France moves towards harmonising law on ownership of inventions and software

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

France moves towards harmonising law on ownership of inventions and software

Sponsored by

beau-de-lomenie.png
binary-code-4826796-1280.jpg

New rules now apply in France to inventions and software created by individuals who are neither private nor state sector employees, as Gaston Vedel of Cabinet Beau de Loménie explains

Order No. 2021-1658 of December 15 2021 concerns the attribution of IP rights relating to assets generated by software developers and inventors who are neither company employees nor civil servants and who have been working in a company or public institute carrying out research. This order has introduced new provisions into the French Intellectual Property Code (CPI), namely Articles L 113-9-1 and L 611-7-1.

These new provisions seek to extend the existing rules concerning patentable inventions (Article L 611-7 CPI) and software (Article L 113-9 CPI) created by public or state sector employees to other categories of authors and inventors.

These categories include interns, PhD students, scholarship students from overseas and emeritus professors or directors, who have been working in a company or public institute carrying out research acting as a host institution.

The new provisions provide that the host institution will own inventions or software created by an inventor or author in the context of their regular activities/mission or on the basis of explicit instructions given by the host institution. They also provide for the possible assignment to the host institution of certain inventions not resulting from the regular activities of the inventor or from instructions that are explicitly entrusted to the inventor. 

These provisions will apply whatever the type of host institution having an R&D activity (public or private), provided that the inventor or developer is bound to the host institution by an agreement and, as regards software, that the author was working under the orders of a manager and received compensation for the work carried out.

The new provisions seek to simplify the situation for institutions carrying out research and to harmonise the situation with respect to staff members being company employees or civil servants.

An implementing decree is expected to define in more detail the nature of the financial compensation which will be due to the inventors or developers.

Articles L 113-9-1 and L 611-7-1 entered into force on December 17 2021 and apply to inventions or software created from this date.

 

Gaston Vedel

IP lawyer, Cabinet Beau de Loménie

E: gvedel@bdl-ip.com

 

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Public figures are turning to trademark protection to combat the threat of AI deepfakes and are monetising their brand through licensing deals, a trend that law firms are keen to capitalise on
News of Avanci Video signing its first video licence and a win for patent innovators in Australia were also among the top talking points
Tom Melsheimer, part of a nine-partner team to join King & Spalding from Winston & Strawn, says the move reflects Texas’s appeal as a venue for high-stakes patent litigation
AI patents and dairy trademarks are at the centre of two judgments to be handed down next week
Jennifer Che explains how taking on the managing director role at her firm has offered a new perspective, and why Hong Kong is seeing a life sciences boom
AG Barr acquires drinks makers Fentimans and Frobishers, in deals worth more than £50m in total
Tarun Khurana at Khurana & Khurana says corporates must take the lead if patent filing activity is to truly translate into innovation
Michael Moore, head of legal at Glean AI, discusses how in-house IP teams can use AI while protecting enforceability
Counsel for SEP owners and implementers are keeping an eye on the case, which could help shape patent enforcement strategy for years to come
Jacob Schroeder explains how he and his team secured victory for Promptu in a long-running patent infringement battle with Comcast
Gift this article