Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Managing IP Winter 2021 is now live

Kathi Vidal, who has been nominated for the USPTO director role

Read about Kathi Vidal, AI legal decisions, trademark piracy in China, and much more in our digital-only quarterly

To access the issue, click here

A new era beckons at the USPTO as Kathi Vidal, managing partner of Winston & Strawn’s Silicon Valley office, looks set to become the office’s next director. She would be just the second woman to have held the role in more than 200 years.

However, we are being made to wait – Vidal may have been nominated by President Joe Biden, but she won’t be confirmed until the Senate says so. At the time of writing, that date is unconfirmed, and in the meantime the USPTO remains without a permanent leader despite the capable efforts of acting director Drew Hirshfeld, who is also patents commissioner.

With former director Andrei Iancu having departed in January 2021, it could be at least a year before we know whether Vidal will be the next director. That seems far too long.

Nonetheless, she would be a strong pick, at least according to the lawyers we have spoken to. Her leadership, managerial and litigation prowess will stand her in good stead for the role, our sources say, with one even describing her as a “powerhouse”.

That’s not to say, of course, that there won’t be challenging times ahead (assuming she is confirmed). Her biggest challenge will be managing the political turmoil surrounding discretionary denials at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and the director review mandate set out by the Supreme Court in US v Arthrex. She may also have to manage the implementation of the Restoring the America Invents Act, should it be enacted by Congress.

You can read more about Vidal’s nomination and the road ahead in the cover story of this issue, which is our first digital-only quarterly. As you may be aware, we announced in October that we would no longer be printing magazines and would instead focus on fully digital products. There were a number of reasons for this change, not least the environmental concerns associated with printing and distributing publications globally.

Having said that, we are still able to offer this excellent issue in PDF form – and beyond the cover story mentioned above, you can find an array of expert analysis articles as well as the usual local insights updates from around the world. We hope you enjoy all of the content we have to offer.

Our next issue will be published in early 2022. The big question, though, is will we have a new USPTO director by then?

 

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers wish the latest manual had more details on Federal Circuit cases and that training materials for design patent examiners were online
Counsel are eying domestic industry, concurrent PTAB proceedings and heightened scrutiny of cases before institution
Jack Daniel’s has a good chance of winning its dispute over dog toys, but SCOTUS will still want to protect free speech, predict sources
AI users and lawyers discuss why the rulebook for registering AI-generated content may create problems and needs further work
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
A technical effect must still be evident in the original patent filing, the EBoA said in its G2/21 decision today, March 23
Brands should not be deterred from pursuing lookalike producers, and an unfair advantage claim could be the key, say Emma Teichmann and Geoff Steward at Stobbs
Justice Mellor’s highly anticipated ruling surprised SEP owners and reassured implementers that the UK may not be so hostile after all
The England and Wales High Court's judgment comes ahead of a separate hearing concerning one of the patents-in-suit at the EPO
While the rules allow foreign firms to open local offices and offer IP services, a ban on litigation and practising Indian law could mean little will change