Managing IP Awards 2022: in-house submissions open
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Managing IP Awards 2022: in-house submissions open

Managing IP APAC Awards

We have started accepting submissions from in-house counsel and teams for the 17th annual Managing IP Awards programme

The annual Managing IP Awards programme recognises remarkable IP achievements and developments in law firms and companies.

The programme covers several IP practice areas and more than 50 jurisdictions. 

The in-house categories recognise teams for their achievements or work in and outside their companies.

 


Nominate your in-house team

We have today launched the research for the in-house categories and invite in-house practitioners to participate by completing our awards form (click here to download the form).

Please upload your completed document to our in-house awards submission portal here. The submission deadline is January 27 2022.

We will use the information submitted, alongside other research data, to decide the shortlists and winners. Subject to research data, we will recognise in-house teams and practitioners in different areas of IP law or for IP in general.

You will find more details and guidelines in our research form.

If you have any questions about our in-house awards, please contact John Harrison.



The timeline for the awards

Managing IP will host three awards ceremonies in 2022, starting with the EMEA Awards in March. We will reveal the location/format and exact dates next year.

November 25: In-house awards submission portal opens here

January 27: In-house awards submission deadline

March: EMEA Awards ceremony (shortlist published in February)

April: Americas Awards ceremony (shortlist published in February)

May: Asia-Pacific Awards ceremony (shortlist published in March)

 

 

 


About the Managing IP Awards

Managing IP launched its awards programme in 2006. The programme has evolved and grown over the years: we now host regional ceremonies, instead of a global ceremony in London, and the research covers more than seven IP practice areas and over 50 jurisdictions.

The awards ceremonies attract hundreds of guests, including in-house counsel and prominent public officials in IP. It is widely regarded as the premier IP law firm awards event in the legal industry.

The awards are based on information obtained from different sources, including submissions from law firms and companies, market feedback surveys, and publicly available information. See this year’s in-house winners for the EMEA Awards here and the Americas Awards here.

Read about our research methodology and the previous awards here.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partners and other senior leaders must step up if they want diverse talent at their firms to thrive
European and US counsel reveal why they are (or aren't) concerned about patent quality and explain how external counsel can help
Firms such as Bird & Bird and Taylor Wessing have reported rising profits and highlighted the role of high-profile IP disputes and hires
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Lawyers in the corporate and IP practices discuss where the firm can steal a march on competitors, its growth plans in London, and why deal lawyers are ‘concertmasters’
Kathleen Gaynor, DEI specialist at Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick, says deliberate actions can help law firms reach diversity goals
Scott McKeown, who moved to Wolf Greenfield one year ago, says the change has helped him tap into life sciences work and advise more patent owners
The winners of our Asia-Pacific Awards 2024 will be revealed during a ceremony in Malaysia on September 26
Zach Piccolomini of Wolf Greenfield explains how to maximise your IP portfolio’s value while keeping an eye on competitors
Witnesses at a Congressional hearing debated whether reforming the ITC is necessary and considered what any changes should look like
Gift this article