AIPPI 2022: Speakers tout benefits of open innovation

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

AIPPI 2022: Speakers tout benefits of open innovation

AIPPISharingEdit3.jpg
Isabella Fu (left) and Jason Skinder (right) delve into open innovation.

Sharing IP can be good for social action, crypto and employee retention, said AIPPI panellists from Microsoft, Lear Corporation and Block

There are a lot of benefits to open innovation and allowing businesses to share data and code, according to panellists at AIPPI’s World Congress yesterday, September 11, in San Francisco.

Lawyers from Microsoft, Lear and Block said a certain amount of sharing could help companies retain talent and improve technologies.

Isabella Fu, associate general counsel at Microsoft in Washington, noted that attitudes towards open source had shifted.

“When I first joined Microsoft in 2003, the view was that open source was a cancer. That’s not necessarily the case today, so you can see how a company can transform,” she said.

Apple had a similar change, according to Jason Skinder, chief intellectual property counsel at Lear in Detroit, who worked for the iPhone maker from 2011 to 2017.

He noted that Apple was a very secretive company but was starting to loosen up, adding that it was difficult for any firm to attract and retain talent unless they contributed to open source.

Businesses should consider the benefits of sharing data too, said speakers.

Fu noted that Microsoft and other companies signed onto the Open Source Climate initiative to make data available to fight climate change.

Companies’ willingness to share data will vary depending on their business strategies, said counsel.

Skinder, who worked at Honeywell from 2020 to March 2022, said his former employer realised its products generated tonnes of data and that it could sell this information to customers.

Honeywell was fine with sharing as much data as it had because the data itself wasn’t valuable, said Skinder.

“What was valuable was what they did with the data,” he added.

But he noted that the company kept its model and insights from the model proprietary.

Perfect pledges

Speakers also touted the benefits of patent pledges and the promises not to sue each other for IP infringement.

Fu said Microsoft had signed the Open COVID Pledge and the Low Carbon Patent Pledge, agreeing to make its patents freely available to fight the pandemic and climate change.

But such agreements could be difficult to implement in certain circumstances.

Max Sills, counsel at Block in San Francisco, said he led the Crypto Open Patent Alliance, in which members promised never to use their crypto patents against anyone except for defensive purposes.

“My job is to persuade people not to sue each other. I thought that it would be a much easier job than it was, but it’s a hard job and I don’t know why,” he said.

He added that innovation was happening fast in the industry and that inventors didn't need monopolies to be creative.

Some patent holders may have been hesitant to sign the pledge because the industry was new and they were scared, he said.

Perfect protection

Patent protection was still important to a lot of companies even if they were contributing code to open source, said panellists.

Fu at Microsoft said open-source licensors could make the use of code conditional. They could require others to promise not to use the code for certain purposes or not to sue them.

“You still need a patent portfolio. If you don’t have those rights, you can’t get people playing in your sandbox the way you want,” she said.

Sebastian Wündisch, lawyer at Noerr in Germany, also spoke on the panel, and Calum Smyth, partner at Wiggin in London, moderated the talk.

AIPPI is taking place this week at the Marriott Marquis in San Francisco.

 

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The UK-India trade deal doesn’t mention legal services, showing India has again failed to agree on a move that could help foreign firms and local practitioners
Eva-Maria Strobel reveals some of the firm’s IP achievements and its approach to client relationships
Lateral hires at Thompson Hine and Pierson Ferdinand said they were inspired by fresh business opportunities and innovative strategies at their new firms
The launch of a new IP insurance product and INTA hiring a former USPTO commissioner were also among the top talking points this week
The firm explains how it secured a $170.6 million verdict against the government in a patent dispute surrounding airport technology, and why the case led to interest from other inventors
Developments of note included the court partially allowing a claim concerning confidentiality clubs and a decision involving technology used in football matches
The firm said adding capability in the French capital completes its coverage of all major patent litigation jurisdictions as it strives for UPC excellence
Marc Fenster explains how keeping the jury focused on the most relevant facts helped secure a $279m win for his client against Samsung
Clients are divided on what externally funded IP firms bring to the table, so those firms must prove why the benefits outweigh the downsides
Rahul Bhartiya, AI coordinator at the EUIPO, discusses the office’s strategy, collaboration with other IP offices, and getting rid of routine tasks
Gift this article