Transfer of trademarks to the Greek Industrial Property Organisation
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Transfer of trademarks to the Greek Industrial Property Organisation

Sponsored by

patrinos-logo.png
Greece, IP, trademark

Youli Angelou of Patrinos & Kilimiris explains why the consolidation of all branches of industrial property is a welcome move

Law No. 4796/2021 (Articles 33-48, Government Gazette 63/April 17 2021) provides the transfer of the responsibilities regarding trademarks from the Directorate of the General Secretariat for Trademarks of the Ministry of Development and Investments to the Greek Industrial Property Organisation (OBI), which is supervised by the Ministry of Development and Investments. 

The responsibilities for the Greek trademark of products and services, as provided in Law No. 4072/2012 on trademarks remain in the Directorate of Trademarks of the General Secretariat for Trademarks of the Ministry of Development and Investments. Therefore, based on the new law: 

  • The OBI Is responsible for the physical (paper) and electronic register of trademarks, the trademarks archive, the information systems, the software and the corresponding systems that support the operation of the registry and the archive of the Administrative Commission for Trademarks (Article 35);

  • The OBI is designated as the competent national authority for verifying the authenticity of the final decisions of the EUIPO (Article 33§5); and

  • The OBI participates and represents Greece on trademark issues in the EUIPO, WIPO and any corresponding European or international organisation or body and is responsible for all communication and cooperation with these organisations (Article 33§7).

A Joint Ministerial Decision (JMD) of the Ministry of Development and Investments as well as of the Ministry of Finance is expected to regulate all the necessary details of the transfer of organisational, technical and practical nature to complete the transfer of the physical (paper) and electronic register of trademarks, the information and other corresponding systems that support it, the trademarks archive as well as the adequate staffing of ΟΒΙ.

The main objective of this transfer is the assumption of full responsibility by one body as well as the administrative concentration/integration of all branches of industrial property in one entity, thus aiming at a more efficient strengthening of trade. Moreover, this transfer aims at a uniform and unified national policy with regard to all industrial property rights, thus bringing Greece in line with the practice of other countries.

In view of the above, the consolidation of all branches of industrial property in one body can only bring positive results. 

 

Youli Angelou
Associate, Patrinos & Kilimiris

E: yangelou@patrinoskilimiris.com


 

 

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

View the Social Impact EMEA Awards 2024 shortlist and join us on September 12 at The Waldorf Hotel in London
James Tumbridge talks about advising the government on AI and why his day could start with the police and end with legal networking
Data from Managing IP+’s Talent Tracker shows that the IP ambitions of Asian full-service firms and a life sciences focus in the US have prompted lateral moves
Michelle Lue-Reid has joined the IP business as its chief transformation officer and will look to implement major change initiatives across member firms
Chad Landmon, who joins in Washington DC, hopes to expand the firm’s Hatch-Waxman practice
The FRAND rate is only 5 cents higher than the per-device rate determined at first instance in 2023
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Nearly four months after joining Crowell & Moring, Edward Taelman reflects on starting afresh, new clients, and firm culture
Firms discuss the ebb and flow of life sciences IP work and explain how they help professionals pivot between specialities
Mercedes-Benz, Dolby Laboratories, and Panasonic discuss the merits and drawbacks of the USPTO's terminal disclaimer proposal
Gift this article