Preparing for the Unitary Patent

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Preparing for the Unitary Patent

Sponsored by

inspicos-400px recrop.jpg
christian-lue-8yw6tsb8tnc-unsplash.jpg

Jakob Pade Frederiksen of Inspicos P/S discusses the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court regime expected to enter into force by early 2023

The Unitary Patent (UP) and Unified Patent Court (UPC) regime is expected to enter into force in late 2022 or early 2023. Under the future system, patentees may request unitary effect for their patents in the 17 EU States currently participating to the system. Patents with unitary effect will not have to undergo country-by-country validation. 

The exact date of entry into force of the new system will be triggered by Germany’s depositing of its instrument of ratification of the Unified Patent Court Agreement. 

In preparation for the coming into existence of the new system, the EPO has implemented transitional measures applicable to European patent applications having reached the final stage of the grant proceedings. 

The measures will be available for European patent applications, in respect of which the EPO has issued its communication under Rule 71(3) EPC informing the applicant of the intention to grant a patent. 

The first transitional measure provides the possibility for applicants to file a request for unitary effect before the entry into force of the new system. Once the UP system has started, the EPO will register unitary effect. Requests for unitary effect cannot, however, be validly filed before Germany deposits its instrument of ratification, or before the communication under Rule 71(3) EPC has been issued.

The second transitional measure enables applicants to request a delay in the EPO’s issuing of the decision to grant a European patent until immediately after the entry into force of the  UP system. Patentees may thus benefit from unitary protection and hence avoid country-by-country validation in the 17 participating countries. However, only requests filed after the date of Germany’s depositing of its instrument of ratification will be allowed. 

In respect of cases, where time limits for replying to ‘office actions’, i.e., communications under Article 94(3) EPC, or time limits under Rule 71(3) EPC, are already running, applicants who wish to benefit from unitary protection may consider not lodging early replies with the EPO. Rather, applicants may wish to benefit from the full reply periods available in order to increase their chances of being able to benefit from the transitional measures.

 

 

Jakob Pade Frederiksen

Partner, Inspicos P/S

E: jpf@inspicos.com

 

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
Gift this article