UK to expand data mining freedoms for AI

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

UK to expand data mining freedoms for AI

Datamining

The UKIPO published the results of its consultation on AI and IP today, June 28, and plans to shake up the rules on copyright and data

The UK will expand its data mining exception to copyright following a review of its artificial intelligence policies, the UKIPO announced today, June 28.

The UKIPO confirmed the policy as it published the results of its consultation, which ran from October 2021 to January 2022, on intellectual property and AI.

As part of that review, the UKIPO had asked stakeholders whether the UK’s current patent and copyright laws were fit for dealing with IP issues in the AI sector.

One of the biggest issues up for debate in the UK and internationally was whether IP offices should grant patents which list AI applications as the inventor.

But the UKIPO has decided against any move in that direction and limited its most substantial policy changes to the field of copyright.

The biggest change in IP policy will be an expanded copyright exception for data mining, a process where software is used to analyse data, including for the purposes of training AI.

The government plans that anyone with lawful access to copyright-protected material will be able to carry out this analysis without further permission from the copyright owner.

Copyright owners will still be able to control access to their data, but won’t be able to charge interested parties extra for the purposes of mining.

Data mining of copyrighted material is already legal in the UK but only for non-commercial use, meaning that the current exception doesn’t apply for the training of many AI programs.

Matt Hervey, head of AI law at Gowling WLG in London, said the new UK policy compared favourably to EU rules, which allow data mining but subject to an opt-out by the copyright owner.

"The UK government is proposing a very pro-innovation position for text and data mining," Hervey said.

"The lack of an opt-out is more favourable to commercial AI innovation than the EU rules, and supports our world-class AI industry," he added.

Science and innovation minister George Freeman said the UK’s copyright framework would be one of the most AI-friendly in the world.

“Our new UK rules on copyright and data mining will act as a catalyst for our innovators to flourish, helping ensure the UK’s IP system remains a powerful enabler for ground-breaking R&D,” Freeman said.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Six hires across the IP spectrum reflect Orrick’s efforts to better serve tech clients across the IP lifecycle
David Stone, partner at White & Case, argues that the government’s planned reforms will modernise and futureproof UK design law, but leave two of the thorniest problems unresolved
Max Scott will join the firm’s IP transactions group in California, becoming the latest Weil IP partner to secure their future
Yonatan Drori, attorney at Drori-Stav IP in Israel, explains why foreign counsel must treat Israel’s patent disclosure requirements as an ongoing obligation, rather than a one-off formality
From Japan to Southeast Asia, domestic and regional firms picked up some of the biggest prizes, while key foreign players maintained momentum
Earlier this month, Managing IP had exclusively reported that the French arm of Taylor Wessing was minded to pull out of the deal
Our latest podcast examines how Weil’s IP practice evolved, where its practitioners could (and will) go next, and which firms and markets stand to benefit from the redistribution of talent
Former Latham partner Chris Henry and transactions lawyer Liza Cotter are heading to the firm as Weil’s IP practice starts to disperse
Rival IP teams return to court for a closely watched appeal over AI and copyright, but observers hoping for answers to some of the technology’s biggest legal questions may be left disappointed
Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Gift this article