The effect of China’s patent law on partial design applications
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement
Sponsored content

The effect of China’s patent law on partial design applications

Sponsored by


Danchen Cheng of Liu Shen & Associates discusses the consequences of China’s amended patent law for partial design patent applications

On June 1 2021, the revised Patent Law of China came into effect, clarifying that the protectable subject matter of design includes the partial design of a product (Article 2, Clause 4). Incorporating partial design into the patent law is a major breakthrough that came in response to rising calls from across the Chinese IP landscape.

Revisions to the Implementing Rules of the Patent Law and the Guidelines for Patent Examination are in the legislative pipeline. Below are the key take-aways for partial design applications based on these revisions, which represent just some of the legislative changes that may happen in the future. Nonetheless, we do not think there will be significant changes.

Key take-aways

1. Product name

When applying for a partial design, the claimed part as well as the whole product to which the part belongs shall be specified in the product name, such as ‘door of a vehicle’.

2. Views to be submitted

When applying for a partial design, a view of the whole product shall be submitted, and the claimed part shall be designated by a combination of solid lines and dotted lines, or in other ways, such as by covering the disclaimed parts with a translucent layer of single colour.

The view of the whole product shall not only show clearly the claimed part, but also reveal its position and proportion in the whole product. Where the claimed part contains a stereoscopic shape, the submitted view shall include a perspective view showing the part clearly.

3. Priority claim

According to Article 29 of the Patent Law, the priority claim of a design application can be a foreign priority or a national priority.

The drafted guidelines do not stipulate any special standard for judging ‘the same subject matter’ particular for partial design. Therefore, it can be construed that the feasibility standard for priority claim for integral design shall also apply to partial design.

That is, a later design application can claim priority over the first filing design application, only if the design claimed in the later design application has been shown in the first filing design application, regardless of whether it is the integral design or partial design being claimed in the later design application. In addition, regardless of the original, the later design application can choose to claim either the integral design or the partial design.

4. Graphical User Interface (GUI)

For a GUI that is applicable to any electronic device, it is allowed for an applicant to file only views regarding the GUI itself, without the product. However, the product name in the design application shall include “GUI of electronic equipment”, such as “a navigation GUI for electronic devices”.

When applying for a design patent for a part of the GUI, the product name shall also indicate the claimed part, such as ‘a search bar of a mobile payment GUI of electronic devices’.

5. Voluntary amendments

Changes to the claimed subject matter, which do not go beyond the scope indicated by the initial views, are allowed within two months from the date of filing. However, after the two-month window, the following amendments will not be allowed:

  • From an integral design to a partial design;

  • From a partial design to an integral design; and

  • From a partial design to another partial design.

6. Divisional application

A partial design application cannot be divided from a parent design application claiming integral designs, and vice versa.

7. Validity issues

According to Article 23, Clause 2 of China’s Patent Law, the design for which the patent right is granted shall be significantly different from the prior design or the combination of prior design features.

When determining whether there is a significant difference of a partial design, the shape, pattern and colour of the claimed part, as well as its position and proportion in the product, will be considered, and the principle of overall observation and comprehensive judgement also applies.

For integral design, the points, lines and surfaces randomly picked from the prior design do not belong to the prior design features that can be used for combination. However, for partial design, these parts of the prior design can be regarded as the prior design feature available for combination.

Above are the prospects of some implementation details of partial design under the new patent law. The establishment of the partial design protection system in China is a positive signal that the government is strengthening the protection of design patents. We expect that partial design will begin to play a more active role in, and make increasing contributions to, the design industry.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The firm was among multiple winners at a record-breaking 2024 ceremony held in London on April 11
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The Americas research cycle has commenced. Do not miss this opportunity to nominate your work!
Increased and new patent fees could affect prosecution strategies for law firms and companies, according to sources
Five former Oblon lawyers felt that joining Merchant & Gould would help them offer the right prices to entice clients
The UK may not be a UPC member but its firms are still acting in proceedings, with Carpmaels among the most prominent
Naomi Pearce of Pearce IP shares how she is helping her firm become a life sciences leader and how generous policies have helped attract top talent
The Court of Appeal has dismissed an appeal filed by Ocado, in what was a key test for transparency at the new court
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer or professional about their life and career
INTA is calling out ‘immoral’ unregistered attendees at the association’s annual meeting, but the debate is more nuanced
Gift this article