Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement
Sponsored content

The effect of China’s patent law on partial design applications

Sponsored by


Danchen Cheng of Liu Shen & Associates discusses the consequences of China’s amended patent law for partial design patent applications

On June 1 2021, the revised Patent Law of China came into effect, clarifying that the protectable subject matter of design includes the partial design of a product (Article 2, Clause 4). Incorporating partial design into the patent law is a major breakthrough that came in response to rising calls from across the Chinese IP landscape.

Revisions to the Implementing Rules of the Patent Law and the Guidelines for Patent Examination are in the legislative pipeline. Below are the key take-aways for partial design applications based on these revisions, which represent just some of the legislative changes that may happen in the future. Nonetheless, we do not think there will be significant changes.

Key take-aways

1. Product name

When applying for a partial design, the claimed part as well as the whole product to which the part belongs shall be specified in the product name, such as ‘door of a vehicle’.

2. Views to be submitted

When applying for a partial design, a view of the whole product shall be submitted, and the claimed part shall be designated by a combination of solid lines and dotted lines, or in other ways, such as by covering the disclaimed parts with a translucent layer of single colour.

The view of the whole product shall not only show clearly the claimed part, but also reveal its position and proportion in the whole product. Where the claimed part contains a stereoscopic shape, the submitted view shall include a perspective view showing the part clearly.

3. Priority claim

According to Article 29 of the Patent Law, the priority claim of a design application can be a foreign priority or a national priority.

The drafted guidelines do not stipulate any special standard for judging ‘the same subject matter’ particular for partial design. Therefore, it can be construed that the feasibility standard for priority claim for integral design shall also apply to partial design.

That is, a later design application can claim priority over the first filing design application, only if the design claimed in the later design application has been shown in the first filing design application, regardless of whether it is the integral design or partial design being claimed in the later design application. In addition, regardless of the original, the later design application can choose to claim either the integral design or the partial design.

4. Graphical User Interface (GUI)

For a GUI that is applicable to any electronic device, it is allowed for an applicant to file only views regarding the GUI itself, without the product. However, the product name in the design application shall include “GUI of electronic equipment”, such as “a navigation GUI for electronic devices”.

When applying for a design patent for a part of the GUI, the product name shall also indicate the claimed part, such as ‘a search bar of a mobile payment GUI of electronic devices’.

5. Voluntary amendments

Changes to the claimed subject matter, which do not go beyond the scope indicated by the initial views, are allowed within two months from the date of filing. However, after the two-month window, the following amendments will not be allowed:

  • From an integral design to a partial design;

  • From a partial design to an integral design; and

  • From a partial design to another partial design.

6. Divisional application

A partial design application cannot be divided from a parent design application claiming integral designs, and vice versa.

7. Validity issues

According to Article 23, Clause 2 of China’s Patent Law, the design for which the patent right is granted shall be significantly different from the prior design or the combination of prior design features.

When determining whether there is a significant difference of a partial design, the shape, pattern and colour of the claimed part, as well as its position and proportion in the product, will be considered, and the principle of overall observation and comprehensive judgement also applies.

For integral design, the points, lines and surfaces randomly picked from the prior design do not belong to the prior design features that can be used for combination. However, for partial design, these parts of the prior design can be regarded as the prior design feature available for combination.

Above are the prospects of some implementation details of partial design under the new patent law. The establishment of the partial design protection system in China is a positive signal that the government is strengthening the protection of design patents. We expect that partial design will begin to play a more active role in, and make increasing contributions to, the design industry.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Civil society and industry representatives met in Geneva on Thursday, September 28 to discuss a potential expansion of the TRIPS waiver
Sources say the beta version of the USPTO’s new trademark search tool is a big improvement over the current system but that it isn’t perfect
Canadian counsel weigh in on the IP office’s decision to raise trademark filing fees in 2024 and how they’re preparing clients
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Shira Perlmutter, US Register of Copyrights, discussed the Copyright Office's role in forming generative AI policy during a House of Representatives hearing
The award marks one of the highest-ever damages received by a foreign company in a trademark infringement suit in China
Two orders denying public access to documents have reignited a debate over a lack of transparency at the new court
Rouse’s new chief of operations and the firm’s CEO tell Managing IP why they think private equity backing will help it conquer Europe
Brian Landry, partner at Saul Ewing, reveals how applicants can prosecute patent applications in the wake of the Federal Circuit's In re Cellect ruling
Ronelle Geldenhuys of Australia’s Foundry IP considers the implications complex computer technologies such as AI have on decision-making