New Zealand’s trademark trends of 2021, and what might happen in 2022

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Zealand’s trademark trends of 2021, and what might happen in 2022

Sponsored by

aj-park.png
up-2081170-1280-2.jpg

Kate Giddens, senior associate at AJ Park and member of the IPONZ Trade mark Technical Focus Group, summarises the key trademark trends seen in New Zealand in 2021, shaping the landscape for what 2022 might bring

In November 2020, the Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand (IPONZ) reported record high filings of national trademarks following a 1% dip in total filings from July 2019 to June 2020.

Jump forward to November 2021, and IPONZ has reported that September 2021 set a new record for the largest number of classes filed, fuelling a 10% increase in filings from the previous year. As in 2020, the growth in filings over the past year has been driven by national applications, with small increases from designations via the Madrid system.

Goods and services on trend

New Zealand trademark filings reflected international trends around the protection of cannabis products for recreational and medical cannabis use. Cannabis brand owners have continued to seek protection for their trademarks, despite the proposed Cannabis Legalisation and Control Bill being rejected in the 2020 public referendum.

In 2020 there was a 75% increase in trademarks containing ‘cannabis’ with numbers holding steady in 2021.

Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) burst into mainstream media with record sales in early 2021, along with the new task of classifying these goods and the related services, along with talk of web3 and the metaverse. Reese Witherspoon recently tweeted: “In the (near) future, every person will have a parallel digital identity. Avatars, crypto wallets, digital goods will be the norm. Are you planning for this?” It would appear brand owners of traditional physical goods and those of the new digital kind are doing so.

In 2021 the number of New Zealand trademark applications that contained the term NFT or ‘digital token’ rose by 542%, applications that contained ‘cryptocurrency’ were up 160%, and applications mentioning ‘blockchain’ increased by 67%.

Trademarks on trend

In New Zealand, trademark applications containing Māori words (kupu) or imagery are referred to the Māori Trade marks Advisory Committee (MTAC) for its advice. The MTAC’s role is to advise if the use of the trademark on the goods and services applied for would be offensive.

Over the past two years, the record numbers of national filings have also seen increases in national trademark applications noted as containing Māori words (kupu) or imagery. In the year ending September 2020, filings increased by 21%. In the same period in 2021, this grew again by 31%.

The year ending September 2020 saw an 88% increase in designations via the Madrid system (the Māori language often shares words with other languages such as Japanese and Hawaiian). This number decreased by 7% in the period ending September 2021 but was still up a considerable amount on the 2019 figures.

The importance of drawing on New Zealand’s culture to help differentiate a brand needs to be finely balanced with celebrating Māori language, imagery, and Māori culture or mātauranga Māori respectfully. This principle will ensure that taonga (treasures, including socially or culturally valuable objects, resources, phenomenon, ideas and techniques) are not misused, tikanga (values, practices and protocols) are not diluted, and that Māori culture is not exploited solely for commercial gain.

This increase has been noted by the MTAC and the New Zealand profession alike. They are keen to ensure clients understand and obtain specialist advice to ensure that the use of Māori words (kupu) or imagery is appropriate and not offensive.

The MTAC and IPONZ trademark examination team are working together on revising the Practice Guidelines to include more guidance for those seeking to protect marks that comprise or contain elements of Māori culture.

Legislative changes to look out for

The pandemic undoubtedly slowed down legislative change as parliament focuses on priorities elsewhere.

The long-awaited Copyright Act review was set for the release of the consultation paper in 2021, but paused in early 2021 to allow resource prioritisation and remains so until the Free Trade Agreement with the UK is finalised and signed.

An exposure draft of the IP Laws Amendment Bill was due for release in mid-2021 but is now expected to be released in March/April 2022. Key points to watch for include:

  • Tightening of the criteria for registration of series trademarks, and placing a cap on the number of marks that can be included as a series;

  • Allowing prior continuous use of a trademark to be considered as a means to overcome a citation, similar to that provided for under Australian law;

  • Providing partial refusal of national trademark applications, allowing for acceptance of the non-refused goods/services where the applicant does not respond to the objection within the timeframe; and

  • The removal of the ‘aggrieved person’ requirement when applying to revoke or invalidate a trademark registration.

Looking forward to 2022

The emerging trends we saw in 2021 are expected to stay.

Trademark filings, particularly national filings, are likely to continue to increase and perhaps break new volume records. New and existing brand owners seek to protect their brands for emerging technology in preparation for web3 and the metaverse.

New Zealand brands are likely to continue to draw on New Zealand’s history and culture to differentiate themselves, including applying for trademarks that contain or draw on Māori words and imagery. 2022 should also provide more guidance on this use, potentially new trademark regulations to facilitate the protection of these new IP rights. 

 

Kate Giddens

Senior associate, AJ Park

E: kate.giddens@ajpark.com 

 

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The case concerns whether the company’s subsidiaries paid Coca-Cola’s US parent company enough for the right to use its IP, including trademarks
Igor Simoes discusses how to juggle multiple projects and why individuals who create groundbreaking technologies inspire him
In the latest UPC update, we review the NanoString and iMop rulings, a big move in London and a decision on whether a patent pool administrator can intervene
The bank announced that its AI and machine learning patents and applications have increased by 94% in the past two years
Niall Trainor, managing attorney at Hasbro, says brands could boost their business with careful portfolio culling
A decision by the Paris Central Division will lead to more IP work for outside counsel, say sources
Courts are encouraged to deliver judgments within three months of a trial, but that deadline has been missed in several recent cases
Lawyers at Maiwald and Sterne Kessler analyse how patents with claims directed to medical treatments are handled in the US and in Europe
Michael DeVincenzo explains how he and his team convinced the Federal Circuit to find in favour of his client in a patent case against Salesforce
Funders and a litigator explain how litigation funding disclosure requirements could affect their business
Gift this article