Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Managing IP Winter 2021 is now live

Kathi Vidal, who has been nominated for the USPTO director role

Read about Kathi Vidal, AI legal decisions, trademark piracy in China, and much more in our digital-only quarterly

To access the issue, click here

A new era beckons at the USPTO as Kathi Vidal, managing partner of Winston & Strawn’s Silicon Valley office, looks set to become the office’s next director. She would be just the second woman to have held the role in more than 200 years.

However, we are being made to wait – Vidal may have been nominated by President Joe Biden, but she won’t be confirmed until the Senate says so. At the time of writing, that date is unconfirmed, and in the meantime the USPTO remains without a permanent leader despite the capable efforts of acting director Drew Hirshfeld, who is also patents commissioner.

With former director Andrei Iancu having departed in January 2021, it could be at least a year before we know whether Vidal will be the next director. That seems far too long.

Nonetheless, she would be a strong pick, at least according to the lawyers we have spoken to. Her leadership, managerial and litigation prowess will stand her in good stead for the role, our sources say, with one even describing her as a “powerhouse”.

That’s not to say, of course, that there won’t be challenging times ahead (assuming she is confirmed). Her biggest challenge will be managing the political turmoil surrounding discretionary denials at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and the director review mandate set out by the Supreme Court in US v Arthrex. She may also have to manage the implementation of the Restoring the America Invents Act, should it be enacted by Congress.

You can read more about Vidal’s nomination and the road ahead in the cover story of this issue, which is our first digital-only quarterly. As you may be aware, we announced in October that we would no longer be printing magazines and would instead focus on fully digital products. There were a number of reasons for this change, not least the environmental concerns associated with printing and distributing publications globally.

Having said that, we are still able to offer this excellent issue in PDF form – and beyond the cover story mentioned above, you can find an array of expert analysis articles as well as the usual local insights updates from around the world. We hope you enjoy all of the content we have to offer.

Our next issue will be published in early 2022. The big question, though, is will we have a new USPTO director by then?

 

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

We have started accepting submissions from in-house counsel and teams for the 19th annual Managing IP Awards programme
Patient groups and generics makers may have to bear the brunt of India’s latest attempt at patent reform
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer about their life and career
Paolo Tavolato, who will share the role, said private equity support would help the IP consultancy achieve its ambitious M&A plans
Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas has hired former Anand & Anand partner Swati Sharma and hopes to compete with specialist IP firms
Rapporteur-Judge András Kupecz ruled that education and training weren’t legitimate reasons for a member of the public to access documents
Searches for comparison prior art will be a little easier, but practitioners will have to put more thought into claim construction and design patent titles
The Helsinki local division rejected AIM Sport’s request for a preliminary injunction in a dispute with rival Supponor
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The FTC’s plans to scrutinise improperly listed Orange Book patents could make these listings more important in litigation, but firms should be looking at this anyway