France moves towards harmonising law on ownership of inventions and software
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

France moves towards harmonising law on ownership of inventions and software

Sponsored by

beau-de-lomenie.png
binary-code-4826796-1280.jpg

New rules now apply in France to inventions and software created by individuals who are neither private nor state sector employees, as Gaston Vedel of Cabinet Beau de Loménie explains

Order No. 2021-1658 of December 15 2021 concerns the attribution of IP rights relating to assets generated by software developers and inventors who are neither company employees nor civil servants and who have been working in a company or public institute carrying out research. This order has introduced new provisions into the French Intellectual Property Code (CPI), namely Articles L 113-9-1 and L 611-7-1.

These new provisions seek to extend the existing rules concerning patentable inventions (Article L 611-7 CPI) and software (Article L 113-9 CPI) created by public or state sector employees to other categories of authors and inventors.

These categories include interns, PhD students, scholarship students from overseas and emeritus professors or directors, who have been working in a company or public institute carrying out research acting as a host institution.

The new provisions provide that the host institution will own inventions or software created by an inventor or author in the context of their regular activities/mission or on the basis of explicit instructions given by the host institution. They also provide for the possible assignment to the host institution of certain inventions not resulting from the regular activities of the inventor or from instructions that are explicitly entrusted to the inventor. 

These provisions will apply whatever the type of host institution having an R&D activity (public or private), provided that the inventor or developer is bound to the host institution by an agreement and, as regards software, that the author was working under the orders of a manager and received compensation for the work carried out.

The new provisions seek to simplify the situation for institutions carrying out research and to harmonise the situation with respect to staff members being company employees or civil servants.

An implementing decree is expected to define in more detail the nature of the financial compensation which will be due to the inventors or developers.

Articles L 113-9-1 and L 611-7-1 entered into force on December 17 2021 and apply to inventions or software created from this date.

 

Gaston Vedel

IP lawyer, Cabinet Beau de Loménie

E: gvedel@bdl-ip.com

 

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partners and other senior leaders must step up if they want diverse talent at their firms to thrive
European and US counsel reveal why they are (or aren't) concerned about patent quality and explain how external counsel can help
Firms such as Bird & Bird and Taylor Wessing have reported rising profits and highlighted the role of high-profile IP disputes and hires
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Lawyers in the corporate and IP practices discuss where the firm can steal a march on competitors, its growth plans in London, and why deal lawyers are ‘concertmasters’
Kathleen Gaynor, DEI specialist at Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick, says deliberate actions can help law firms reach diversity goals
Scott McKeown, who moved to Wolf Greenfield one year ago, says the change has helped him tap into life sciences work and advise more patent owners
The winners of our Asia-Pacific Awards 2024 will be revealed during a ceremony in Malaysia on September 26
Zach Piccolomini of Wolf Greenfield explains how to maximise your IP portfolio’s value while keeping an eye on competitors
Witnesses at a Congressional hearing debated whether reforming the ITC is necessary and considered what any changes should look like
Gift this article