All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 Managing IP is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Nigeria’s plant variety protection: in line with international IP norms

Sponsored by

spoor-fisher-400px.png
obinna-okerekeocha-fgd8pahzn98-unsplash.jpg

Margaret Le Galle of Spoor & Fisher explains why the Plant Variety Protection Act 2021 will bring Nigerian IP law in line with international norms

In May 2021, the Plant Variety Protection Act 2021 (the Act) was signed into law in Nigeria, and on August 27 2021, the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV) reaffirmed Nigeria’s conformity with the 1991 Act of the UPOV Convention, allowing Nigeria to become a UPOV member.

The Act establishes a Plant Variety Registry which is to be housed within the National Agriculture Seed Council (NASC). Regulations are currently being finalised to give effect to the Act.

Plant breeders who have already made sales or disposals of a variety in Nigeria are advised to monitor the developments closely, as the breeder of an existing variety of recent creation (where sale or disposal of a variety took place in Nigeria within four years before the filing date or, in the case of trees or of vines, within six years before the said date) may apply for plant breeders’ rights protection within 12 months of the date of commencement of the Act (i.e. by May 21 2022).

See below some of the Act’s more important features.

The big picture

The explanatory memorandum says that the objective is to “promote increased staple crop productivity for smallholder farmers in Nigeria and encourage investment in plant breeding and crop variety development”.

All things great and small

The Act provides for the protection of all plant genera and species.

Requirements for protection

The requirements for protection are the usual UPOV requirements – new, distinct, uniform and stable.

New – the novelty requirement will be met if, at the date of filing, propagating or harvested material of the variety has not been sold or disposed of with the breeder’s consent in Nigeria earlier than one year before the date of filing, or four years elsewhere (six years in the case of a tree or vine). There are, however, a number of exceptions dealing with trials, disposals related to testing, unauthorised sales and displays at officially-recognised exhibitions.

Distinct – the term is defined to mean “clearly distinguishable from any other variety whose existence is a matter of common knowledge at the time of filing”.

Uniform – the term is defined to mean sufficiently uniform in its relevant characteristics, taking account of variation that may be expected from the particular features of the variety’s propagation.

Stable – the term is defined to mean that the relevant characteristics remain unchanged after repeated propagation or, in the case of a particular cycle of propagation, at the end of each such cycle.

The procedure

The legislation sets out:

  • An application process;

  • The need for a denomination;

  • Priority rights of 12 months;

  • Publication of the application;

  • Objections to the application, with grounds being a lack of entitlement to file, a material misrepresentation, and failure to comply with the Act or regulations;

  • Examination of the application; and

  • Issue of a certificate.

Scope of the right

The breeder’s right covers:

  • Multiplication;

  • Conditioning for the purpose of propagation;

  • Offering for sale, selling or marketing, exporting, importing or stocking for any of the above purposes;

  • Harvested material obtained through unauthorised use of propagating material, and products made directly from such harvested material; and

  • Essentially derived varieties (EDVs).

Exclusions

Excluded from the breeder’s right are:

  • Private and non-commercial use;

  • Acts for experimental purposes; and

  • Acts for the purpose of breeding any other variety.

Provision is also made for the so-called ‘Farmers Privilege’. For a list of agricultural crops specified by the Minister, the breeder's right shall not extend to a farmer who, within reasonable limits and subject to the safeguarding of the legitimate interests of the holder of the breeder's right, uses for propagating purposes on his own holding, the product of the harvest which he has obtained by planting on his own holding.

Duration

The right lasts for 20 years from the date of grant, except in the case of trees and vines where it is 25 years from date of grant.

Infringement

There are civil and criminal measures relating to infringement.

Welcome development

The legislation brings Nigerian IP law further in line with international norms and it will benefit both Nigerians and international companies.  It will result in Nigeria becoming a member of the UPOV. It will attract new investment into the country’s seed industry. It is a welcome development.

 

Margaret Le GalleDirector, Spoor & FisherE: m.legalle@spoor.co.uk

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Counsel consider settlements and federal court actions to get around TTAB delays, but there’s not much they can do
Ex-parte reexams don’t create estoppel and are a worthy backup when IPRs fail, say sources
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
A proposed rewrite of the EU design system would see registered Community designs renamed and new laws on spare parts
EOne offers SConnect a YouTube policy lesson after the Vietnam-based company made seemingly false claims about IP
Audrey Lee, general counsel at Starz Entertainment, tells Managing IP about her company’s Ninth Circuit copyright victory and what keeps her up at night
Inaugural awards announces winners
Members of the Industry Patent Quality Charter say their concerns have fallen on deaf ears at the EPO
The three-month sunrise period before the court opens cannot begin until Germany deposits its instrument of ratification
The UPC’s IT team is frantically trying to resolve technology issues – counsel say the deadlines may be too tight