Avoid legal risks when pushing the boundaries of brands

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Avoid legal risks when pushing the boundaries of brands

Sponsored by

twobirds-400px.jpg
big-ben-2393098.jpg

Emma Green of Bird & Bird provides four tips on successfully embracing environmental, social and governance (ESG) values in branding in the UK

Long gone are the days when ESG was a tick box exercise: operating a successful brand in today’s social climate means having a strong ethos, clear principles and even a drive to inspire change.

However, getting the attention of your audience can carry legal risks. Brands need to exercise caution to ensure the headlines they are making are the right ones and to avoid going viral for all the wrong reasons. Four key considerations are:

1. Use of third-party brands carries infringement risk:

Advertising to inspire activism usually means the content needs to be provocative. The temptation to call out big brands on their failures can be significant, especially for growth-stage challenger brands or competitors who think they are doing a better job. However, commercial use of a third-party brand name or logo that is registered as a trademark in relation to the same goods or services is, most likely, still going to be an infringement.

In the absence of registered rights, such use may also be an actionable passing off in the UK. This triggers a significant risk of legal action, in particular injunctive relief to stop such use, regardless of the length of the campaign or how honourable the motivation.

Costs awards for the losing party can be significant, with liability arising for the other side’s costs as a minimum. Take specialised legal advice on any particularly incendiary advertising to avoid campaigns backfiring in unwanted public relations and legal costs.

2. Be mindful of the regulatory environment:

Doing good does not give brands carte blanche on the statements they make. In the UK, the Advertising Standards Agency (ASA) supports the legislative framework and regulates comparative advertising claims and adverts targeted at specific demographics. It also enforces the prohibition on political advertising under the Communications Act 2003.

The ASA has the power to ban adverts and seek amendments to claims, and can even apply pressure to have advertising space revoked and request that search engines discontinue paid-for ads or display a notice when someone searches for the sanctioned brand.

3. Substantiate claims:

Promoting a specific value of your brand can generate consumer interest but those claims need to stand up to scrutiny. Avoid the temptation to exaggerate: do you have evidence to support the claim you want to make, is it sufficiently objective, and is it free from misleading statements?

Particularly topical is the field of sustainability: allegations of greenwashing can quickly undermine the good work a brand is actually doing to improve its ecological credentials, so make sure claims can be supported.

4. Exercise caution with partners:

Working with third parties and influencers can help push a brand message to a new audience. Draw up a clear framework on permitted statements and agree on any topics and messaging which is off limits.

In the current cancel culture climate, a faux pas with one partner can have a significant knock-on impact with other sponsors or clients, so choose collaborations wisely and make sure contracts are in place to document each side’s responsibilities.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Deals between five more law firms and President Trump and an antitrust lawsuit against Amgen were also among the top talking points this week
US counsel explain how they win new cleantech IP business and how they’re navigating the industry’s challenges
Leaders at the IP firms, which have joined forces with backing from a PE investor, share their vision of building the number one pan-European IP practice
Firms will steer clients towards other ways of getting quicker examinations, but fear the ramifications of the USPTO’s decision
Melissa Haapala added that returning to client advocacy and the chance to work on patent litigation were reasons for returning to private practice
Michelle Clark, who has a generalist litigation background, plans to focus on IP disputes at Alston & Bird
Philips and Vivo have entered into a licensing agreement, putting an end to a five-year-old telecom SEP dispute in India
Stefan Müller discusses managing deadlines, the importance of reflection, and why IP is more than just a 'nice to have'
The three founders of the IP firm’s new US offering say they plan to offer a unique proposition in a market fixated by the billable hour
The opinion provides useful guidance when it comes to how courts might consider contributory infringement, DMCA claims, and other issues in AI copyright cases
Gift this article