Opinion: Media outrage over menopause TM misses the point
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Opinion: Media outrage over menopause TM misses the point

Target shot opportunity dartboard performance how accurate can it be win looser miss fail flunk throw loss failure score on white background competition archery isolated 3d illustration

UK TV presenter Davina McCall has applied to trademark the term ‘Menopausing’, and the reaction from the media has been sadly predictable

According to some of the UK media, Davina McCall is heading for world domination – and a trademark application related to the menopause is driving her quest.

Who is McCall, you may well ask? For those who don’t know, McCall is a TV presenter who is probably most famous for a long stint presenting the UK version of the reality TV show ‘Big Brother’ in the early 2000s.  

These days, while still undertaking other presenting duties, 53-year-old McCall has been trying to raise awareness of the struggles that women face when experiencing the menopause. A book about this, called ‘Menopausing’, is due to be released in May next year.

However, after it came to light this week that the presenter had sought to trademark the term at the UKIPO earlier this summer, the reaction from some corners of the media has been grimly predictable.

The application covers books and other reading material, as well as lotions, candles, media platforms, and a handful of other goods and services.

“Davina McCall is turning her menopause into a money-spinning brand,” blustered the Daily Mail with its trademark (pardon the pun) outrage. “Davina McCall wants to trademark ‘menopausing’ — who does that help?” asked journalist and author Kevin Maher in his column in The Times.  

Nothing nefarious

A few things bother me about this coverage.   

First, the tone. There is a sense within the mainstream media that the trademarking of a term is somehow a nefarious act and a way of obtaining a monopoly over a phrase to the exclusion of all others.

This is not the first time a story about a trademark application has been reported in this way and it won’t be the last.

Second is the idea that McCall is taking ownership of a biological process. She is not trademarking ‘menopause’, but ‘menopausing’ – a word she has made up and for which she is entirely within her rights to defend. Further, she is only seeking protection for certain products.

Such was the strength of the furore, McCall was forced to make a clarification on social media in which she insisted that the trademark application was only to protect her upcoming book and nothing else.

“I am not making any products, I am not starting a business, I am not making anything to try and make money out of anybody,” she said.

I should, at this stage, give the reports a little bit of credit. At least they have not confused trademarks with copyright or patents – a mistake that still creeps into mainstream media IP reporting with frightening regularity.

Damp squib

However, away from the sensationalist tone, there is a slightly more practical element to all of this.

While it is true that the application covers a range of items beyond merely books and literature, this is actually entirely normal, say sources.

Aaron Wood, attorney at Blaser Mills in the UK, says an application designating a variety of goods and services is “completely standard”.

“I’d love to say there is something hidden or that she is going to be doing something nefarious, but it’s all very normal,” he tells Managing IP, adding that the reporting is “somewhat of a damp squib”.

James Love, partner at Womble Bond Dickinson, agrees.

“A challenge anybody has when launching a new brand is what goods and services to protect. It is not untypical for someone without experience of the system to want protection for their new name on all goods and services in all countries,” he says.

Love says while this is a relatively broad filing, it is still fairly typical for an enterprise wishing to sell products in the health, home and leisure sectors.

Up in the air

In fact, just because the application is directed to additional goods and services, there is no guarantee that future products will be launched in this line.

The non-literature-related applications could be speculative and abandoned after a period of non-use. Or they could be defensive, to ensure that similar products using the ‘menopausing’ term do not spring up.

Either way, McCall does not own the rights to anything yet. Even if she did, it would not stop other applicants from using the term for unrelated goods and services. Even if they did, there’s no guarantee McCall would take a hard line against it.

However, Wood at Blaser Mills notes that McCall’s public declaration that “it’s only going to be a book” could be unhelpful to her should anyone seek to challenge or oppose the application.

“My prediction is it [the application] is covering the extra items as either a potential for growth or because they want to stop someone else nabbing the trademark for other goods – so a defensive step,” he says.

Love notes that McCall (or her attorneys) will have had to sign a declaration of intent to use.

He adds: “Remember that it is not claiming any rights in the word menopause, but only in the coined term ‘menopausing’.”

The media would do well to remember that too.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

CMS, which was told to respond to a cancellation action by February 12 but filed its response a day later, has rowed back on claims about an IT error
The deal could help Rouse gain a foothold in Australia and New Zealand for the first time
With a team of more than 80 patent lawyers and attorneys across 21 European offices, the firm is acting in some of the most high-profile UPC cases
Lippes Mathias has hired three partners and a counsel from Offit Kurman
External counsel for automotive companies explain how trends such as AI and vehicle connectivity are affecting their practices and reveal what their clients are prioritising
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The winners of the awards will be revealed at a gala dinner in New York City on April 25
Counsel debate the potential outcome of SCOTUS’s latest copyright case after justices questioned whether they should dismiss it
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer about their life and career
The small Düsseldorf firm is making a big impact in the UPC. Founding partner Christof Augenstein explains why
Gift this article