USIPA 2022: Vidal says policy now her focus

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

USIPA 2022: Vidal says policy now her focus

20221020123315_IMG_0688.JPG

In her keynote talk in Atlanta, the USPTO director said she wanted to update IP processes and guidance and help shape legislative and judicial rules on patent eligibility

After six months on the road travelling and getting input from stakeholders, USPTO director Kathi Vidal will now focus on policymaking.

The announcement came during Vidal’s keynote talk with AT&T intellectual property CEO Scott Frank at the USIPA’s first national conference in Atlanta yesterday, October 20.

“As we move forward, it’s going to be about policymaking, working on process, updating guidance, et cetera,” she said.

“We don’t just want to do that within the USPTO – we’re going to provide technical comment to Congress as they work on Section 101 and at the Supreme Court level on 101.

“If we can get the system to work better for everyone, that’s what we’re going to do.”

Vidal, who was nominated in October 2021 and became the USPTO chief in April, made pro-bono work her focus when she first took office.

She has already introduced policy change and started processes for policy alterations at the USPTO.

Vidal introduced updated prior art guidance for the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in June and announced that the office would revisit patent eligibility guidance in July.

The director also introduced guidance on Fintiv, the rule that compels PTAB judges to discretionarily deny institution on the basis that parallel district court proceedings will conclude first, in July.

Vidal added that the Global IP Alliance’s founding principles of collaboration, education and diversity and inclusion were fundamental in her mission to improve the IP system and get more people involved in it.

She said that like WIPO, the USPTO had signed at memorandum of understanding with the USIPA, setting out that the two organisations would collaborate on projects designed to improve the global IP ecosystem.

“GLIPA is brilliant. There are so many great ideas out there and we need to make sure there’s more collaboration and that we’re leveraging off each other to bring those to fruition faster.”

Frank, who is also the founder of the Georgia IP Alliance and US IP Alliance, officially launched GLIPA on Wednesday, October 19, after the organisation’s first board meeting.

Disclaimed: Patrick Wingrove is a board member of GLIPA

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
Gift this article