Breaking: Tillis releases Section 101 bill

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Breaking: Tillis releases Section 101 bill

ThomTillisRightSizeCOVER.jpg
Senator Thom Tillis. Credit: Gage Skidmore

The senator’s proposed Section 101 legislation would cut down on exceptions to patent eligibility in the US

Senator Thom Tillis has presented legislation to reform subject matter eligibility law in the US, it was announced today, August 3.

The Patent Eligibility Restoration Act, which was introduced yesterday evening, will limit exceptions to patent eligibility set out in Section 101 under Title 35 of the US Code if enacted.

The act is the first solid attempt by legislators to bring certainty to Section 101, which has become increasingly complicated since the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) issued its rulings in Mayo, Myriad and Alice in the 2010s.

The news comes just over a month after SCOTUS rejected an appeal request in American Axle v Neapco, dashing hopes of a judicial fix to the uncertain legal framework built around Section 101.

Tillis’s new bill will clarify that anyone who invents or discovers any useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any useful improvement can obtain a patent, subject only to the exclusions outlined in the bill.

Exceptions include mathematical formulas, mental processes performed solely in the human mind, processes occurring in nature wholly independent of and prior to any human activity, and unmodified genes as they exist in the human body.

Applicants wouldn’t generally be able to obtain patents for non-technological economic, financial, business, social, cultural or artistic processes either.

If accepted by the US legislature, the act will clarify that applicants can obtain patents on processes if they are embodied in machines.

But such patents wouldn’t be eligible if the machine was recited in a patent claim without integrating, beyond merely storing and executing, the steps of the process that the machine performed.

The proposed legislation also stated that patent eligibility should be determined on the basis of the claimed invention as a whole and without discontinuing or disregarding any claim elements.

It also set out that eligibility should be determined solely under Section 101.

Under the legislation, examiners wouldn’t be allowed to consider the manner in which claimed inventions were made, whether claim elements were known, conventional, routine, or naturally occurring, or the state of the art at the time of inventions when determining eligibility.

They also wouldn’t be allowed to consider novelty, non-obviousness and enablement when weighing in on subject matter eligibility.

The senator’s proposed legislation would also amend Section 100, clarifying that ‘process’ meant process, art or method, and could include a use, application, or method of manufacture of a known or naturally occurring process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, or material.

It would define ‘useful’ to mean an invention or discovery that had a specific and practical utility from the perspective of a person of ordinary skill in the art.

Tillis and other senators have already made several attempts to address Section 101 problems.

In March 2021, Tillis and senators Mazie Hirono, Tom Cotton and Christopher Coons sent a letter to the USPTO requesting that the office release information on the state of patent eligibility in the US. The office released this report in June.

Tillis also proposed draft legislation to reform Section 101 in 2019 alongside Coons and representatives Doug Collins, Hank Johnson and Steve Stivers, shortly before chairing three days of hearings with the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual Property.

It’s unclear how likely this bill is to pass.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Tuesday's coverage includes BD tips for aspiring partners, and a foray into the world of SEPs
Exclusive data reveals law firms are failing to go above and beyond for their corporate clients, with in-house counsel saying advisers should consider more transparent billing processes
Arty Rajendra and Gary Moss discuss why ‘thorough and intense’ preparation, plus the odd glass of wine, led to a record FRAND victory for their client
Monday’s coverage includes news of a potentially 'game-changing' trademark development in China and how practitioners are using AI
Managing IP gives a taster of the numbers behind this year’s IP STARS trademark rankings, and looks back at our 2025 award winners
Updates from IP offices, the shifting requirements of in-house counsel, and news of London 2026 were among major talking points on Sunday
Etienne Sanz de Acedo discusses the association’s three-year plan, what he is looking forward to in San Diego, and why London came calling for 2026
Professionals from three organisations reveal what led them to sponsor Brand Action and why doing so can build camaraderie
The results of a UK government consultation on the exhaustion of IP rights and an annual review published by the EPO’s Boards of Appeal were also among the top talking points this week
The decision disregards Perlmutter’s work at the US Copyright Office and comes at a time when strong leadership and expertise are crucial
Gift this article