UK to expand data mining freedoms for AI

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

UK to expand data mining freedoms for AI

Datamining

The UKIPO published the results of its consultation on AI and IP today, June 28, and plans to shake up the rules on copyright and data

The UK will expand its data mining exception to copyright following a review of its artificial intelligence policies, the UKIPO announced today, June 28.

The UKIPO confirmed the policy as it published the results of its consultation, which ran from October 2021 to January 2022, on intellectual property and AI.

As part of that review, the UKIPO had asked stakeholders whether the UK’s current patent and copyright laws were fit for dealing with IP issues in the AI sector.

One of the biggest issues up for debate in the UK and internationally was whether IP offices should grant patents which list AI applications as the inventor.

But the UKIPO has decided against any move in that direction and limited its most substantial policy changes to the field of copyright.

The biggest change in IP policy will be an expanded copyright exception for data mining, a process where software is used to analyse data, including for the purposes of training AI.

The government plans that anyone with lawful access to copyright-protected material will be able to carry out this analysis without further permission from the copyright owner.

Copyright owners will still be able to control access to their data, but won’t be able to charge interested parties extra for the purposes of mining.

Data mining of copyrighted material is already legal in the UK but only for non-commercial use, meaning that the current exception doesn’t apply for the training of many AI programs.

Matt Hervey, head of AI law at Gowling WLG in London, said the new UK policy compared favourably to EU rules, which allow data mining but subject to an opt-out by the copyright owner.

"The UK government is proposing a very pro-innovation position for text and data mining," Hervey said.

"The lack of an opt-out is more favourable to commercial AI innovation than the EU rules, and supports our world-class AI industry," he added.

Science and innovation minister George Freeman said the UK’s copyright framework would be one of the most AI-friendly in the world.

“Our new UK rules on copyright and data mining will act as a catalyst for our innovators to flourish, helping ensure the UK’s IP system remains a powerful enabler for ground-breaking R&D,” Freeman said.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
Gift this article