms that have invested heavily in office space – a sign that the legal industry is serious about in-person working
In major recent developments, Dyson snagged another win against Hong Kong-based competitor Dreame and a new AI-powered UPC platform was launched
Mohit and Sidhant Goel decided not to pursue an interim injunction application so that their client, Communications Components Antenna, could benefit from a fast-track trial
Anita Cade, head of Ashurst’s IP and media team in Australia, discusses why law firms that can pull together capability across different practice areas and jurisdictions stand to gain
INTA’s CEO says London-based firms have registered fewer delegates compared to past meetings in San Diego and Atlanta, and questions the 'ethics' of trying to participate without registering
Lobbies and interest groups are among the interveners in a major dispute over whether courts can set patent pool rates
Gift this article