CPA Global hit with new class action claim
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

CPA Global hit with new class action claim


The IP services provider overcharged clients for renewals in a “deliberate and systematic” scheme, the lawsuit claims

Intellectual property services company CPA Global has been accused of substantial overcharging in a class action complaint brought by a medical device company on behalf of itself and around 100 other CPA clients.

In the complaint, filed at the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, New York-based Brainchild Surgical Devices claimed CPA overcharged for renewals and issued “opaque invoices” to conceal this.  

The complaint further alleges that CPA uses similar contracts and pricing structures for all, or nearly all, of its clients in a “deliberate and systematic scheme”.

A spokesperson for Clarivate, which acquired CPA Global in 2020, said it “categorically and emphatically denies any wrongdoing”.

“The fees for our services are defined in our agreements with our customers, and we adhere to those agreements fully,” the spokesperson added.

According to the complaint, filed on May 2, Brainchild entered into an agreement with CPA for managing maintenance payments for its registered, and in some cases pending, patent and design rights around the world.

CPA, Brainchild alleges, agreed to charge a fixed fee of $200 per payment plus CPA’s costs on top.

However, according to the complaint, CPA’s invoices “made it difficult for Brainchild to determine the actual costs incurred in making payments, and thus difficult to tell if Brainchild was being overcharged”.

The complaint includes several examples of renewals work undertaken by CPA at various IP offices, including at the EPO and CIPO, Canada’s IP office. In each case, there were “undisclosed overcharges” of between $214 and $610, the complaint alleges.

It is not the first time CPA has been accused of overcharging – in 2016, the company was sued in a separate class action lawsuit in the US.

According to the latest complaint, in October 2017 the Eastern District of Virginia approved a $5.6 million settlement that went to then-class members.

Brainchild is seeking an order requiring CPA to reimburse any wrongfully obtained funds, damages and attorneys’ fees, as well as an order preventing it from continuing “unfair and deceptive” business practices.

In its complaint Brainchild states that if CPA were to change its billing practices, it might retain the company in the future to manage international patent registration payments.

The Clarivate spokesperson added: “We consider the allegations of overcharging in the new class action to be a deliberate attempt to tarnish our good business reputation and we vigorously defend ourselves against any such vexatious speculation.”


more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Meet the esteemed judges who are assessing the first-ever Social Impact Awards
Lawyers debate whether the Supreme Court’s ruling helps maintain confidence in the trademark system
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The group of lawyers, which includes seven IP partners, say they were impressed by ArentFox Schiff's wide-reaching experience
Andy Sherman, general counsel at Dolby Laboratories, says the company will continue to make GE Licensing’s patents available through existing pools
CMS, which represents Nestlé, had been told to respond to a cancellation action by February 12 but filed its response a day later
Keith Bergelt, CEO of the Open Invention Network, explains why AI technologies were not part of an update to its cross-licensing project
Kirkland & Ellis partners explain how they secured the dismissal of a patent case in which the other side had lied under oath
Managing IP understands the association had been considering other options, including Madrid or Vienna, after concerns were raised over Dubai’s positions on various rights
Chris Marando tells Managing IP that he's excited to work on PTAB matters at Perkins Coie, which recently hired another lawyer from his former firm
Gift this article