Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Turkey: IP court rules on Red Bull’s colour marks in an infringement claim

Sponsored by


Zeynep Seda Alhas and Dilan Sıla Kayalıca of Gün and Partners consider the Turkish IP court’s ruling on an infringement case by Red Bull

Red Bull, the leading manufacturer and pioneer for energy drinks, encounters many trademarks, designs and trade dresses attempting to gain unfair advantage of Red Bull’s tremendous reputation worldwide.

Turkey is one market where Red Bull is the leader, so there has been a significant number of sales and market awareness. Therefore, the Turkish market is monitored carefully for infringing products, and brand protection strategy is applied properly by Red Bull.

In mid-2020, Red Bull determined that the products (‘Power Jaguar products’) are manufactured, marketed, and sold via both offline and online channels.


With the lawsuit initiated before the Civil IP Court of İzmir (IP court) on September 30 2020, Red Bull claimed trademark infringement and unfair competition against their products on the market, as well as their registered device and colour trademarks in Turkey, all incorporating a blue/silver colour combination. 



One of the defendants, mainly dealing with the marketing of Power Jaguar products, acknowledged marketing these products for four months in 2019 via its website, but denied trademark infringement and unfair competition allegations, claiming that they never actually sold Power Jaguar products.

The other defendant – the manufacturer of Power Jaguar products – relied on the dissimilarity of the word and graphic elements of the parties’ products and further questioned the distinctiveness of Red Bull’s blue/silver colour combination marks.

After hearing the parties’ arguments and defenses, the IP court allowed Red Bull’s request for an interlocutory injunction and decided for the seizure of Power Jaguar products as well as the promotional materials related thereto.

Red Bull enforced the interlocutory injunction wherever necessary and removed the infringing products from the market. The IP court rendered its decision in favour of Red Bull on September 29 2021 – within a year’s time, which is quick in comparison to the usual length of infringement actions.

The IP court evaluated that the use of colours on Power Jaguar products are similar to Red Bull’s trademarks, mainly to the reproduced Turkish trademark registration no. 2014 03556, and this is likely to  cause  confusion in the eyes of the average consumer.

The IP court acknowledged that the overall get-up of the Power Jaguar products creates trademark infringement and unfair competition and decided for the prevention of such on the relevant goods, plates, signboards and promotional materials, in addition to the seizure and destruction thereof.




The protection granted to non-conventional trademarks in Turkey is not yet settled but this decision is remarkable as it shows the extent of protection that should be granted to colour combination marks, through Red Bull’s blue/silver colour mark.

The IP Court’s decision has not become binding yet; appeal processes are available.


Zeynep Seda Alhas

Partner, Gun + Partners



Dilan Sıla Kayalıca

Senior associate, Gun + Partners


more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brands should not be deterred from pursuing lookalike producers, and an unfair advantage claim could be the key, say Emma Teichmann and Geoff Steward at Stobbs
Justice Mellor’s highly anticipated ruling surprised SEP owners and reassured implementers that the UK may not be so hostile after all
The England and Wales High Court's judgment comes ahead of a separate hearing concerning one of the patents-in-suit at the EPO
While the rules allow foreign firms to open local offices and offer IP services, a ban on litigation and practising Indian law could mean little will change
A New York federal court heard oral arguments this week in a copyright case pitting publishing giants against a digital library
Commissioner Hamano Koichi shares his vision for the JPO and explains that IP offices must promote innovation that drives social change
The Asia-Pacific awards research cycle has now begun – don’t miss on this opportunity be recognised in 2023
The Supreme Court, which is hearing two IP cases this week, should limit the power of US courts to rule on foreign sales
Safety standards wouldn’t lose copyright protection when named in law, so long as they were accessible for free online
In-house tech sources say Amgen v Sanofi has the potential to stifle their prosecution and litigation strategies if SCOTUS’s decision is too broad